I can’t imagine the pain for the those parents. To lose one is bad enough but to lose their sibling the day after, I’d need pulling off the window ledge
Then to find out later some witch had killed them must be horrific for them, thank god they managed to get the surviving one moved as I am sure she would have went for them too.I can’t imagine the pain for the those parents. To lose one is bad enough but to lose their sibling the day after, I’d need pulling off the window ledge
I do now you’ve said thatDoes anyone think she pricked herself, deliberately, to remove herself from the line of responsibility? I wasn't there, couldn't have been me, etc?
Also fainting for sympathy.
I don't want to side track the thread, but if other people are also interested in knowing, could you say a bit about how you put personal feelings and thoughts aside?
I work in healthcare now. It's a basic ethical principle that everyone has a right to a good standard of treatment and care, no matter who they are or what they've done. This fits with my own values, so I'm confident I can uphold it. But in the legal sphere it looks like a much more challenging thing to do, because you're actually involved in establishing whether the person did what they were accused of or not. I think I'd find it much more difficult to step back from my own opinions and stay clear-headed in that situation, so I'm interested to know how you develop the skill and if it gets easier with time.
And I bet the faint was Gillian McKeith style....I do now you’ve said that
it really is. We knew the last few babies were some of the hardest reading earlier in the trial so I was expecting it to be really difficult under cross examination, but it’s been worse than I thought. And I don’t really feel that NJ has needed to progress from first gear today as the facts present themself - though I do have a weird feeling that there is some more difficult/shocking stuff to come before he is done with her. extra love today to the thread famToday’s reading is absolutely draining![]()
As awful as the idea is this trial is in it's 8 month(?) now - they are probably used to itCan you imagine hearing all that, and then going for lunch???
This is so heartbreaking to hearNow12:52
Child O died in his parents' arms after being baptised
Child O was baptised and then died in his parents' arms at 5.47pm on 23 June 2016.
In her nursing notes the following day, Lucy Letby wrote "peripheral access lost" in relation to why the infant required an IV.
A doctor has previously told the court this was not true.
"That is [colleague]'s opinion," Letby tells the court.
Letby is accused of injecting air into Child O.
"Why were you making an untrue statement in the form?" Mr Johnson asks.
"I don't believe it was untrue at the time."
"Is it just a coincidence you were making this report pretty much at the time you had been removed from the unit?" Mr Johnson asks.
"I hadn't been removed from the unit at this point."
Letby says she was removed from the neonatal unit in July.
"You were very worried they were on to you, weren't they?"
"No."
I used to manage a chemical lab and had to fire a chap who filled out an incident form to cover up for not doing something. Not the cleverest way of covering your tracks!So they think the datix form was a lie to cover her own a?
Why would a Dr going out for a fag while all that’s going on….. she’s so odd"She said one of the doctors had gone out to smoke a cigarette during the time of Child O's resuscitation, and when that doctor returned, they did not wash their hands. "
Oh that will deffo be what caused the impact trauma to the baby's liver. Let her go home now tbh, case closed.
Shame he didn't come back n put the fag in her bleeping eyeWhy would a Dr going out for a fag while all that’s going on….. she’s so odd
I've been involved in many emergencies in hospital, I have never seen anyone casually stroll off for anything, let alone slip outside for a fag. What a ridiculously stupid thing for LL to say.Why would a Dr going out for a fag while all that’s going on….. she’s so odd