Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

struggs123

Chatty Member
The stillbirths are nothing to do with the hospital. They mostly deliver babies who have already sadly died and the hospital has to deliver and report on those figures.

Stillbirths are either that a mother comes in for a routine check and no heartbeat is detected OR comes to hospital with reduced movement and no heartbeat is detected. Not to be confused with intrapartum death, when a baby dies during labour - only 5-7% of stillbirths happen during labour (intrapartum), 88-90% happen before labour (antepartum).

There also wasn't a huge rise in stillbirths, they were pretty consistent but dropped hugely in 2016 (interestingly, when LL was active, so quashes any suggestion of hospital failings being responsible...):

2013 - 8
2014 - 9
2015 - 12
2016 - 2 (A huge drop!)
2017 - 11
2018 - 6

If you smoke, your risk of stillbirth increases by over 50%. Maybe more smokers were pregnant in 2015?
Sometimes poor care does lead to stillbirths though unfortunately. No idea of course if it's the case here but not listening to women regarding reduced movements etc means often the signs and the chance to take action to save the baby is missed (other scenarios also happen but just one).
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 22

PatienceImpatient

Active member
I hope the jury realise how rare and out there the nature of these neonatal deaths are. Babies don’t just go in to respiratory/cardiac arrest with no warning signs, even neonates.

My sister in law had a little boy at 27 weeks a few years before she met my brother. When he came out he was in good condition despite his term and was fully expected to make it. He then started to deteriorate over a number of days - infection, brain haemorrhage, seizures. As he deteriorated, it became evident he wasn’t going to survive and a decision had to be made and they said their goodbyes. The deaths in the LL case are all SO spontaneous. It’s not normal.
 
  • Sad
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 22

avabella

VIP Member
This poor mothers evidence confirms what my gut has told me so far. The standard of care is shambolic. I’m so angry for this lady 😓
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 22

Tofino

VIP Member
I don’t think the stillbirths are relevant to the case tbh, unless the defence use it as evidence for some reason but not sure that’s likely.

Even the CQC report isn’t in evidence yet. So any discussion over either of those things is purely speculative and may lead to biases (which is fine on the thread, I think we are all biased in some way, but something to be mindful of).
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 21

MmmB777

VIP Member
I don't buy that her designated baby was more unwell than child C. The babies in room 1 are 1:1 nursed. At least child C would have been since he wasn't doing well and they were discussing transfer. LL was in a room where she was looking after at least 2 babies, if one of her designated babies was actually this unwell, why wouldn't he have been placed on 1:1 even if they couldn't move him to a higher intensity room?
Why would they make that up? Maybe more unwell is the wrong phrase.. he was presenting with new and concerning symptoms that the senior wanted Letby to be more vigilant with. She asked her to increase obs and get a doctor in to review him- the latter part is recorded in notes so def happened. They were discussing transfer because he was on the cusp of the weight limit but it was a joint decision with the other hospital that keeping him there would be less risky and stressful. I imagine the other hospital used all their info about baby C to come to that decision. What I’m gathering from their evidence is that whether these babies are poorly or not or high risk - these crashes are not only sudden and unexpected but unusual in how they play out. It sounds like everybody got to baby C very quickly - I mean Letby was there herself (🤢) I don’t understand why staff shortages would cause very sudden cardiac arrest in this baby or make him unable to be resuscitated.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 21

crumpets2

Active member
For me, I’m struggling to get behind any scapegoat/make LL for the narrative theory when so much evidence points towards deliberate harm. Of course this is my opinion and I’m willing to be open minded should defence come back with another explanation.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 21

mRsKbRoOkS

VIP Member
I still haven’t seen anything that could make me put her away for life if I was on that jury.

Yes there is a lot of circumstantial evidence but nothing that confirms her guilt so far. She could well just be a bit odd, a bit intrusive, a bit inappropriate, or even none of those things.

I’m keeping an open mind.

I am also finding it quite shocking that the drs are saying pneumonia couldn’t be the cause of death of an 800g baby and there were other worrying clinical factors for him in addition to this. Dr Evan’s credibility has gone down in my mind today. Jmo.
They did explain this, that had it been to do with an infection the baby would have showed signs of deterioration and not suddenly collapsed . All drs, nurses, experts have stated the same so I’m inclined to say that this is accurate.

I do find this confusing. Why would he just come up with that today and risk his credibility? Surely he would have to give a reason how he’s come to that conclusion but that’s not been covered in the reporting.

An independent pathologist might be next to testify and they seem more certain on deliberate harm (from opening statement).

The prosecution added an independent pathlogist said the skin colour changes in Child C were likely caused by prolonged unsuccessful resuscitation.

Child C had pneumonia, but the pathologist concluded Child C died as a result of having an excessive quantity of air injected into his stomach via the nasogastric tube (NGT).


I think child C was always going to be difficult to prove cause of death from looking at the opening statements and the mixed views from experts. But there is still lots of suspicious things about child C.
I agree, I think child c’s case came later. I think what made them take another look was letbys messages and her behaviour. I still say she did it but whether they have enough to prove she did is another matter.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 21
Part of me wants to bow out of following this case so closely, but as a nurse, a mum and now a grandma of a beautiful boy I just can't...I want to believe that another "Beverly Allit" doesn't exist, that a person, part of my profession, who is entrusted with the lives of these tiny babies would not have it in them to do this 😢
As a parent and grandma I can't imagine the pain the families continue to go through💔💔
I am just compelled to stay for the long haul and see it through to the end💔
I'm sure many of us feel this way? Unlike certain FB groups we can all contribute our thoughts and opinions and be respectful of each other!
Not sure what my point is really...other than it's going to get more distressing as the trial moves on and I was thinking, as I say, of bowing out, but I just can't.😢
I’ve read all of your posts across these threads and I just wanted to say even through this forum I can tell you must of been the most kind and compassionate professional nurse. You can honestly feel how kind and caring you are through my phone! Your children and grandchildren are very lucky 🥰
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 21

EllsBellsWells

Chatty Member
This absolutely this. I couldn’t have said it better myself. How many excuses have to be made. I know a lot of people don’t want her to be guilty and why, but seriously some of the excuses being used are a bit ridiculous. And she does not appear to be a particularly good nurse under scrutiny, but that can’t be said either it’s all just more excuses. I also don’t mean to cause any dramas by saying that, and it is not aimed at anyone. But continuous excuses for all her behaviour is just strange to keep hearing. Again it’s mad the difference of opinion on here, hope the jury aren’t like any of us 🤦🏼‍♀️ Luckily they hear and see far more than we do, so do understand a lot of people are interpreting the select bits we are told in different ways, and everyone’s views should be respected
If everyone’s views should be respected can you maybe stop claiming people are making excuses for her? That’s not what is happening at all- we’re all (normally) having polite discussions about the different aspects to this case.

Nobody is making excuses for an alleged murderer? We’re all on a gossip forum discussing a trial that could have many different outcomes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21

Rippedjeanmaybe

VIP Member
I can see why you would think that, but it’s the fact she said she killed them on purpose, to me (and this is just my view) if she had meant what you’ve said, she wouldn’t have added the on purpose bit on. But again it’s all about our own conclusions
I agree. I know loads of people have different views on it, but I don’t see how it can be meant any other way when she says “I killed them on purpose”. She sounds like an angry bitter child with that writing.

I feel like if you were innocent, but struggled with confidence, then maybe you’d write “they died because I wasn’t good enough as a nurse” “if they’re saying it’s my fault then it must be, but how?”.

Surely you wouldn’t say “I killed them on purpose”.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 21

riddleme89

VIP Member
Can’t help but feel sorry for 5hose poor parents having to listen to the day they lost a child so sad 😞
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 21

Tofino

VIP Member
Last thread:

Wiki:

Today’s live link:

90401A32-627B-467F-A95B-DFABDE68C7D2.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 21

MmmB777

VIP Member
I think for me there are a few details missing if we want to describe Letby as just hovering doing her job and being attentive- they were not her designated babies, the parents themselves recall finding her insensitive/inappropriate, she has no long professional caring relationship with the babies or parents but searches them multiple times, in sets.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sick
Reactions: 21

mRsKbRoOkS

VIP Member
Ah I really don’t think the dr is coming off well. I feel like he snapping and getting frustrated don’t necessarily blame him (and I wouldn’t do any better) but I don’t think he is doing a very good job of keeping his cool up there. A couple comments stands out to me as snappy and sarcy and abrupt this one especially -


Mr Myers asks Dr Evans what evidence there is to support that air had been injected into the stomach on June 13.

Dr Evans: "The baby collapsed and died."
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 21

od12839

Member
I'm curious where the text messages go as we move further along. From how upset she seems at the first few deaths I can't imagine how she coped with more and more happening.

She's aware it's always her shift, people keep mentioning it. So by 6,7,8 I'd be losing my mind. I'd be begging people to be honest with me like...am I shit at my job? Am I actually just really bad at this? Is this happening to anyone else or am I just the most unlucky person here?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21