I think it’s about the parents and seeing them suffer rather than the babies too, but I don’t know how anyone can think it’s because her parents are controlling. We don’t know anything about them.
I think it’s about the parents and seeing them suffer rather than the babies too, but I don’t know how anyone can think it’s because her parents are controlling. We don’t know anything about them.
totally agree, it seems drama followed her.From reading the write ups it’s definitely looking like she enjoyed the drama/the upset it caused when these babies declined again - the whole saying she could see the baby & was pale but the baby was covered
absolute inexplicable fury towards her after reading this. Grateful for the courtroom that it’s Friday. Glad they’ve had a productive week though, she needs locking away for good asap.Awful details here in the second half of the article. Poor baby I.
![]()
Lucy Letby 'was in tears as she said 'it's always me when it happens'
Lucy Letby, 33, denies murdering seven babies and attempting to murder 10 others between June 2015 and June 2016.www.dailymail.co.uk
---
Only minor added detail at the very end. This poor poor nurse. I’m sorry but I feel nothing but sympathy for these people. And there’s Letby in her police interview saying she couldn’t recall baby I. She’s full of tit.
![]()
Accused nurse cried over baby collapses, jury told - BBC News
Lucy Letby said it felt like babies often became seriously ill on her shifts, a doctor tells a jury.www.bbc.com
Thanks for sharing, again there is no doubt in my mind.Awful details here in the second half of the article. Poor baby I.
![]()
Lucy Letby 'was in tears as she said 'it's always me when it happens'
Lucy Letby, 33, denies murdering seven babies and attempting to murder 10 others between June 2015 and June 2016.www.dailymail.co.uk
---
Only minor added detail at the very end. This poor poor nurse. I’m sorry but I feel nothing but sympathy for these people. And there’s Letby in her police interview saying she couldn’t recall baby I. She’s full of tit.
![]()
Accused nurse cried over baby collapses, jury told - BBC News
Lucy Letby said it felt like babies often became seriously ill on her shifts, a doctor tells a jury.www.bbc.com
Yep. It’s always her. Even when it’s a different nurse’s baby. Often when they’ve turned their back or had a break. Often when she’s there totally alone. Another baby that was stable. Another baby with problems that only occurred in her vicinity. It’s always her. She said it eh.Thanks for sharing, again there is no doubt in my mind.
Letby herself seems to accept this was happening to her all the time, if innocent, why did she never stop to question her practices? She's a monster.
Some of these poor wee souls were hardly capable of even crying out.I think it’s about the parents and seeing them suffer rather than the babies too, but I don’t know how anyone can think it’s because her parents are controlling. We don’t know anything about them.
Odd that the picture identified by the nurse differs slightly between each article. One is lighter than the other.Awful details here in the second half of the article. Poor baby I.
![]()
Lucy Letby 'was in tears as she said 'it's always me when it happens'
Lucy Letby, 33, denies murdering seven babies and attempting to murder 10 others between June 2015 and June 2016.www.dailymail.co.uk
---
Only minor added detail at the very end. This poor poor nurse. I’m sorry but I feel nothing but sympathy for these people. And there’s Letby in her police interview saying she couldn’t recall baby I. She’s full of tit.
![]()
Accused nurse cried over baby collapses, jury told - BBC News
Lucy Letby said it felt like babies often became seriously ill on her shifts, a doctor tells a jury.www.bbc.com
Daily Mail:Odd that the picture identified by the nurse differs slightly between each article. One is lighter than the other.
It's slight but there's definitely a difference, the daily mail one has been dulled.Daily Mail:
View attachment 1915349
BBC:
View attachment 1915352
I can't see a difference, they look the same to me.
Okay I accept you see a difference but they look exactly the same to meIt's slight but there's definitely a difference, the daily mail one has been dulled.
Nobody could have seen any detail of a baby in any photo.It's slight but there's definitely a difference, the daily mail one has been dulled.
No they're both really dark, I just found it interesting that they looked slightly different. I think it's mainly the photo quality but it's one of the few pieces of visual evidence we've had.Nobody could have seen any detail of a baby in any photo.
I think they look the same personallyIt's slight but there's definitely a difference, the daily mail one has been dulled.