Right but she had already plead guilty, this was a sentencing not a trial and you stated 'provocation'. The Menkil health would have already been recorded and given in a pre-sentencing report to the judge. It can then have some bearing on the length/ type of sentence. What KP's solicitor said (element of provocation) was in a statement read out in court that wasn't even necessary when someone has plead guilty. It was her side of events, not an actual, lawful mitigation. It's pretty much KP shouting 'not fair' in legal terms, after admitting she did the thing she shouldn't have.she was able to claim her MH was affected though, and then this was taken into account. She got around the actual factor of an RO by using all of her stories of woe and selling stories on KH, who doesn’t have an RO against her. KP clearly was sending KH endless abusive text messages, and it tipped over where she broke a rule of her RO triggered by MP posting the kids on IG and all the captions she used to write. It’s a series of events that wasn’t unprovoked. She broke the RO, but her mitigating factor was her mental health and she’s continued to blame KH for this for a long time. So this mitigating factor was taken into account - her Mh issues
No Ioan G has never said one single public word.
Actual severe provocation, might be considered by a judge but it's very rare and has a specific use in the courts. otherwise, everyone who hounds an ex-wife or partner and breaks a restraining order could say they were provoked by absolutely anything. This wasn't the case with what Michelle did. KP couldn't use 'provocation' as a mitigation because she's not been abused by Michelle.
---
A poster on the KP thread is feeling very positive about something to do with KP's latest allegation.
Last edited: