Keepingupwithkirstylea:14 No job, no friends, wasting her life.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Still doesn’t mean she can have lunch with his sister and her husband, that only covers the child.
No it doesn't. It means the two households can act as one household, it's not just for childcare.

Deffo not under 1 the sister is a twit also she should be taking more care when pregnant not hanging out with the pair of super spreaders
Seems like the household is that way out which is probably why Kirsty is so welcomed there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
No it doesn't. It means the two households can act as one household, it's not just for childcare.


Seems like the household is that way out which is probably why Kirsty is so welcomed there.
No a childcare bubble is just for childcare no other reason
66B2D35C-4026-4DBD-A349-45E3C8E5B46F.png
 
No it doesn't. It means the two households can act as one household, it's not just for childcare.


Seems like the household is that way out which is probably why Kirsty is so welcomed there.
You can only mix the households if the sister was a single parent household, and she isn’t.
 
3 stories on her account of Daniel tickling her. YAWNNNN!

3 days on plan out of the week. Back to baking brownies and eating them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
You can only mix the households if the sister was a single parent household, and she isn’t.
if you have a child under the age of one you can bubble with another household apparently, either single parent or 2 parent family x
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
if you have a child under the age of one you can bubble with another household apparently, either single parent or 2 parent family x
The kid is not 1 though unless they are counting the foetus.

just another example of selfish Kirsty breaking the rules whilst preaching that every one else should follow them.

that tickling video is so pathetic kind of thing you do when your 12 and why would you film it abs why would you post it the girls insane .
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 3
The kid is not 1 though unless they are counting the foetus.

just another example of selfish Kirsty breaking the rules whilst preaching that every one else should follow them.

that tickling video is so pathetic kind of thing you do when your 12 and why would you film it abs why would you post it the girls insane .
ohh no I don’t imagine she’s keeping to the rules and the kid is under one lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Is she only on her ‘plan’ for 3 days of the week now suppose she is starting from the beginning again.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 4
if you have a child under the age of one you can bubble with another household apparently, either single parent or 2 parent family x
It’s only if you’re a one parent family that you can bubble with another household, and your child has to be under a certain age. There’s absolutely no way that his sister and her husband can go round Pennfold’s for lunch, they’re breaking the rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
You're getting confused about childcare bubbles and support bubbles. Childcare is just 2 households where one has a child under 14. Support applies to single person households, children under 1 and children with disabilities. Either way, it's a bleeping moot point since under no circumstances should you be meeting socially with your support or childcare bubbles. Shes a piss take.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
So she didn't hit her steps yesterday again, no mention of calories, but has clearly went over again.. Like why make a huge song and dance about smashing March/losing 7lb when she literally goes 3 days before falling off the wagon? It's not all bad though, all her tagging and begging paid off, she got gifted drinks to try 🙄
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
You can only mix the households if the sister was a single parent household, and she isn’t.
Nope, not true! If you have a child under one or a child under five who has a disability requiring constant care then you can create a support bubble with another household. This isn't just for childcare.

You're getting confused about childcare bubbles and support bubbles. Childcare is just 2 households where one has a child under 14. Support applies to single person households, children under 1 and children with disabilities. Either way, it's a bleeping moot point since under no circumstances should you be meeting socially with your support or childcare bubbles. Shes a piss take.
Yeah you can meet socially otherwise what's the point of the support bubble. You class yourselves as one household 😊

Either way the child isn't under one anyway so non of this applied to her.

No a childcare bubble is just for childcare no other reason
View attachment 469085
Correct. But I was not talking about a childcare bubble 😊
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Nope, not true! If you have a child under one or a child under five who has a disability requiring constant care then you can create a support bubble with another household. This isn't just for childcare.


Yeah you can meet socially otherwise what's the point of the support bubble. You class yourselves as one household 😊

Either way the child isn't under one anyway so non of this applied to her.


Incorrect
If you're a single adult or an adult with a disability. It's aimed to stop loneliness or to enable carers. So my mother could look after my grandad who has cancer. Not so that bleep can make bleeping pizza with Penfolds family.

I don't care if she wants to break the rules after preaching about sticking to them, she's a cock. But to do it in such a public way is ridiculous. Its my grandads funeral I'm a couple of weeks. I can't even be with my family properly to say goodbye because of the restrictions but this twit is advertising about making pizza with her (not even) in-laws
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6

Have a read here. It clearly states that you can form a household support bubble and class yourselves as one household if the child was under 1 on 2nd December and same for child with a disability needing constant care and under five. I'm not making this up. And it is for socialising aswell as you're acting as one household. Read it lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

Have a read here. It clearly states that you can form a household support bubble and class yourselves as one household if the child was under 1 on 2nd December and same for child with a disability needing constant care and under five. I'm not making this up. And it is for socialising aswell as you're acting as one household. Read it lol
But he's not under 1 or under 5 with a disability? And the sister isn't single? So again, it's a moot point?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
But as someone has said, neither of those situations apply to Kirsty so the family can't use them as an excuse to be in each others houses.

Like I pondered earlier, the only reason it would be allowed is if the child is under one or under five with a disability
needing constant care. None of those situations apply here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
But as someone has said, neither of those situations apply to Kirsty so the family can't use them as an excuse to be in each others houses.

Like I pondered earlier, the only reason it would be allowed is if the child is under one or under five with a disability
needing constant care. None of those situations apply here.
But thats exactly what I'm saying, none of this applies. They're not in a support bubble or a childcare bubble. She's just a bleep with double standards
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
But he's not under 1 or under 5 with a disability? And the sister isn't single? So again, it's a moot point?
Hi, I guess you must have missed my comment before where I pondered a reason and it was said that couldn't be a reason. Someone earlier said that it couldn't be a reason for households in general to mix when it actually was.

So not a moot point as I was simply clarifying that I was correct about how social bubbles can be formed.... 😬

But thats exactly what I'm saying, none of this applies. They're not in a support bubble or a childcare bubble. She's just a bleep with double standards
I've already clarified it doesn't apply to Kirsty. It was a conversation with someone who said I was incorrect. I was clarifying that I was not 🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Hi, I guess you must have missed my comment before where I pondered a reason and it was said that couldn't be a reason. Someone earlier said that it couldn't be a reason for households in general to mix when it actually was.

So not a moot point as I was simply clarifying that I was correct about how social bubbles can be formed.... 😬


I've already clarified it doesn't apply to Kirsty. It was a conversation with someone who said I was incorrect. I was clarifying that I was not 🤣
Ok, no worries
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
5 days into a challenge to hit 10k steps a day and she’s only managed two 🙈🙈 Absolute cringe. It’s not difficult to hit 10k steps a day at all with a bit of effort. It just means going for an actual walk and not sitting watching Netflix and eating blondies 🤦🏽‍♀️
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.