These aren't particularly evidence though, that's what I'm saying. You could say it's 'context' - but context to what? An accusation. So if your bias (for want of a better word) is that she's guilty, anything contained in those messages will only serve to compound your own belief. I have no idea if she's guilty or not, there's certainly been evidence to support both outcomes in my eyes - but these just don't say much to me personally. As I said, I find it interesting on how they are viewed depending on what angle you are looking at them from, it's not a criticism.