yet interestingly Lucy said in her police interview it would be hard to do?Agree.....easy and can be done quickly and without anyone noticing, sadly
I’m sure they said previously that she had signed for meds on babies in that room when she was working in another room. There’s also the door records.
Just to jump back in, sorry. Am I right in saying threads 1-3 are missing? They seem to start from thread 4 for some reasonHi guys. Just come across this thread so I'm going to go back and read from the beginning. Just a quick hello from me and I hope you're all managing OK with hearing the details from this case as I expect it has been pretty soul destroying
So she doesn’t know what one is but she knows how one would administer one
Wouldn't the door records just be the main door? I've never been on any ward with swipe access to each individual treatment area, just the main door and meds cupboard.
I think yes there would have been evidence, but she could have explained it a way, like she was needed, someone on a break just for an example easy for the defence to cast doubt . However, the texts paint a different picture of her needing to be in there which makes you view it in a very different more sinister way.
Amazing, thankyou
Yeah ...she's talking rubbish and down right lying there
I know there was a fair bit of time taken on the jury selection for this case, could of been because of a few reasons though. IQ wouldn't normally be an issue,
I think each door might have a swipe access because they’ve used the door records previously to put her in room ? at X time.
Was about to say that!!!So she doesn’t know what one is but she knows how one would administer one
What is this supposed to prove? She still comes across obsessive IMO.Just for balance
The colleague replies: "It will be but it does happen to these babies unfortunately."
The colleague recalls a baby who had previously died in the neonatal unit, but had "overwhelming sepsis" so "nothing would have saved that baby".
Letby, in her reply, says: "It's heartbreaking but it's not about me."
Letby: "It's not about me or anybody else, it's those poor parents who have to walk away without their baby."
Letby: "We are a good team and we will get through. You did so so well."
The colleague: "We all did - so lucky to work with such an amazing and supportive team."
I think that’s why the prosecution are using the texts as the defence could offer reasonable explanations for her being in the rooms when she wasn’t meant to be etc but the texts cast doubt on that as it appears she was facilitating it herself rather than them needing her due to staffing levels etc
Exactly what an attention seeker would reply IMOJust for balance
The colleague replies: "It will be but it does happen to these babies unfortunately."
The colleague recalls a baby who had previously died in the neonatal unit, but had "overwhelming sepsis" so "nothing would have saved that baby".
Letby, in her reply, says: "It's heartbreaking but it's not about me."
Letby: "It's not about me or anybody else, it's those poor parents who have to walk away without their baby."
Letby: "We are a good team and we will get through. You did so so well."
The colleague: "We all did - so lucky to work with such an amazing and supportive team."
I don't think anything in those texts screams obsessive to me at all, I just find it fascinating how it can be interpreted differently. If you are looking for something, you'll find it.
