- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
My boyfriend also says the same thing every time he sees her on the screen. I genuinely must be used to it, as I don't notice it that much!
I haven't watched any of her videos in weeks either. I think all the work she has done to her face makes her look cheap and cheapens the look of her brand in my opinion. There seems to be no diversity in the makeup world anymore, every one has giant fake lips , mircobladed brows and makeup in general is boring and uninspiring.
Which looked more fake than ever in her new vlog? Maybe it was the angle, lighting and closeness of the camera during her skincare but they looked like those joke teeth you get in party shops
until I saw the pick on the right I didn’t realise how much she’s done to her face.
Just watched a video of hers for the first time in about a year… what is that accent 
Same. I only watched because I wanted to know what she said about her 'tweakments' and couldn't believe how much her accent really his migrated to the affected Glasgow uni one. Couldn't listen.Just watched a video of hers for the first time in about a year… what is that accent
I’m probably late to the party but just seen this.
www.asa.org.uk
Jamie Genevieve’s representative said that they did not believe the post fell within the scope of the CAP Code, and therefore the remit of the ASA. They confirmed that Jamie Genevieve was paid a salary by VIEVE for her employment by them as a director. However, in their view the post was not an ad for the purposes of the Code, having been made by Jamie Genevieve on her personal Instagram account without remuneration and without editorial control by a third party.
Assessment
Upheld
The ASA first assessed whether or not the post was a marketing communication and if it fell within the remit of the CAP Code. We understood that Jamie Genevieve was a director of VIEVE, was remunerated as an employee of the business, and therefore had a commercial relationship with the brand. We therefore considered that Jamie Genevieve and the VIEVE brand were synonymous, and that posts made by Jamie Genevieve in her capacity as an employee of the brand constituted marketing communications in non-paid-for space, under the control of VIEVE.
Jamie Genevieve
www.asa.org.uk
Jamie Genevieve’s representative said that they did not believe the post fell within the scope of the CAP Code, and therefore the remit of the ASA. They confirmed that Jamie Genevieve was paid a salary by VIEVE for her employment by them as a director. However, in their view the post was not an ad for the purposes of the Code, having been made by Jamie Genevieve on her personal Instagram account without remuneration and without editorial control by a third party.
Assessment
Upheld
The ASA first assessed whether or not the post was a marketing communication and if it fell within the remit of the CAP Code. We understood that Jamie Genevieve was a director of VIEVE, was remunerated as an employee of the business, and therefore had a commercial relationship with the brand. We therefore considered that Jamie Genevieve and the VIEVE brand were synonymous, and that posts made by Jamie Genevieve in her capacity as an employee of the brand constituted marketing communications in non-paid-for space, under the control of VIEVE.
interesting. Must admit, I did wonder how and why she didn’t need to declare Vieve as an #AD she obviously has a vested interest.I’m probably late to the party but just seen this.
Jamie Genevieve
Jamie Genevieve’s representative said that they did not believe the post fell within the scope of the CAP Code, and therefore the remit of the ASA. They confirmed that Jamie Genevieve was paid a salary by VIEVE for her employment by them as a director. However, in their view the post was not an ad for the purposes of the Code, having been made by Jamie Genevieve on her personal Instagram account without remuneration and without editorial control by a third party.
Assessment
Upheld
The ASA first assessed whether or not the post was a marketing communication and if it fell within the remit of the CAP Code. We understood that Jamie Genevieve was a director of VIEVE, was remunerated as an employee of the business, and therefore had a commercial relationship with the brand. We therefore considered that Jamie Genevieve and the VIEVE brand were synonymous, and that posts made by Jamie Genevieve in her capacity as an employee of the brand constituted marketing communications in non-paid-for space, under the control of VIEVE.
That’s what I thought as well. I thin her representative saying that they did not believe the post fell within the scope of the CAP Code, and therefore the remit of the ASA. Is so bleeping ride. Just realised if arrogance.
Also mentioned in this Daily Mail article on influencers and being warned by ASA.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Charlotte Dawson and Chloe Ferry have posts BANNED by watchdog
An Instagram reel from Ex On The Beach star Charlotte, 29, seen in September, promoted her own tanning product line but it was not labelled as an ad.
they are always insulting our intelligence it’s what pisses me off more than their constant shilling
Jamie #5 Tweakments by Laura Millar. Still a massive shiller
Jesus Christ almighty
- Status