Liz Jones #7 If she's got two faces, why does she wear that horrible one?

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Can someone please recap who David 1 and David 2 are as I have no clue?!

Thank you!
David 1 is Dscrace, aka the Dirty Baker.
David 2 (I am informed) was the date that got within 100 meters of a date with Juggo, did a U-turn and got the duck out of Dodge.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 12
I’m not happy about Liz writing about Nic. She’s the employee and there’s a lot of reasons why it’s so wrong.
Plus to keep calling her an animal behaviourist is disrespectful to people who have studied long and hard for their qualifications.
My daughter uses Bach remedies on our horses. I can’t give an opinion on their efficacy because I feel using the remedies is calming to my daughter who can then achieve her training goals which I suppose goes some way to showing their efficacy.
Nic is an employee and deserves respect, other people real or imaginary that she writes about are not dependent upon her financially.
Don't feel too sorry for Bebb. She was the cipher Juggo used to liquidate a arge number of assets and not declare them during her bankruptcy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
That text and the "hypothetical" question smacks of blackmail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Don't feel too sorry for Bebb. She was the cipher Juggo used to liquidate a arge number of assets and not declare them during her bankruptcy.
Omg that is not good. I didn’t know that.
The posts on here are tailing off. Last post was Tuesday before today. I’m thinking her relevance is diminishing, she has lied, recycled and created fantasies about her “life”, she pivots from one standpoint and back again that her madness is making her irrelevant.
She doesn’t understand her readers are not mad as boxes of frogs. 🐸
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
You do have to wonder when the DM is going to pull the plug on this tripe. The constant references to shows/people that were last really relevant back in the 90s is not going to interest new readers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14
You do have to wonder when the DM is going to pull the plug on this tripe. The constant references to shows/people that were last really relevant back in the 90s is not going to interest new readers.
Who under 35 is going to understand all the SATC references, given that it ended on TV in 2004?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
Who under 35 is going to understand all the SATC references, given that it ended on TV in 2004?
It's been recently re-released on Netflix (not in my country) so interest has repeaked with young viewers, plus there was the execrable sequel over the past few years. So actually Liz is inadvertently connecting with something the under 35s may know!
 
It's been recently re-released on Netflix (not in my country) so interest has repeaked with young viewers, plus there was the execrable sequel over the past few years. So actually Liz is inadvertently connecting with something the under 35s may know!
I'm struggling to see why the yoot would engage with something that's aged so poorly (insert joke here...).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Whoops! Juggo's been beaten to slagging off the Duchess of Sussex's festive special! Maybe she dozed off...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Who under 35 is going to understand all the SATC references, given that it ended on TV in 2004?
Sadly it seems they will never get shot of her.

Maybe they use her to cling on to an aging demographic who their research analysis shows purchase things from their sponsors and advertisers?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Sadly it seems they will never get shot of her.

Maybe they use her to cling on to an aging demographic who their research analysis shows purchase things from their sponsors and advertisers?
I'm part of an aging demographic but there's no way I purchase things from sponsors or advertisers in the Mail!! I've also never watched SATC or any of the other 80s and 90s programmes she burbles on about. Maybe I'm just weird ... ??
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
I'm part of an aging demographic but there's no way I purchase things from sponsors or advertisers in the Mail!! I've also never watched SATC or any of the other 80s and 90s programmes she burbles on about. Maybe I'm just weird ... ??
You are not weird just very discerning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I'll take Things that Never Happened for $500 please, Alex...
Yawn. As someone who lives in the country with dogs and cats, what a load of rit. What is the problem with jeans and dogs, or jerseys and hay? She's never looked at what people are actually wearing. Plus, I thought that she didn't have friends when she was on one of her woe is me, pity me wails. My socks aren't wet because I wear suitable footwear outside.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
No comments about this week’s dreary since Saturday 5.48. Maybe we have all reached peak boredom with her label worshipping limited life.
oooh the ignominy of not even being tattled about.
It’s a little sad for me because I have enjoyed all the comments from fellow tattlers. I feel like it’s the end of an era. Thanks to all contributors who have made me laugh for so many weekends.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 13
No comments about this week’s dreary since Saturday 5.48. Maybe we have all reached peak boredom with her label worshipping limited life.
oooh the ignominy of not even being tattled about.
It’s a little sad for me because I have enjoyed all the comments from fellow tattlers. I feel like it’s the end of an era. Thanks to all contributors who have made me laugh for so many weekends.
Exactly this, LJ and her wall eyed obstinate blindness is what brought me to Tattle. Thank goodness that Merkle’s idiocy is still in full flow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5