That’s how I read also. I had to reread itSelling her old faeces?
Wait what? So he’s been charged after going off on what police?So it’s not against KP??
Is this really him?! Sorry if it’s been mentioned before
Good point, although how his brain figured that one out we’ll never knowDo you reckon the situation began on 23rd August (can't recall the time in the papers, but something like 11.30pm - so that is one day) then the thing that he is alleged to have done and been charged with happened after midnight (as some papers mentioned 1am or 1.30am?) so that would actually make it the 24th August
I commented this on his IG, I think he’s removed my comment as I can’t see it now though.I don’t know my own name at this point as my mind is blown with tonight’s dramatics, but what I now know is KP faked a bruise with makeup on her face and took it to the press, it’s completely disgusting how low she has gone and all those involved in their sordid media game. It’s quite sickening what she’s done
But price have said its same day have oYes! He looked so annoyed. So he's saying this charge is from a different day that they were fighting in the street? Loves dream
Please put this on his comments I don’t know how to do it lolMy tiny little brain is really struggling tonight....
"Katie was not hit"
Oooookkkk then....
I know its used in dvcases, as i work with dv victims. But hes been charged under section 4 which is excluded from legal aid. He could try a counter claim, but unless he has solid proof it eont come to much. He would have been better asking for the duty solicitor at time of arrest.
Wonder if she was on something and then when they got back together she suddenly had a different recollection and because of her not being sober or whatever at the time they didn't have strong enough case? It did seem to drag on, was he ever charged at the time?I’m under the impression that when a person is arrested for dv you can’t retract a statement because of how abuse works i may be wrong
What did he delete?Not for long now by the looks of it ... The bus is coming ... Only question bis which one throws the other under it first ... This is why Carol deleted his lovey dovey valentine's post ... Shit got real
You can for Domestic Abuse cases. He could counter the claim by suggesting she is guilty of it too.Unfortunately for him, he wont qualify for legal aid. Its very hard to get legal aid these days, and certain types of cases dont qualify
Me too. Totally agree.I'm just done watching Emmerdale and the Meena debarkles........ Pricey is the equivalent of the fkin Meena woman....nothing sticks....
I'm gonna Screammmmmmm.
Reminded me somewhat of this song, if only for the description of the grooms clothes:I'm imagining a Pom Bear masterpiece now, the two of them riding an old knackered dobbin to their wedding hog roast in the
MM cess pit pool
She used to sell used knickers and used implants on ebayShe doesn't like them, they restrict access to her phone
Has this pic been doctored? Ffs knew she was rough but wtf? Was this after the threads? No one should looking janice dicknson at 43
I think that tooi think they are going to throw the blame at the woman who went with her to the hospital, I can’t remember her name, think she was her ex-manager or something like that ? Is that who he’s throwing under the bus, not Skanky, are they going to say she made it all up ?
I bet clemmie and Jack are fuminMy tiny little brain is really struggling tonight....
"Katie was not hit"
Oooookkkk then....
yeah and???Section 4 of the public order act is "intentional harassment alarm or distress". It doesn't imply any physical violence.