Haha, yeah 'it's bigger on the inside!'
Katie Price #92 On the 12th day of xmas, the judge said to KP, no more get out of jail cards.
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Katie Price Threads Wiki
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Mums of drink-drive victims blast Katie after 'little princess' spared jail
THE mums of two drink-drive victims have blasted Katie Price after she was today spared jail for flipping her car in a horror crash. The women, whose relatives were killed by drink drivers, describ…
www.thesun.co.uk
Shouldn't it be titled D-D-D Day
We’re seeing it at 1025 so will be home in plenty of timeI am watching the new Spider-Man film at 3.15 tomorrow. Son has begged me not to go on social media tomorrow so I don’t see any spoilers. But… checking on Tattle to see if Krusty is in the clink doesn’t count surely…?
It's been said that she took a massive lump sum from the accounts without his knowledge.
I am SO excited about today, I have butterflies in my stomach 
Will we know what is said in court?
She’s definitely going down in my opinion today. The police were mortified they couldn’t get drink driving to stick last time, so had to get her on the reduced ‘drunk in charge’ instead. They knew it was her driving and crashing that day. And now she’s done it again. This time they’ve got her and will do all they can to make sure she gets punished accordingly!!! Going down!!
Unbelievable isn't it? Can't take away from her the years she grafted and she has nothing to show for it......
I think its like OP has said, she went for a consultation, no way has she had anything invasive done at this point.
Woohoo, Woooooo here we go! Isn't it telling that even this week Afp has been totally silent, haven't heard a squeak from any of them for weeks. I'm wondering if there's been a massive fall out over Coal Scuttle and the way she's behaved since the accident. She did after all make her mother look pretty stupid asking for privacy etc.
I did notice that The sister has started putting likes on her insta posts lately.Then again,The kids clothing range ( God help us all) is launching in January.Naf wear for the children of the tasteless.Woohoo, Woooooo here we go! Isn't it telling that even this week Afp has been totally silent, haven't heard a squeak from any of them for weeks. I'm wondering if there's been a massive fall out over Coal Scuttle and the way she's behaved since the accident. She did after all make her mother look pretty stupid asking for privacy etc.
I think a lot of legal people (including myself obviously) will be very interested to see what happens.
The main 'sticky point' will be her previous convictions.
Finding a starting point is rather tricky. They can argue the starting point would be Category 3.
That in itself would be a 12-16 month ban and a band c fine. As she has had multiple bans within the past 10 years that bumps the disqualification to 36-40 months.
What is important is the statutory aggravating factors. This is where her previous convictions come in and is the area likely to cause most problems.
It should be pretty easy for the court to be shown she hasn't taken the nature of her pervious convictions into regard. That she has a long history of drink driving.
Aggravating factors also come into play. Failure to follow a current court order and causing an accident. Meaning the seriousness of the offence has increased.
Mitigating factors then are taken into account. Realistically she can only try a couple of these. Remorse is thrown out as she has committed the same crime multiple times. Sole/Primary carer for a dependent relative is the interesting one. Harvey is now in care elsewhere so she cannot claim to be the primary carer.
Which pretty much leaves her mental health as a mitigating factor. A competent judge would ask for medical records at this point. A note from dodgy Dave the Dr would not do. She would have to show history of receiving treatment by specialists.
Most judges would see instantly the pattern of 'reaching out for help' when she is in legal trouble. And then stopping when those procedures have ended or been suspended.
The fact she has already had a court case for driving whilst disqualified should mean she is bumped to the high end of Category 2. And then add to that she was drunk, had no insurance, owned a car when disqualified and caused an accident should bump her into Category 1.
If it was a normal person they would be getting at least 12 weeks in the slammer.
Her defence will try and ram home that she pleaded guilty on her first court appearance so thus qualifies for the reduction of sentence under the criminal justice act. Which means a reduction of a 3rd of the sentence if given one. That she has been to rehab, has mental issues that won't improve in jail. That she wants to change etc
The question will be if the judges can see through that charade? If they buy it she will get a medium level community order and probably a further 3 year ban.
If they don't buy it, they will give her an 8 week prison sentence and a 5+ year ban.
The main 'sticky point' will be her previous convictions.
Finding a starting point is rather tricky. They can argue the starting point would be Category 3.
That in itself would be a 12-16 month ban and a band c fine. As she has had multiple bans within the past 10 years that bumps the disqualification to 36-40 months.
What is important is the statutory aggravating factors. This is where her previous convictions come in and is the area likely to cause most problems.
It should be pretty easy for the court to be shown she hasn't taken the nature of her pervious convictions into regard. That she has a long history of drink driving.
Aggravating factors also come into play. Failure to follow a current court order and causing an accident. Meaning the seriousness of the offence has increased.
Mitigating factors then are taken into account. Realistically she can only try a couple of these. Remorse is thrown out as she has committed the same crime multiple times. Sole/Primary carer for a dependent relative is the interesting one. Harvey is now in care elsewhere so she cannot claim to be the primary carer.
Which pretty much leaves her mental health as a mitigating factor. A competent judge would ask for medical records at this point. A note from dodgy Dave the Dr would not do. She would have to show history of receiving treatment by specialists.
Most judges would see instantly the pattern of 'reaching out for help' when she is in legal trouble. And then stopping when those procedures have ended or been suspended.
The fact she has already had a court case for driving whilst disqualified should mean she is bumped to the high end of Category 2. And then add to that she was drunk, had no insurance, owned a car when disqualified and caused an accident should bump her into Category 1.
If it was a normal person they would be getting at least 12 weeks in the slammer.
Her defence will try and ram home that she pleaded guilty on her first court appearance so thus qualifies for the reduction of sentence under the criminal justice act. Which means a reduction of a 3rd of the sentence if given one. That she has been to rehab, has mental issues that won't improve in jail. That she wants to change etc
The question will be if the judges can see through that charade? If they buy it she will get a medium level community order and probably a further 3 year ban.
If they don't buy it, they will give her an 8 week prison sentence and a 5+ year ban.
Thanks Stmarco, that clarified things for me.
this is really interesting, thanks for sharing your insight into the system.
I'm wondering if she'll bring up the assault, that that worsened her MH, but that would surely mean dropping Carl in it?
Hope there is a legion of sane and vocal folk outside Crawley magistrates court today at 2 pm to let this disgusting wretch and all with a responsibility for keeping the law-abiding public safe know that jail is the only solution here.
Last edited:
I don't think she would want to bring that up as it would open a huge can of worms for her.
If the details of that night are released to the court, it would most likely provide further evidence of her own character.
She has to be sentenced this time around for sure, any one that wasn't a so called "celeb" would be. She wasn't thinking of her kids when she decided to take drugs drink and go driving at 6 am in the morning. If she didn't crash how many more times would she do it??? Or how many more times has she done it in the past and not been caught????? She is definitely not the full shilling but so are many others but they don't endanger other peoples lives. She was only blessed she didn't kill or injure anyone else in that crash. Throw the book at her as she couldn't care less about anyone only herself.
- Status