Morning all,
I have one question.. Can it be proved she was driving?
This is my No 1 concern about this case. She was NEXT to the car, not in it… I hope I’m wrong..
Her behaviour pattern over the last 6 months has been incredibly helpful in terms of behaviour analysis.
I just want to clarify she ISNT homeless. She would be granted an amount each month for property rental. However, she no longer warrants a large property as she does not have any of the children for long periods of time. At best she could claim for a 1 or 2 bed property.
Currently she’s paying the mortgage for MM but she ISNT paying off the arrears. As mentioned previously eviction proceedings can be costly and drawn out… it appears this is Katie’s chosen path….. AGAIN!
I have one question.. Can it be proved she was driving?
This is my No 1 concern about this case. She was NEXT to the car, not in it… I hope I’m wrong..
Her behaviour pattern over the last 6 months has been incredibly helpful in terms of behaviour analysis.
I just want to clarify she ISNT homeless. She would be granted an amount each month for property rental. However, she no longer warrants a large property as she does not have any of the children for long periods of time. At best she could claim for a 1 or 2 bed property.
Currently she’s paying the mortgage for MM but she ISNT paying off the arrears. As mentioned previously eviction proceedings can be costly and drawn out… it appears this is Katie’s chosen path….. AGAIN!