candyland_
VIP Member
How can it be circumstantial when each and every baby collapsed within 2-15 minutes of her being around them? It’s all there in the prosecutions case.
No I get that and I appreciate you apologising. It’s not just you (but I’m conscious of also not trying to make vague finger pointing posts) but I just feel like it can be disheartening when we all have really valid points of view.I’m really sorry that you feel you have to post a disclaimer, I was trying to share points of view too, wasn’t meant as any digs at anyone. Anything I disagree on I would rather say I agree to disagree on rather than have people feel this way from something I’ve said
And Baby E.Letby was the only member of staff present at all babies ABCD deaths and near deaths. In my mind, there is a mixture of all this in these incidents of- compelling evidence of foul play, compelling evidence of her behaving unnaturally and suspiciously both at the scene and away from it, compelling evidence these babies were doing well and on an upward trajectory before interventions from LL, compelling evidence the babies would have otherwise survived. compelling evidence of air embolism, compelling evidence of recovery from whatever was causing them to crash when away from Letby (eg not a pervasive problem). I personally feel this paints an extremely firm picture. Appreciate others won’t.
Well then you need to take that up with the Health Sec and every Clinical Director & Directorate Manager within the NHS not tattle.I say this as someone who does audits on systems and processes in the NHS and other industries - just because you've always done it, does not make it correct and you are risking criminal charges, penalties and worse. We run audits at any point, with more frequency now, and I am always shocked at clinical and admin staff who don't seem to understand that just because you can access something, doesn't mean you should - GDPR and data privacy training is mandated for a reason. Most systems are being updated to flag immediately when someone accesses records they shouldn't - we do this with the Metropolitan police already. The minute someone not on the 'permissions' list accesses a case file, there will be a flag sent to their line manager and they'll be called in for questioning.
Everyone knows people can steal when they want to, it's utterly daft to talk about people doing it as a common thing. It's even dafter to think that someone who's been moved to clerical duties because she's under suspicion for access notes breaching policy and risking a disciplinary. This entire conversation kicked off because someone thought LL on clerical duties was going to be reviewing case notes of a death she was involved in a year ago, so that a year later she could remember what her colleague did, but not what she did.
![]()
ICO warns NHS staff that unlawfully accessing patient records is an offence
The ICO has reminded NHS staff about the potentially serious consequences of prying into patients’ medical records without a valid reason.www.digitalhealth.net
I know I’ve said this multiple times but she admitted to the police she was alone when Baby C collapsed.Doesn't sound like any of the witnesses have been very sure of who was where or what they were doing on the bradys or eventual collapse. I feel like the defence won't have a difficult job of creating doubt around her opportunity.
Regardless of how me and you feel the babies mum felt she was hovering too close for no reason and wanted her to back offI think of the opposite scenario - your baby is dying and you get put in a room and left alone? :-/ then it would be 'they left me in a room on my own with a dying baby'