It would make sense.I fink you are finking they were together earlier???
It would make sense.I fink you are finking they were together earlier???
But hasn't Johnny also been proven to be a coke addict (as well as other things) and aggressive, especially while under the influence? What's questionable is the extent to which he was aggressive based on her accusations. I think people are overlooking his aggressionVery interesting. Lol’d at the she took a stripper home part. So, she’s clearly a liar and a cheat, she’s clearly aggressive and has a coke habit and as we’ve speculated, she’s probably very charming one on one and a love bomber.
She’s trying so desperately to appear whiter than white and it’s backfiring spectacularly. I hope more people come forward about her
Is Vanessa a narcissist?! What?!!He was exploring how empaths attract narcissists. Vanessa said she loved him before she met him. Suggesting JD naturally attracts narc attention because of his empathy and need to keep the peace and everyone happy, other kids of narc parents will get that. It goes on to discuss how empaths can become dirty empaths which was a knew term on me, says when it gets too much the empath starts to react and can play a bit dirty as a tool of their own survival. I think I got that right.
Nope. All the testimonies (also by people summoned by the AH team) confirmed the same over and over -- he did drugs, he drank, and he was never violent to anyone.I'm sick of the discussion being
But hasn't Johnny also been proven to be a coke addict (as well as other things) and aggressive, especially while under the influence? What's questionable is the extent to which he was aggressive based on her accusations. I think people are overlooking his aggression
Everyone has 'narciness' sometimes is what the video is suggesting I fink.Is Vanessa a narcissist?! What?!!
Time stamp? I aint got half an hour to find itAbout that Keith Richards photo....
No, Vanessa is not! This guy just keeps speculating that everyone is (perhaps because he himself is). He does not have any special training/education, he just makes these videos (I guess it is income for him). Moreover, you cannot diagnose anyone with narcissism in the way he does.Is Vanessa a narcissist?! What?!!
Dolly and Wibble, whatever you both do as "real" jobs atm, you need to hand in your notices immediately. Your posts are amazing! (kudos to Dolly especially here re your Musk musings). You need to create some kind of international bullshit-busting organisation. I foresee a kind of global Cagney and Lacey esque super duo with maybe Gordon playing the loyal but hapless Harvey (no offence Gord). For the love of all things holy I beseech thee, make it happen!You lot were up early, its Sunday, no church or roll in the hay? Or did we have a morning line off the breakfast table? Yay mornings!
I fink you are finking they were together earlier???
2013 Below pic taken?? Note: Turdle was blonde as blonde for the Rum Diaries, hair is grown out dark in 2013 below, check out her met gala PR pix in the red dress, same.
View attachment 1284946
Nooooo, its the bruise kit on the floor surely, my pic just showed the wrong colour range as an example pic insert but look up close at the icecream pic and you can see its the bruise kit with the yellow and purple as @Idontevengohere says not the corrector kit with the green and I suspect the cardboard packaging or info leaflet making it look weird and the product being foreshortened in the photograph? The brown circle, I suggest is a take away coffee lid, nothing to do with make up kit. Gahhh, I need more tea. I had a mate make up artist who made up her own palettes for make up, who can be arsed with all that, ohhhhhhh, Turdle maybe
View attachment 1285070
View attachment 1285055
I’m not and never have disputed that he has anger issues and drug issues. In fact, I didn’t mention him or his behaviour once in that post. My point is that Amber is portraying herself as a whiter than white, charitable character, almost completely naive to drugs and the ways of the world. You’re getting sick of this discussion I guess, because so many people are now aware of the fact that she’s continually being outed as a liar, an abuser and a drug addict herself. No one is disputing the fact Johnny Depp is a more than slightly problematic characterI'm sick of the discussion being
But hasn't Johnny also been proven to be a coke addict (as well as other things) and aggressive, especially while under the influence? What's questionable is the extent to which he was aggressive based on her accusations. I think people are overlooking his aggression
@19.48.....Time stamp? I aint got half an hour to find it
How very kind you are! I would be delighted to be actually paid for what my training is but ex investigative journo's who believe in science and swore an oath to truth and ethics back in the dark ages aren't welcome in well paid orgs these decades. I should do better at pulling poker face tbf but my facial twitches give me away when hearing bullshit and arse lickin' corp managers have been trained in basic body language for interviews I'm of the era we could smoke at our newspaper desks and shag in the print room, don't, messy, ink!Dolly and Wibble, whatever you both do as "real" jobs atm, you need to hand in your notices immediately. Your posts are amazing! (kudos to Dolly especially here re your Musk musings). You need to create some kind of international bullshit-busting organisation. I foresee a kind of global Cagney and Lacey esque super duo with maybe Gordon playing the loyal but hapless Harvey (no offence Gord). For the love of all things holy I beseech thee, make it happen!
because she LIED too many people have been the victim of various kinds of abuse and nobody likes being played as a sucker she had so many people believe her at face value and support her I kinda saw the stuff of the restraining order and the daily mail defamation suit but didn’t pay much attention to it I liked the movies I had seen Johnny depp in but not really a fan hell I didn’t even know he was American lol my outrage is she used the media to do her dirty work and when called out on it lied instead of owning her own titMy takeaway from that Vogue article was that, in amongst Amber Heards obvious lying and cringe testimonies we see to have forgotten that Johnny Depp was ultimately, in a court in London, found to have indeed committed acts of domestic violence, and it’s not right that Amber is being vilified online in a way Johnny isnt and never has been. Even when he was sacked from most of his projects and everyone believed Amber in the early days, I don’t remember anyone directing anger or vitriol at Johnny. Everyone just looked at him as a troubled soul who was a bit violent. Why was there a lack of public outage at Johnny for those things in a way there isn’t for Amber?
Judge Mr Justice Nicol said the Sun had proven what was in the article to be "substantially true" and he found 12 of the 14 alleged incidents of domestic violence had occurred.
I don’t think for a moment Amber Heard is truthful. I think she was violent. But so was Depp. And the double standard that’s emerging (especially
nline) is pretty terrifying. it feels like villagers with pitchforks a little. Amber is a head but she’s ruined her life, her career and her colours are out in the open now. For the record, I believe Depp and my sympathies lie with him.
I know a lot of tattlers will roll their eyes and probably @ me, but I do think there is an element of misogyny and taking delight in the public downfall of a woman - but it’s acceptable because this woman is deemed to be morally bankrupt, a liar, manipulative and abusive. That’s why I don’t delight in watching Amber Heard being ripped apart online. I’m glad Depp is able to find recourse, I’m glad nuanced conversations are happening about domestic violence against men. And this case as a legal study is fascinating. But there is definitely an element of a witch trial in this too.
I’ll repeat myself; you can think Amber Heard is 100% an abuser and a liar and still recognise there’s a double standard/misogyny at play. The two aren’t mutually exclusive. people can be both abusers and also be victims.
The problem with this argument is that I think it is pretty clear that the UK trial judge wasn't getting the full story and was also believing stuff from AH that's now been proven false.My takeaway from that Vogue article was that, in amongst Amber Heards obvious lying and cringe testimonies we see to have forgotten that Johnny Depp was ultimately, in a court in London, found to have indeed committed acts of domestic violence, and it’s not right that Amber is being vilified online in a way Johnny isnt and never has been. Even when he was sacked from most of his projects and everyone believed Amber in the early days, I don’t remember anyone directing anger or vitriol at Johnny. Everyone just looked at him as a troubled soul who was a bit violent. Why was there a lack of public outage at Johnny for those things in a way there isn’t for Amber?
Judge Mr Justice Nicol said the Sun had proven what was in the article to be "substantially true" and he found 12 of the 14 alleged incidents of domestic violence had occurred.
I don’t think for a moment Amber Heard is truthful. I think she was violent. But so was Depp. And the double standard that’s emerging (especially
nline) is pretty terrifying. it feels like villagers with pitchforks a little. Amber is a head but she’s ruined her life, her career and her colours are out in the open now. For the record, I believe Depp and my sympathies lie with him.
I know a lot of tattlers will roll their eyes and probably @ me, but I do think there is an element of misogyny and taking delight in the public downfall of a woman - but it’s acceptable because this woman is deemed to be morally bankrupt, a liar, manipulative and abusive. That’s why I don’t delight in watching Amber Heard being ripped apart online. I’m glad Depp is able to find recourse, I’m glad nuanced conversations are happening about domestic violence against men. And this case as a legal study is fascinating. But there is definitely an element of a witch trial in this too.
I’ll repeat myself; you can think Amber Heard is 100% an abuser and a liar and still recognise there’s a double standard/misogyny at play. The two aren’t mutually exclusive. people can be both abusers and also be victims.
Nobody has been overlooking anything.I'm sick of the discussion being
But hasn't Johnny also been proven to be a coke addict (as well as other things) and aggressive, especially while under the influence? What's questionable is the extent to which he was aggressive based on her accusations. I think people are overlooking his aggression
It also doesn’t match the testimony of his body guard eitherNope. All the testimonies (also by people summoned by the AH team) confirmed the same over and over -- he did drugs, he drank, and he was never violent to anyone.
Only people who talk about abuse are Amber's friends and then it is "Amber said that" or "Amber told that".
Just 1 person, Amber's sister Whitney, has described violence on one occasion, the infamous staircase incident, however, her testimony is having contradictions, and it also contradicts Amber's testimony. Not to mention that is it nothing like the story that she told to her boss Jennifer when it just had happened + body language people/behavioural experts have brought to attention how she looks at the attorney for approval and how Elaine keeps nodding and mouthing the same words, giving a strong indication that there was lots of rehearsal prior to the testimony and the words were put in her mouth.
Also, their testimonies do not match the ones given in the London trial.
In fact a LOT about her reminds us of Gone Girl!Does her bottle story remind anyone else of Gone Girl or is that just me??
The answer is yes.... definitely.... 100%..... the English judge was correct.Can you honestly say that the UK trial judge made the right decision based on all the evidence presented in this trial?