Jack Monroe #601 Replican't

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
"I, Daniel Blake" was triggering for her not because of what it depicted, but because someone other than her got loadsamoney to make a film about a pov. Thereby reducing the marketability of her own made-up tale of pov woe.

It's like her getting her grubby knickers in a knot when THAT MAN got that budget cookery gig, instead of her. She wasn't in the least bit qualified for that either, but her sense of entitlement overrides everything else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 61
The reading community I’m part of are all sharing their end of year stats. There are several who are well in excess of 100 books for 2024, but all of them admit that they pretty much do nothing but read. Quite a few are either retired or don’t work for other reasons and they keep TV and other distractions to a minimum. No 120 hour weeks, nine AA meetings a week or endless box sets and frequent trips to the cinema. Makes you wonder where smol pixies find time to read all those books…or could she be lying 🤔?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 49
She glomed onto Marcus Rashford's school meal stuff during the pandemic.

And didn't LJC say that Jack invented healthy start vouchers or something?

And she went to parliament and promised to submit loads of evidence after a hearing and I'm sure some fraus found no evidence of her contribution to the later paper.

Sorry, not really high quality enough for the wiki but I'm sure there's a page full that could be included!!
BIB - yep, she attended a session of the Work and Pensions Committee's hearing on the topic of the Cost of Living, and made several promises to submit evidence in writing. The committee received 51 pieces of written evidence in relation to that hearing, but none were from her.

In their final report, the only mention of her was to say that she'd attended. The other two people who were at the same session as her were mentioned in the report 22 times between them (Peter Smith of National Energy Action - mentioned 6 times, and Morgan Vine of Independent Age - mentioned 16 times).



In other words, her contribution was completely useless.

Source: https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/23272/documents/169744/default/
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 54
She was about 22, depending upon whether she was an autumn or a spring kitten - it was hard to tell because she was so tiny and fluffy when I agreed to take her and never really got that much bigger, just fluffier.

22 years of being treated like a princess, with only the occasional bath or grass seed removed from the depths of her fur to spoil her mood.


Her special treats and cat litter I'd ordered before Christmas were delivered today.
Do you have a local cat rescue that could cherish those treats for you? That's if you don't have other cats who could make good use of them in her honour xoxo
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 27
The one that annoys me is when people are telling you about a vegan recipe or meal they made and they feel the need to append vegan as an adjective in front of every single component. If you’ve established that it’s vegan already, you can then just say bread or sausage or cheese or whatever it is and we are intelligent enough to know you must mean a vegan version rather than having decided to randomly shove dairy cheese in your vegan dish.
But when we don't do this we get 20,000 comments saying 'but vegans don't eat butter/sausage/cheese'
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 29
But when we don't do this we get 20,000 comments saying 'but vegans don't eat butter/sausage/cheese'
None of the people who I’ve heard do it are telling 20,000 people to get that many comments!

I understand recommending a specific brand - eg applewood smoked vegan cheese because not all things are created equal, but often it seems like it’s just a way to get vegan in as much as possible. I know you’re vegan already, you’ve told me you were making a vegan version of whatever it is, I don’t need vegan in front of every single component.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 12
"I, Daniel Blake" was triggering for her not because of what it depicted, but because someone other than her got loadsamoney to make a film about a pov. Thereby reducing the marketability of her own made-up tale of pov woe.

It's like her getting her grubby knickers in a knot when THAT MAN got that budget cookery gig, instead of her. She wasn't in the least bit qualified for that either, but her sense of entitlement overrides everything else.
She's barely qualified to put her own bins out, the dipshit.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 48
"I, Daniel Blake" was triggering for her not because of what it depicted, but because someone other than her got loadsamoney to make a film about a pov. Thereby reducing the marketability of her own made-up tale of pov woe.

It's like her getting her grubby knickers in a knot when THAT MAN got that budget cookery gig, instead of her. She wasn't in the least bit qualified for that either, but her sense of entitlement overrides everything else.
The THAT MAN tit was truly mindblowing.
Imagine that happening in any other industry, TV or otherwise.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 41
She's barely qualified to put her own bins out, the dipshit.
Furthermore, she’s demonstrated her utter inability to be reliable or responsible enough to learn how to put bins out. And when she had a skip she put her meds in it by mistake. She shouldn’t be allowed near bins.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 39
Furthermore, she’s demonstrated her utter inability to be reliable or responsible enough to learn how to put bins out. And when she had a skip she put her meds in it by mistake. She shouldn’t be allowed near bins.
Let's face it, having been in close proximity to her, is it any wonder that poor skip was on medication?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 34
That’s what I mean though - she couldn’t have changed SB’s name without his consent if he was on the birth certificate.

Legally it wouldn’t have flown because he’d have had to consent straight up and if she’d changed it at school then all he’d have had to do is question it and then say he didn’t agree and they’d have gone with what was on the birth certificate - so she couldn’t have unilaterally changed it without him agreeing.

I worked in a primary school and the only exception to this ever would be if one parent and the child used eg Chris for Christopher and the child clearly wanted and asked staff to call them Chris even though the other parent said it must be Christopher, the staff would make sure anything that went home was Christopher but may well use Chris in verbal speech in the classroom. Any last name debate or an actual change of name beyond an obvious nickname and the birth certificate/passport was the default in a dispute situation.

So the two options are either SB’s dad was lying or he’s not on the birth certificate.
It would depend on the school.

From a legal standpoint a parent can informally change a child's name (including last name)without consent from the other parent, it would be upto the other parent to actively object although schools can refuse to agree without both parents consent, our schools tended to not bother

The most I saw was. three changes in two years; from original name to new partner's name, back again, then change to newer partner's name.

Jack has always acknowledged the baby daddy who has been involved since the beginning, so I can see no reason why she would refuse to have him on the birth certificate.

I realise I am a bit of a lone voice' but I don't think Jack is a bad a parent as she makes out. This possibly related to my previous job where tit parenting was a regular occurrence.
---
What in the fresh hell is this? And is the weird black-blue hole some kind of portal to the Slop Dimension?

View attachment 3341999
If you look very carefully you can see an image of a black cat wearing a bow tie hth.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 15
It would depend on the school.

From a legal standpoint a parent can informally change a child's name (including last name)without consent from the other parent, it would be upto the other parent to actively object although schools can refuse to agree without both parents consent, our schools tended to not bother

The most I saw was. three changes in two years; from original name to new partner's name, back again, then change to newer partner's name.

Jack has always acknowledged the baby daddy who has been involved since the beginning, so I can see no reason why she would refuse to have him on the birth certificate.

I realise I am a bit of a lone voice' but I don't think Jack is a bad a parent as she makes out. This possibly related to my previous job where tit parenting was a regular occurrence.
---

If you look very carefully you can see an image of a black cat wearing a bow tie hth.
The school I worked in wouldn’t tend to bother asking the second parent unless the split was known to be acrimonious, but if the second parent came in and said “I don’t agree with this” then it would default to the birth certificate - and I doubt many schools out there would do anything different.

If he could solve the problem by simply telling the school no, then IMO that doesn’t count as changing his child’s name without consent any more than a high school child saying “call me Chris not Christopher” to the school and writing that on their books has changed their name without their parents consent, she hasn’t changed it permanently and he just needs to tell the school he doesn’t consent as they’re not mind readers.

My personal theory is that he’s likely on the certificate and he’s in fact as much of a liar as her when it suits him to be to play poor victim dad.

I don’t think she’s the worst parent out there but I don’t think his dad is particularly decent either and I don’t buy it’s all just that he’s dim and overwhelmed by her better off family either.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 13
Thank you all for massive hand explanations, I had, to MY SHAME, forgotten that she was premature (confirmed, severe) and that of course means she has disproportionately huge hands. How silly of me.

Also thank(space)you for FSM explanations! I didn't realise there was quite so much involved in it. My children are entitled to them but I've never sold my lightbulbs or used a carabiner to drain pasta so am obviously not a real povvo.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 36
Do you have a local cat rescue that could cherish those treats for you? That's if you don't have other cats who could make good use of them in her honour xoxo

I do have another cat - well, weeble x baby walrus with longer whiskers. He's already become a bit of a behemoth from the constant supply of super high quality and tasty foods and treats, so I'll eke them out. Think I might need to get him some more things for enrichment as well, as he's never been on his own before.


The rest I'll give to a colleague next week who fosters kittens once I've set some boundaries with her along the lines of "Do NOT show me photos of little black kittens that are 5 weeks old, newly orphaned and just need somebody experienced with pathetic little scraps that is also a complete soft touch for all sob stories that come with whiskers and a tail".
 
  • Heart
  • Like
Reactions: 53
looking for the Asda pic
View attachment 3341625

also led me somehow to the index she did (sort of ) publish:

View attachment 3341715

I haven't seen it mithered about a lot but it's full of the same old "blitz it and turn it into a pesto" and "throw it in soups stews and curries" that we know and love.
View attachment 3341720

View attachment 3341721
"Turm In Voddy :)"

more like "Vom in Tummy". Or "curd in Vommy" maybe

View attachment 3341722
Pop it in a jar

View attachment 3341723
Follow his recipes but don't. Hokay then. "Fancy ingredients" what a gob end

"Yummy drink" I beg to differ. Celery is gross. Celery leaf water is full on hostile

Yeah bake cereal for 20 mins. #thrifty



View attachment 3341724

Ew
at least he has enough toast to leave some now, eh, eh, readers? Keep the donations rolling in

Pls do not put Weetabix in bread


View attachment 3341725

You don't have za'atar, are you sure

View attachment 3341754

View attachment 3341729

Oh well if there's recipes online already for something being a good reason not for you to provide one then why are you here at all

Of course: View attachment 3341731
This is not how you pickle cabbage, or anything in fact. Boiling it first, wtf? Leave food alone Jack, you don't know what to do with it and you never will.

1000020852.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Sick
Reactions: 38
Just catching up, need to vent my utter disgust over the Cooper situation.

Her six year old cat is in a worse condition than my partners almost 18 year old dog, which is at the end stage of kidney failure. The eye problems are a result of the kidney disease. (Partners dogs eyes are watery but no longer infected because my partner woke up, saw the dogs eye had gone gunky overnight and was at the vets the same morning like a responsible pet owner).

A prescription diet at this point is like chucking a deck chair off the Titanic and hoping it doesn't sink as fast. It will make no difference, nor will any other kind of intervention. They WOULD have helped if Jack had taken him to the vets when he first started showing symptoms. That is the stage that suffering can be managed, and the damage slowed down. An animal showing such advanced, extreme symptoms as Cooper is has lost over 75% of its kidney function. Kidney damage cannot be reversed. It will not improve, and symptoms that advanced wont change now, because the only way to improve them, would be for the kidneys to regain function, which is physically impossible.

Any time I talk about this kind of thing, people always want to say how they kept their pet comfortable with diet and other treatments and had another happy ten years, That will not be happening for Cooper, it's literally not physically possible for Cooper, he would be a world first and a marvel of the veterinary world because it is not possible to have such advanced symptoms and still be at a stage where ther is enough kidney function left that you can slow the damage and live a normal or comfortable life.

As for the insurance, I don't care if Jack chooses not to insure her pets. Insurance is designed for people who do not have access to large amounts of money in one lump sum. We all know Jack has money. My partner doesn't insure his dog, because he has enough income that paying your usual vets bills isn't an issue, he'd rather just pay the vets himself than have to deal with an insurance company. If something were excessively expensive that he couldn't pay from his personal bank account, he has multiple credit cards with over £20k each available he can access immediately, aswell as owning his £500k house and supercar outright, and having never been in debt, so in an absolute worst case scenario, he's got another safety net in terms of being able to raise substantial amounts of money/loans very quickly. Before he had those things he insured his pets. And yes, he has paid thousands to insurers on dogs of the past because the dog never got sick or needed expensive treatments. And he doesn't see it as wasted money.

Jack encouraging people to do this is another glaring example of Jacks wealth. I genuinely think that she thinks she is saving people on a monthly expense, because she doesn't understand what it's like to live without access to large amounts of money, because she's always had access to large amounts of money. THAT is why she doesn't need to insure her pets. She sees people paying insurance as an unnecessary monthly expense because she can't comprehend that that is literally the only way they will be able to access funding for expensive problems and treatments.

Sorry for the ramble. I'm just so bleeping annoyed and needed to get it out.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sad
Reactions: 49
Well, let’s hope she doesn’t follow through on this resolution from ten years ago for one thing
View attachment 3341606

While looking for her old resolutions (of which there are many, none fulfilled), courtesy of @MistyWindows ❤ here is some lesser-seen lurid technicolor slop (featu a bizarre Yorkshire Pudding trying to make a break for freedom). On second thoughts, ETA spoiler cos it gets worse on close reflection
also a horrifying Buffalo Bill green foam rubber Arctic Roll, placed hockey puck-like upon something lovely from the Cheese and Ham Counter.
View attachment 3341614
IT PLACES ITS HANDS UPON THE BOWLView attachment 3341613Grim.
🥹 what is it? Brussels, tenderstem, ? ? ? Gravy? Washing up sponge?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 16
I dont pet insurance as a waste of money. Pets are completely reliant on the humans that decide to look after them, therefore being able to look after them medically is very important. Jack would rather spend the 8 pound on blending food to unedible standards than look after that cat. She is evil.

I wish everyone a great new year except guest. I hope its a tit one pet.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 31
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.