Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

Windowtothewall

Chatty Member
Doxxing is definitely cruel and unneccessary. And I do sympathise with that. But as she herself mentioned in the Metro article, if any one of her dates read her blog they'd have every right to be upset. She even wrote that she knew it was wrong but didn't know how to stop! And this is before she started getting quite nasty in how she wrote about them, and started sharing even more personal information on Twitter about them. So she was aware that what she was doing was wrong, and just ramped it up instead. The blog may have started out as an honest attempt to anonymously document and share her dating journey (and she was very careful in the early years) but that morphed into a callous Twitter follower generating exercise with all attention to anonymity out the window. It was always bound to come crashing down at the rate it was going, getting more and more lax about anonymity, but maybe this way she has stopped it before people she really cares about came across it. And she can go back to blogging and sharing like the old days - quietly and anonymously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4

Windowtothewall

Chatty Member
I mean, she wasn't particularly complimentary about a lot of the men she wrote about on the blog.... Criticism of their facial features, intelligence, sexual performance, the way they spoke, they way they behaved. There was a lot of very negative content on there and a lot of detail. She herself has acknowledged that if they found out, they'd have every right to be upset. And no one actually knows how honest she was or not, other than the men she has written about. So a bit daft to defend her as not having defamed anyone - who really knows!

Also, imagine you're Lockdown Girl, and your friend or you follow LGD on twitter. You (or friend) suddenly recognise your bf from all the detail shared, and now have to read how disparaging he is about you from Twitter. You have to read details about how your bf kissed someone, and how he thinks there's no future. In detail. How is that a nice thing to do to another woman? How is that a nice thing to do to a colleague? And isn't it likely that a single woman or man dating on the apps in London may follow a very popular dating blogger. So no one blogging about their dating life publically can claim to be a considerate or kind human being, or better than anyone on this site. Anyone berating strangers online, whether a blog, or a gossip site is hurting someone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I came across LGD and her blog on Twit and quickly noticed how she was aping Bridget Jones with all the ice cream lark and being a spinster at 40. Her talk of catching feels and telling her dates about these feels didn't fit with a middle aged professional woman who is essentially hard and ambitious. She often tripped up on things in her blog which made me question how much of it was true like when she said she met Charlie at a party which was another lie and tried to make the meeting all Bridget Jones style. She said Charlie was bald and described him as a tough rugged Casanova but Chris is a drip and a weed and has a strange little face.

I’m not sure I believe about this poly life he claims he and his wife lead and I wonder if Livvy knows she’s in a poly marriage. Does anyone know for sure Livvy knows he shags around? He seems crafty and sneaky and how do we know he doesn’t tell women who are gagging for it that he and his wife are both poly so he knows they won’t blab to his wife when he gets tired of having sex with them. In his blogs he says how much he worships Livvy so if that’s true it would drive an arrogant narc like him mad having another man have sex with her. He said how he cried getting down on his knee proposing to her and Livvy says in her blog how she made the seating plan for her big white wedding in a church while Lucy blogged the wedding was a small affair in a pub with just a few friends. It’s lies all the way though so makes all Lucy’s blog questionable. Chris isn’t a looker and he’s such wa bore. He tries to come across deep and arty and sensuous but he’s dull and boring. He looks and sounds a slimy creep and hides his cheap ways to shag desperate women by making out it’s some kind of hedonistic art full of passion. Like when he told Lucy to go downstairs to speak to her car mechanic with his cum dribbling between her legs, how passionate is that. He used Lucy for sex but in his blog he talks about crying with happiness when with his wife and daughter. He’s a narc and a user and unless someone has proof I don’t believe Livvy knows he has bits on the side. This whole degrading business has made Lucy look needy and easy to fool which also seems strange as she isn’t an idiot. The other surprising thing is why a woman of her education and age seems to have a small clique of friends on Twitter who are totally different to her all the way through to her crush on YC who isn’t a looker either and could pass for about 18.










l
Ok so I know for a FACT that Charlie is EA, aka Chris Savory - total utter creep and pervert.

Lucy created situations like the party and the wedding, when I think what was actually going on around that time was he was having a baby, in order to obfuscate and throw people off the scent. But y'all, we're not that stupid! If Chris is shagging around and sliding into all asunder's DMS, people are going to join the dots.

And yeah, you are so right about Chris with his pseudo intellectual arty vibe. Yet it's interspersed with lame jokes, like when he posts signs that he thinks could be read in a dirty way like a sexually frustrated 14 year old. I'm VERY good ar reading people - it's a blessing and a curse, and I can tell you that Chris was a sexually frustrated geek at school, who has never quite let go of that image of himself as an unappealing nerd desperate for girls, and so now, he's like a kid in a candy shop, using Twitter to prey on lonely women and rope them into sex, to sort of try to change his self-image and feel like he's this sexually empowered, appealing, urbane guy when deep down, he still feels like that loser unattractive geek that other girls wanted nothing to do with.

And yeah, Livvy knows. She's active on Twitter - would be hard to miss. She's also blogged about it. She is apparently ok with it as she claims not to feel threatened due to her own strong self worth. I actually believe her, but what I don't think she realises is that Chris is not respecting women. The way he treats women is like they are there to serve a purpose for HIM - giving him sex and an ego boost. He doesn't value them for their intrinsic worth or respect their boundaries or care about their wellbeing and feelings, and for that, I HATE HIM and find him vile and repugnant and the LAST person a self-respecting feminist should be with.

Arghh!

Also I'm loving how Bianca keeps posting anti-doxxing bs, like girl, you dox people your damn self?

And yeah, I doxxed Chris just then but I think he's a piece of shit abuser so #noregrets.

Also, BIANCA DOXXED LUCY. Bianca hates threats. She hates other women coming into her little lame incel snooker dating Twitter clique and taking attention away from her. Lucy was doing that and TRUST ME, Bianca hates it. She will promote a woman outside her little Twitter circle but if it's someone closer, she will destroy them. She's a freak. It's really that simple.

I'm not looking at Bianca's tweets anymore. My life is worth more than this lol. Plus I hate her so it's like self-harm. #Byebitch

Livvy does know about EA shagging around as he's done it since they got together and she's blogged about it numerous times. In fact she seems quite close with his secondary partner (exposing40, who's blog was shared before). Seems like a bit of a raw deal considering she doesn't do it and it often left 'holding the baby' whilst he goes off and shags/spends time with (numerous) other women. Apparently she's completely secure in their relationship and doesn't get jealous at all. I've never quite understood it myself.

Twitter is full of creeps! Still doesn't mean he deserved to have his life ruined the way she did, there was zero evidence he was a paedophile, Bianca just jumped on the assumption and started a witch hunt, as she's done many times before.
If Bianca hates paedophiles THAT MUCH, why doesn't she become a paedophile hunter? Or volunteer for a charity supporting victims? She doesn't give a fuck about paedophiles, she just likes to hound people and destroy them. It's called being a psychopath.
And anyway, it seems this guy just said something a bit clumsy that got misconstrued...? He wasn't sharing or soliciting child porn or trying to arrange a meet...?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3

#gtf

Member
I appreciate being dramatic and over exaggerating on her blogs may have been intentional for attention but can't wrap my brain around someone acting like a whiny bitter cow thinking it made her likeable.

Enough people told her over and over how unbearable she was, but she was arrogant about it and unwilling to change. Lucy was her own worst enemy, more issues than vogue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
And this says it all, if it’s not blowing smoke up her arse she doesn’t want to see it. Surely if your putting your life online in this way, you must expect a variety of opinions?
EB4DC8B2-5D72-428C-8DFA-5FA097BF498B.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3

Pinklight

New member
I think that's why she's so annoying. Her entire lucygoesdating account is supposed to show the real side to dating but she's not authentic or sincere in her tweets or blogs. Everything has to have a dramatic, shock angle to bring in the followers. I think she believes her own mediocre hype.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3

Katiekins84

New member
I never see these replies from Bianca or any Lucy supporters. Where do they go? I'm the same as some others. I joined this after discovering others felt the same way about Lucy. Loved the blog, hated her twitter. Just vile. Dont feel sorry at all for any of them with how much information they've shared about innocent people for followers.
I don't know much about Bianca until this thread changed towards her so not much to contribute 🤷‍♀️
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3

Acorncollecter

VIP Member
I think the whole idea of someone from a senior position expressing interest in a junior while not forced, is still riddled with red flags as we often hear of subordinate young women too scared to say no to their superiors in a work environment. In his case knowing that she helped him get more money and she bought him an expensive gift after their trip - it would seem he tried to say no in the best way he could yet she kept trying to get him on her team because "they work so well together". As to the piano lady- was that not the catalyst that got the whole Lucy reveal started? Didn't piano fall for Al who wasn't interested as he was still into Lucy?

As to shutting down this thread...theres is an option to request a take down..I wonder if Bella ever went that route?
Yep to Piano lady. She's just a nasty piece of work. Plays the victim, craves attention and then stirs up shit about other people on twitter though she is in some bitchy groups of woman. Keep going love....you only have sad fat old men who try to grab your attention. As anyone half decent and normal wouldn't touch you with a barge pole. She will probably use this to prove her point that she's bullied on here though she is doing it to others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3

Brightlife

New member
I still think it is not Bianca. I think it is closer to home. Even when Lucy and Charlie parted ways, there was still some interaction and indeed EA_unadorned wrote a lengthy piece for Lucy's blog which even his wife commented on. Then they appeared to be a massive falling out and she finally got rid of the narcissistic Charlie, he was used to being fawned upon not rejected publicly. His "partner" (not the wife) wrote a lengthy piece on how happy she was that it was over because her hierarchy had been disturbed. What I cannot understand is why she deleted the post immediately after it was mentioned here? There was no reason to delete it? And why have the people who unmasked Lucy now decided not to post here any further? I noticed EA is a Metro Life Blogger, omg they employ predators to preach the alternative lifestyle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3

jofessonm

New member
If you call Bella Falk out on it on Twitter or Instagram, she deletes it and blocks you.

Maybe you shouldn't leave so many obvious identifiers if you're trying to remain anonymous... if I were her friends/dates and I found out what she'd been doing on her dating blog (which is pretty embarrassing for her), I'd feel violated.

I think she kind of wants to be found out. On the Twitter comments for one of her cringe-worthy photo attempts to be "sexy," she replied to someone that "sadly" the current man she's obsessed with will likely never see the photo because it's on her Lucy Twitter.

 

Attachments

Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I do actually feel some sympathy towards her on the work front as I have no doubt she works very hard and is extremely conscientious but I also think her colleague has had a lucky escape.
The universe is sending you a very obvious message here Lucy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3

SallyB721

New member
For me it was when someone posted her address (I think or maybe just location?) that I thought it went a bit far. Yes someone could probably find that out from just her name but that bit still felt like it could have been avoided.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3

SimplySarahLou

New member
Does anyone follow her blog or on Twitter? She strikes me as very unpleasant with impossibly high standards. I’m all for not settling, but she has so many things that are an instant ‘no’ for her I’m not surprised she hasn’t found anyone. Would be interested to hear if anyone follows her.
I used to but stopped for your reasons plus she’s so arrogant that she can’t quite believe why men don’t fall at her feet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I’m beginning to think much of what Lucy posts is bullshit, there’s so many things just not adding up.

Bella says on 22/02 that in 2 weeks she’ll be in Mexico, got her suitcase out a week ago and had her vaccine ready.

Lucy says that after being in contact with Covid last weekend so long as she doesn’t test positive, once she’s out of isolation the trip will be fine. And she’s now tested positive on a LFT. Now surely if this whole trip/program/filming etc rested on a negative PCR test, why wouldn’t work or Lucy herself just book a private test where someone comes to your house to swab you? They are only about £100 so not expensive really.

Also still no mention that she’s had her vaccine and given that it would be a big talking point that she’s tested positive before immunity kicked in, I just think it’s all so odd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3

Iwantyoutoknow22

Chatty Member
Wow. Reading all that together it’s so dramatic and obviously fictitious. She probably wrote that all down on phone one lonely night in her hotel planning to space it all out over time
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3

Iwantyoutoknow22

Chatty Member
Truly awful woman, a narcissist of the highest order
She’s deluded if she thinks her colleague fancies her, they work in a small industry with a lot of free lancing. He’s just protecting himself for future projects because he knows she can either get him work or put the boot in
Definitely! Did you see her the other day fishing for people to say that he definitely fancies her as he went a bit red on a Zoom call?? Grow up! Embarrassing
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 3