It's not impossible that people were working out of their scope of competence, but it begs the question as to why Lucy or anyone else who was suitably qualified and would understand the risks of this wouldn't say anything. She messaged about low staffing and general staffing issues and I suspect most who have worked in the NHS wouldn't find that overly unbelievable (I have only worked in an NHS hospital as a military HCP mind so a bit different); for me it doesn't explain away all of the collapses and deaths even if it might have had an impact on some or allow an environment that perhaps didn't catch things that a fully staffed and well run unit would.BM is giving the impression of a very chaotic unit with Band 4 nurses allegedly agreeing to undertake work they are not trained to do. As I am not clinically trained Iam finding it a bit difficult to know whether BM is muddying waters or whether this is showing up serious NICU issues and putting LL in a better light please could clinically trained tattle members give their take on all this.
See I thought she was a 'Pimm's on the lawn' type of girl, pretending she's all posh and that. Under her murdering wolf in sheep's clothing imageJust catching up on the thread, thought it was a lucy letby thread not an alcohol thread. Talk about clogging the thread up
Are assistant practitioners band 4?It's not impossible that people were working out of their scope of competence, but it begs the question as to why Lucy or anyone else who was suitably qualified and would understand the risks of this wouldn't say anything. She messaged about low staffing and general staffing issues and I suspect most who have worked in the NHS wouldn't find that overly unbelievable (I have only worked in an NHS hospital as a military HCP mind so a bit different); for me it doesn't explain away all of the collapses and deaths even if it might have had an impact on some or allow an environment that perhaps didn't catch things that a fully staffed and well run unit would.
What band 4s are they referring to though, I know NAs were spoken about in 2015 but I didn't think they were actually introduced until 2017ish?
I think they are. Or it might have changed nowAre assistant practitioners band 4?
Nursing associates are band 4. Registered nurses start at band 5 (as an aside, how weird is it that NHS staff often refer to themselves and others as their pay grade?!)What would be an example of a band 4 nurse? My son has had a stoma since birth I am really confused what all the fuss is about with that one, just change the bagon one hand she pretends she is the most qualified nurse but now she can’t manage a stoma?
If it helps, those of us who review these pick up on 'that nurse' very quickly and mostly just shut the report and ignore it!She strikes me as a datix queen , we all have one person on a ward who writes the most pathetic reports for human errors that aren't even massive things.
Would be interesting to see if she did datix reports for other smaller things , would show glaringly her omitting this is questionable.
She’s so up herself.“Had 3 missed calls they don't know how to give immunoglobulin and I was last person to give so just phoned and told them”
I don’t believe for one second that this is true, the narc I knew always came out with balls like this and I think LL is one too. Painting the picture already she’s the best at her job and everyone else on the unit is useless.
Do you have a link to this?If it helps, those of us who review these pick up on 'that nurse' very quickly and mostly just shut the report and ignore it!
Sorry if this has been discussed before, I didn't join the threads until quite late. On Websleuths yesterday, for about 30 seconds before it was pulled, there was a link to the report on the unit. It was very interesting reading. Has anybody else seen it? Without wanting to break any rules about court etc, it's abundantly clear that there were huge issues with this unit and regardless of LL and what she's done, it should have been downgraded anyway...
Has it been raised back up to its previous status yet?
i can see why she would be apprehensive but I don’t think it’s worth a song and dance. The stoma situation wouldn’t have needed much care if any off the nurses once pain was managed. I still get the impression she was up her own aNursing associates are band 4. Registered nurses start at band 5 (as an aside, how weird is it that NHS staff often refer to themselves and others as their pay grade?!)
Subspecialised nurses often get a bit precious about things they don’t deal with. I can see her being hesitant about the stoma to be fair to her.
Re: the pay grade, it's a hierarchy thing. I've never known anything more insidious in a workplace than the obsession with NHS banding. It makes it very difficult to forge meaningful professional relationships. It's one of the things causing huge damage to the NHS as a whole, IMO.Nursing associates are band 4. Registered nurses start at band 5 (as an aside, how weird is it that NHS staff often refer to themselves and others as their pay grade?!)
Subspecialised nurses often get a bit precious about things they don’t deal with. I can see her being hesitant about the stoma to be fair to her.
No, like I said the post was pulled down immediately. It was a pdf though, so it's in my downloads. No idea if I can/should share it further in case I'm in contempt of court or something though!Do you have a link to this?
I’m medical so thankfully our hierarchy is more useful to actually understand someone’s role! Asking whether a reg is ST7 or ST3 tells me lot because I know how close they are to consultancy.Re: the pay grade, it's a hierarchy thing. I've never known anything more insidious in a workplace than the obsession with NHS banding. It makes it very difficult to forge meaningful professional relationships. It's one of the things causing huge damage to the NHS as a whole, IMO.
do you mean the CQC report?If it helps, those of us who review these pick up on 'that nurse' very quickly and mostly just shut the report and ignore it!
Sorry if this has been discussed before, I didn't join the threads until quite late. On Websleuths yesterday, for about 30 seconds before it was pulled, there was a link to the report on the unit. It was very interesting reading. Has anybody else seen it? Without wanting to break any rules about court etc, it's abundantly clear that there were huge issues with this unit and regardless of LL and what she's done, it should have been downgraded anyway...
Has it been raised back up to its previous status yet?
No. It's the external review of the unit, which was published in November 2016.do you mean the CQC report?