I know many posters have said that Skanky will probably be able to keep 50/50 custody of J and B. But why would that happen, when PA has had full custody of J and P for years. I’m not aware of it ever reverting to 50/50 like it was when they were younger. During the years with Kris/Carl/whoever, we have seen J and P go on the occasional holiday with her, or birthday meal, but never more than that. Obviously they’re old enough to decide for themselves now, but I’m talking about the last six or seven years.
We know that Skanky only had supervised, limited, contact with J and B for a long time. Then it seemed to become whole weekends, and soon after, she refused to give them back. I don’t see why she should now be awarded 50/50, when over the last 18 months of sole custody she has shown herself to be very far from a safe and responsible parent.
Yes, the system does always seem to favour the mother. But surely the whole history of Skanky‘s piss poor parenting should be taken into account. Including the fact that she already lost shared custody of J and P and never regained it.