me too, or just bleep?I get narcissism, not munchausens
me too, or just bleep?I get narcissism, not munchausens
Just a bleepme too, or just bleep?
I think if I was on this jury I would just deactivate all my social media while it was on goingI find it worrying, does anyone know about the rules surrounding social media use for the jury / others involved in the trial? Because they’re not supposed to read about the trial but imagine you’re jury member just scrolling on twitter and tweets from people like this start popping up onto your feed for whatever reason, or someone else you follow RTs them?
Tbh I really don’t think this is going away, I think her being considered a scapegoat will probably become one of the UK’s next big conspiracy theories.
---
The fact that hummingbird is still going is also an important point. I hate that it’ll probably come out that she has allegedly harmed more innocent babies, but maybe that’ll also go some way towards crushing some of the utterly absurd theories and hatred of the NHS / hcp’s in general that we’re seeing flying around at the moment.
This is a really dumb question, but what additional evidence could they research? How would they even find any other evidence when it's not in the trial. Would it be things like people's experiences, articles from her arrest?I remember the judge mentioning social media at the start of the trial and I found this from the reporting.
View attachment 2264065
Yeah. I feel as though, if found guilty, the psychological profile will be a bit different to what we are used to from women killers.Does anyone else actually get the vibe that she isn’t munchausen?
I think it’s more that they could Google her and see places like this or the conspiracy theorists and then they could be swayed either way. It’s not that there’s evidence but it’s more that they could be distracted by irrelevance and then an unconscious bias when being presented with the information in courtThis is a really dumb question, but what additional evidence could they research? How would they even find any other evidence when it's not in the trial. Would it be things like people's experiences, articles from her arrest?
Cuntiscious disorderJust a bleep
I think it's a horrible mix of sadism and grief tourism.me too, or just bleep?
There are scientific journals online describing other premature babies's care and research studies. So the danger is the jury doing there own research with proper scientific articles but maybe not fully following them or comparing them to the babies inappropriately. The evidence they need to use is what's been approved by the prosecution and defence. Certain people on Facebook keep linking these articles.This is a really dumb question, but what additional evidence could they research? How would they even find any other evidence when it's not in the trial. Would it be things like people's experiences, articles from her arrest?
It’s not all or nothing. They will make individual judgement each of the (14?) charges and then sentencing comes after that. Technically they could find her guilty on May one count and she could be sentenced to life behind bars. I think?!what happens if the jury agree on some of the charges but cannot agree on others? Is the whole trial then completely ducked? Ie if they agree on like 20 of the charges and then are hung on the remaining 2?
bland food and endless amounts of water, good luckAny of you gorgeous lot got any top hangover cures? Dying here![]()
Sleep is all that really worksAny of you gorgeous lot got any top hangover cures? Dying here![]()
Hair of the dogAny of you gorgeous lot got any top hangover cures? Dying here![]()
Maccies and apple juiceAny of you gorgeous lot got any top hangover cures? Dying here![]()