liar liar
VIP Member
No because the Court of Rolls is a separate institution. They are solely interested in her upholding the terms agreed under IVA and her subsequent excuses of mental health problems and a problem with her accountant (whilst sitting on a beach on a 3 week in the Maldives). The accountant problem never was anything and simply a delaying tactic as was the stay at The Priory. Now they will insist that she answers the questions put to her and provides the appropriate evidence to support her non-compliance - her plea that 'Cole has paid for evryfink' is not going to wash now nor that 'everyfink was free or work-related' because work = earnings.Of course but they don't have to answer those questions. Not unless they have been charged with something.
The point being if the investigators have evidence that she has been sending money to CW to hide her income they would have used it by now. It would no longer be a bankruptcy hearing it would be a criminal investigation.