Abusere: the cupboard kicking video....
Is it abuse?
Or delusion induced by cannabis psychosis?
My personal experience of Judges (in civil litigation) is that they make a decision & then make the evidence fit. If your client is a twat regardless of the evidence they will likely loose simply because the judge doesn’t like them. I would definitely put more trust in a jury than a judge to make a fair decision.Oh wow! Would love to know what you think about the UK trial. I still don't get how Whitney was allowed to watch the whole thing in court before she sat for her testimony.
I mostly watched with Emily too. And dropped into legalbytes because I liked how one of them had no knowledge of the case and didn't look at outside info.
I just come across this. This is from 2018 she's definitely still using here, flying high!
don't hold back.. tell us what you really feelThat makes me want to vomit! What a slimy, slithering, nasty, nauseating, loathsome, self-righteous, opportunistic parasite is misheard. And they say Depp damaged the me too movement? It was tarnished by her toxic, fraudulent preaching. She is truly vile.
On that note.....
Stephen Deuters was the one who texted AH after the plane incident. In the UK trial he had said he texted her that because Depp had said say whatever you need to placate her. He was on her witness list. Her lawyers chose not to call him. Her PA was also on that flight, not Kate James. Why wasn't she also called? She wasn't even on their witness list.Forgive me but I thought the WAPO only had servers in Virginia not where its published.. and with the anti slapp laws differing in that state versus say calif where they reside it was more favourable a place to trial this case, also hearsay laws seem to be different there, as I mentioned in an earlier post JD's pa at the time of the kicking on the plane incident has txts apologising for his behaviour saying he didn't remember doing that and was sorry, multiple others back and forth but it was a clear admission of abuse these were shown in UK trial but not allowed in VA citing hearsay.. regarding the op ed , I'm glad you mentioned it, she didn’t write the headline the WAPO did...the ACLU wrote the article with AH lots of lawyers looked over it before it went to press, the consensus being from unbiased lawyers that the case would have been thrown out in most states but not VA, the slamming of kitchen cabinets can be very intimidating believe me I know, and when you're told to get as much evidence as possible when building a case , I applaud her for videoing him, wish I had the wits and nerves of steel to do the same on occasion, as for when the ipad goes in the bin its pure conjecture to say she was sniggering I didn't see that I saw a nervous grimace...we also don't know he walked away as video stops,
I absolutely don't believe he is an abuser because he is a man what a ridiculous idea...
I believe he is an abuser because that is what he has shown...
Oh right so say anything to placate her....means" tell her I kicked her and I'm sorry, I know this isn't the 1st time it's happened but this is a part of the man you fell in love with " really ???? Even you must see that doesn't sound plausible???Stephen Deuters was the one who texted AH after the plane incident. In the UK trial he had said he texted her that because Depp had said say whatever you need to placate her. He was on her witness list. Her lawyers chose not to call him. Her PA was also on that flight, not Kate James. Why wasn't she also called? She wasn't even on their witness list.
I know you don't think it does sound plausible. I'm not going to argue that with you. What I'm saying is, her lawyers could have entered that into evidence but they chose not toOh right so say anything to placate her....means" tell her I kicked her and I'm sorry, I know this isn't the 1st time it's happened but this is a part of the man you fell in love with " really ???? Even you must see that doesn't sound plausible???
Yes, the Washington Post’s servers are in Virginia, hence that’s why it’s published there. We live in a digital age.Forgive me but I thought the WAPO only had servers in Virginia not where its published.. and with the anti slapp laws differing in that state versus say calif where they reside it was more favourable a place to trial this case, also hearsay laws seem to be different there, as I mentioned in an earlier post JD's pa at the time of the kicking on the plane incident has txts apologising for his behaviour saying he didn't remember doing that and was sorry, multiple others back and forth but it was a clear admission of abuse these were shown in UK trial but not allowed in VA citing hearsay.. regarding the op ed , I'm glad you mentioned it, she didn’t write the headline the WAPO did...the ACLU wrote the article with AH lots of lawyers looked over it before it went to press, the consensus being from unbiased lawyers that the case would have been thrown out in most states but not VA, the slamming of kitchen cabinets can be very intimidating believe me I know, and when you're told to get as much evidence as possible when building a case , I applaud her for videoing him, wish I had the wits and nerves of steel to do the same on occasion, as for when the ipad goes in the bin its pure conjecture to say she was sniggering I didn't see that I saw a nervous grimace...we also don't know he walked away as video stops,
I absolutely don't believe he is an abuser because he is a man what a ridiculous idea...
I believe he is an abuser because that is what he has shown...
Abuse of WHO? No one was in the room when he started doing that, so WHO was he abusing? Heard walked in halfway through to film him…do you realise that?Abuse
The text doesn’t say thatOh right so say anything to placate her....means" tell her I kicked her and I'm sorry, I know this isn't the 1st time it's happened but this is a part of the man you fell in love with " really ???? Even you must see that doesn't sound plausible???
That is really fucking outrageous.3 days after calling the police.... and the day after Amanda de Cadenet's party....
Why are Amber's lawyers using TMZ branded paper to send this letter?
probably because they leaked it to TMZ, that is a watermark that TMZ adds to everything that they post on their website and have on their show.3 days after calling the police.... and the day after Amanda de Cadenet's party....
Why are Amber's lawyers using TMZ branded paper to send this letter?
probably because they leaked it to TMZ, that is a watermark that TMZ adds to everything that they post on their website and have on their show.
Because Amber's counterclaim was based on Adam Waldman's statements.I'm a little confused about why Adam Waldman was on Amber's witness list and did Johnny and Adam have a fallout? From the charity video from yesterday (the one with legalbytes ) Josh came on and basically said it was Adam who wrote the case, who wrote the trial. So why was he on Amber's side? I'm a little confused about this.
Can't believe I missed all this yesterdayshushhh. I’ve asked not to be quoted numerous times. You all view a man who has confessed to head butting a woman as perfect so don’t talk to me
How disgusting.Even if this is just a mock up, it’s sick
View attachment 1338398
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?