I was in bed and played this on my laptop. Two of my puddens who had been asleep, got up and came over to see what the noise was....! I thought it was coincidence at first but when I played the second video, they did it again...! Some note in that screeching really reached out to them...!Fuck me, the neighbourhood cats have just mobbed me!
This is a form of abuse. It's sick, there were rumours of it a while back and she's showed she has no boundaries with Jnr when various things have been filmed.Junior has had enough. Last time he saw her, as DC said, she was very drunk. Added to that, she did her usual trying to embarrass J about his girlfriend. Asking if he'd Fck'd her, in front of the other kids. Her insinuating Claire is to blame for not being able to attend anything that J & P are at, is scandalous. Think she needs to keep her dangerous, sick potty mouth well & truly SHUT. Although I'm sure she will never be welcome at any function/work situations, that Peter, Emily & Claire attend with P & J. Thank goodness P & J live with Peter & Emily & youngest kids have been removed from her clutches.
Do we believe she has actually met Lego Boy's mum? The Price clan will only be sucking up to Lego, as it make's life easier for them, her having someone like this prat at her beck & call & driving her around.
She could have just said 'No Comment' to everything. Get her used to saying that phrase when she's interviewed under caution again at police station or by forensic accountants if she's being investigated & interviewed for FRAUD.I've never heard an interview where the person says, 'I don't know' once let alone more times.
I lost count and I ain't going back to listen to that repetitiveagain
I didn't know she had said that to him - how disgusting! Definitely abusive and she didn't care at all!This is a form of abuse. It's sick, there were rumours of it a while back and she's showed she has no boundaries with Jnr when various things have been filmed.
View attachment 2950897
Ahhh exactly what F4J mentioned.This is a form of abuse. It's sick, there were rumours of it a while back and she's showed she has no boundaries with Jnr when various things have been filmed.
View attachment 2950897
If the kids were taken from her under a public court case - as in led by local authority (not public in the sense that anyone would be privy to information) rather than a private court battle for custody led by another parents legal team then the kids would still be under a child protection plan and all parties on both sides would need to attend regular CIN meetings. DV could be the freedom course that victims / perpetrators would have to atttend. The drug appointment could be similar. Like CA / NA. Local authorities have different classes / group names they will send parents on, she would need to attend these to prove to the courts / SW they she is complying to 1) keep up with contact with the children or 2) for the courts to see that the children might go back to her at some point. If she doesn’t consistently comply. The courts would then be able to make a final decision on custody. IMO the kids were taken from her by LA as they were at risk and KH wasn’t suitable in the immediate instance at this time (not saying he won’t in the future). She has no self awareness at all. Can’t believe she was stupid enough to show that calendarWell that confirms some of the stuff I heard. She has been bleating on about PTSD and ADHD to certain officials but the only thing that was actually proven at the time and had an impact on anything was her being an addict. So finally she has at least agreed to be in some sort of treatment for it and had to accept it was a problem. ...... It would also point to it being a factor in the kids being away from her.
As DC said though, doesn't mean she'll stick to no drugs.
I can see why @SmillieKylie didn't want to share some bits of the calendar, it concerns the kids. It just confirms what we've all been saying, they're not with her.
I also speculated yesterday that getting the BH postponed could not be down to an 'open ended' mental health issue as the court need a time frame for the MH issues to be cured...but drug treatment would have an end point. I would say it's quite likely she's had to admit her 'fragile' state was at least partly because of drugs and that's how she's got the BH adjourned.
---
Could it be Domestic Violence? Her attending some sort of group therapy as a victim or perpetrator
They did, didn't they? Not many people wanted to believe it because it would be to horrendous to think about, especially as J & B were still with her at the time!Ahhh exactly what F4J mentioned.
Yep, they were taken from her and not just a custody battle.If the kids were taken from her under a public court case - as in led by local authority (not public in the sense that anyone would be privy to information) rather than a private court battle for custody led by another parents legal team then the kids would still be under a child protection plan and all parties on both sides would need to attend regular CIN meetings. DV could be the freedom course that victims / perpetrators would have to atttend. The drug appointment could be similar. Like CA / NA. Local authorities have different classes / group names they will send parents on, she would need to attend these to prove to the courts / SW they she is complying to 1) keep up with contact with the children or 2) for the courts to see that the children might go back to her at some point. If she doesn’t consistently comply. The courts would then be able to make a final decision on custody. IMO the kids were taken from her by LA as they were at risk and KH wasn’t suitable in the immediate instance at this time (not saying he won’t in the future). She has no self awareness at all. Can’t believe she was stupid enough to show that calendar
I was talking about her covert abuse in terms of what she says to the kids, overstepping boundaries. Asking about sex lives, telling the public her daughter has a pill to take etc. The F4J claims would actually be an 'overt' form of abuse and a crime under te sexual offences act I think.They did, didn't they? Not many people wanted to believe it because it would be to horrendous to think about, especially as J & B were still with her at the time!
I liked this one too....Hey Krusties
I’m been on a lunch break and not quite caught up. My random thoughts so far….
I seriously wouldn’t be surprised if she got a cease and desist notice from the Moonboot company for bringing their brand into disrepute. This is just like when Westcrack woke Burberry constantly.
The pics from last night are hilarious. Edna is a scruffy bitch. I wear better to put the bins out. Skank went from ABBA flares to gym knickers
@PTMe - thanks for sharing those singing videos. I have just had Alexa play a quick blast of Metallica to clear my brain and ears.On the first singing vid you can see Ednas leg and she’s scratching away like she’s got fleas.
I watched that Hunsnet video. If I took a shot every time she said THREE DECADES I would be deceased.
As expected, the DM comments from yesterday don’t disappoint. I am clearly childish as I have laughed so much at someone describing her lady parts as a “butchers bucket” that I have scared off my cat
Finally - ‘Drug misuse’ is clearly on the calendar. Either therapy or testing? She has fucked up showing that.
Totally messed up! I don't think she would physically abuse them ( is that overt?) at least I hope not!! But overstepping boundaries and treating them as adults with regards to sexual conversations and innuendos - most definitely!Yep, they were taken from her and not just a custody battle.
All her talk about being both mum and dad is sickening!
---
I was talking about her covert abuse in terms of what she says to the kids, overstepping boundaries. Asking about sex lives, telling the public her daughter has a pill to take etc. The F4J claims would actually be an 'overt' form of abuse and a crime under te sexual offences act I think.
It's all very messed up though!
Course she will its her mum!I see Princess has wished her happy birthday and said she loves her.
Maybe she’s distancing but still seems to have a relationship.
Covert , overt , either way she is a pervert !!!Yep, they were taken from her and not just a custody battle.
All her talk about being both mum and dad is sickening!
---
I was talking about her covert abuse in terms of what she says to the kids, overstepping boundaries. Asking about sex lives, telling the public her daughter has a pill to take etc. The F4J claims would actually be an 'overt' form of abuse and a crime under te sexual offences act I think.
It's all very messed up though!
You don't have to be gay to be a gay icon. Kylie, Madonna, Gaga, Cher and Diana Ross would beg to differhaving Katie Price on is the gayest thing that as ever happened to them like gay Christmas just how low can you fall why would you want to be a gay icon unless you were actually gay
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?