This is key. The influencer issue is bigger than LLL alone and brands need to be made aware of customers feelings on it. Personal attacks - and that's how it will be perceived/presented - will result in tears, claims of bullying, trolling etc and is an easy default position. Far harder to address is cold hard fact presented in these threads.I dont disagree with any of what you say. I just think its one of those situations that could easily go against us either if not very tactfully done. I think promoting this site rather than attack her personally might serve the cause better. Bring people here to make up their own minds as opposed to something that could be interpreted as poublic humilation. But just my opinion and welcome the discussion.
Very well put. Now, I don’t want to slag off brands either though. For me it’s the cunning way she went about things. She wasn’t transparent.This is key. The influencer issue is bigger than LLL alone and brands need to be made aware of customers feelings on it. Personal attacks - and that's how it will be perceived/presented - will result in tears, claims of bullying, trolling etc and is an easy default position. Far harder to address is cold hard fact presented in these threads.
Not at all!! I mean aside from anything else, the web of suppliers linked with her companies etc.....no wonder she sells so hardVery well put. Now, I don’t want to slag off brands either though. For me it’s the cunning way she went about things. She wasn’t transparent.
Well said , completely agree , transparency is what we are asking for.LLL has been exceptionally quiet so I agree with many of the comments here that she is struggling to react. I won’t be watching the live this morning, but I wouldn’t like to see her being ambushed live either. Personally I think our cause is much better served by showing some charity and use the opportunity only to direct people here for a discussion. It’s quite possible she would take advantage of the opportunity to be portrayed as the victim and play the troll card, so we should show new people that this is not the case at all. If anybody needs to be ambushed it’s the brands who push the whole influencer scene.
But now that we have the attention of LLL Limited, this would be a summary of some of the great advice that has been shared here:
- You refuse to see your followers as your customers – that’s a mistake. There may be no direct financial transactions between you and your followers, but that’s just semantics. We have been funding your enterprise.
- No enterprise can afford not to listen to their customers, in fact many invest heavily in this because its value. Engaging with your customers early can avoid dirty laundry being aired on public feedback forums.
- Social responsibility is important part of any modern enterprise. Granted it won’t fund the LV bags as quickly but it’s great for the conscience.
- Your followers are a little older and a little wiser than most other instahun groupies, there needs to be some substance to your content. You won’t get away BS and keep your original followers. If you had sought feedback this would probably have been made very apparent to you before now.
- There is no shame is admitting you have made mistakes. In fact, it might make you more relatable. Maybe this is an opportunity to prove your worth and acknowledge the debate. And god forbid you might even see the opportunity to promote a campaign that would clean up this industry a little and make it more accountable. Afterall, most of us on here have acknowledged the flaws in the industry – the brands entice you with money most couldn't say no to. It will have to change sooner or later. But maybe someone with your wealth and platform could challenge them for the greater good. Now that’s what I would call a “win win”.
- Having people who care enough to tell you the truth is something to behold!
It could be all part of her gearing up to play victim again. I wouldn’t trust her tbh. Don’t forget that Tattle is impacting her sales targets!!Definitely agree girls shes shook and her tone of voice was so quiet this morning! Theres something bothering her...wonder what!
The Live could be a test to see what’s said on it. You may be right about it being a tester. This one has balls of steal. We need to remember this.It could be all part of her gearing up to play victim again. I wouldn’t trust her tbh. Don’t forget that Tattle is impacting her sales targets!!
Of course! You're right she plays the victim well. I know people who know her she is not nice to deal with in the office either!It could be all part of her gearing up to play victim again. I wouldn’t trust her tbh. Don’t forget that Tattle is impacting her sales targets!!
I think this thread Is an eye opener. I knew people wouldn’t comment on her live (as that wouldn’t be the way to go about it). She’s gearing up for something alright. Off to Dublin today lads. Don’t panic though, she won’t put her hand in her pocket so wouldn’t be too excited.Of course! You're right she plays the victim well. I know people who know her she is not nice to deal with in the office either!
She’s like a presenter from those infomercials that were on TV back in the day, all obvious questions and faux surpriseAbout 500 on the live.
She is shocked that that bronzer took the white look off her face?! What did she think bronzer did? Lads isn’t make up just bananas
There was a few comments sayin to check out tattleI think this thread Is an eye opener. I knew people wouldn’t comment on her live (as that wouldn’t be the way to go about it). She’s gearing up for something alright. Off to Dublin today lads. Don’t panic though, she won’t put her hand in her pocket so wouldn’t be too excited.
Were there? The comments were going up fast and she didn’t save it to her grid either which is normally what she does. Also, I thought the live was to show off Blanc canvas brushes? But, it turned out to be a benefit live instead? Am I wrong? Couldn’t watch much of it as an sickened by her greed.There was a few comments sayin to check out tattle
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?