i can assure you I know some of the darkest or most traumatic things about people I’ve met and yet I couldn’t sit here and say ‘Mrs x’ did something or looked a certain way off the top of my head - notes would prompt me but I don’t store their life in my mind for my own good. I often say to people that I don’t look at people as people - say if they feel nervous re smear test - the same way an accountant would look at a list of numbers - you’re looking at it to see how it comes together, if anything might be wrong with it and if you can put it right. I use the same logic to have my bikini line waxed knowing the beautician is looking at what needs doing as a task, not as my bitsSad really because you trust these people and this case has shown how bitchy these nurses are . Imagine being at your most vulnerable just having a baby and the staff are all texting each other about you and how you look what your wearing
… actually makes me physically sick that this goes on I will never trust a nurse again knowing they are talking behind your back
alleged baby killer, not finished trial yet.She constantly deffends a baby killer like all the time??!!! Its really weird in my opinion sorrrrreeeee
I find the text in the card pretty odd. “Your loved one will be remembered with smiles”. This is a tiny baby who experienced so much suffering in their short life. Not a Nana who’s died in their 80s who filled their life with happy memories. It is tragic and distressing. Not something to look back on and smile about…unless you’ve enjoyed seeing a baby suffer so much.
I don't want to poo in your pocket. I get what you're sayingRespectfully, and I do intend to stay away because I follow this thread, but once bitten, the reason no one comments here against the general flow is because it's not particularly welcome. That's fine in itself and I'm not really wanting to join in generally, but I don't think it's because everyone now feels the evidence is presented and signed and sealed.
I really don't wanna start shit and didn't intend to comment and probably won't again, but I don't think it's quiet here because it's clear she's guilty. It's gone quiet because people can't be arsed with the aggro.
Peace. This isn't a shit stir, it's just there's no dissenting voices and that is a bit weird in a discussion forum
Anyway I'm going back to NB and the Markles
inevitably there will be a lot more of differing intensities imo, there will be cases that will not have been deemed to have sufficient evidence to stand up in court and thereby could risk the entire case. Once this is over there will me more stories to come.I think so. But “a number of…” made me think there may be more events than are being covered in the trial?
There’s sticking together though and there’s a large scale conspiracy between 3 huge organisations (police, nhs and cps) involving hundreds of individuals, and 22 serious charges of murder and attempted murder. Each of the three is so understaffed and underfunded they can barely communicate internally, let alone organise a cover up between them. There’s reasons why I think the evidence might not hold up in some cases, but having worked for two of the three organisations, I just cannot fathom a coverup of this scale* is possible.I will say as I've said before professionals are birds of a feather and they stick together and alot of them will not admit when they've got something wrong. Still camp unsure but it's not looking good is it.
‘not a great deal of research in AE in babies’ stands out to me. I’d guess there was little research because this simply should not happen but here we are at chester and it not just happening once but multiple..View attachment 1947747
absofeckinglutely right Dr Evans. About time someone shoved this back at BM. My heart ached reading the article but I did a little air punch at this quote. I’m sure the prosecution have covered it in more technical discussions but having this as a response from a witness is fantastic.
Hahaha yeah, I think me and that particular poster got off on the wrong foot, I’m not a trollI felt like I wanted to reply because honestly, this thread is just so dismissive and closed off to any other scenarios - to let you know that I am also really open minded about why she did it. The laughing reaction to your post is just so rude.
For what it's worth, I think hearing this name, for whatever reason - has resulted in an emotional response. I think there's some discussion around whether love or fear are the strongest emotions.
Absolutely agree. Radiologist, with the study he’s done, the air in the vessels plus all the other signs of pain etc. There is no doubt in my mind. How many impossibly rare natural scenarios can these babies suffer in her presence? To get better and then die when she returns. It’s going to be one of the worst crimes ever committed imo. Tiny babies, in her care, most vulnerable little people I can think of. They worked so hard to survive and should have gone on to be happy little children.I think it’s been a strong week for the prosecution. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind whatsoever that she’s 100% guilty of all charges, and sadly so much more…
She just sounds so dull and unremarkable with her Corrie and her Strictly and Salsa classes and yet what she’s on trial for is so heinous . The amount of texting she does about work is crazyI felt really sad for her parents in the write up, possibly yesterday's? When her mum said she was really happy that LL was coming home for Christmas. Not sure what the significance of it was, but it really made me feel for her and what she must be going through at the moment.
Also, the texts she was sending seemed so normal and warm, it's hard to link that with someone who could do these crimes, just doesn't fit together in my head.
The curse is brokenDan has started tweeting