Yes, I'm sure booksellers, teachers and librarians had no idea of the books' contents until she started rage tweeting. Thank god for Saint Jack.I find it sooooooooo odd that none of these people have reviewed the books they are printing or selling. I've actually written alittle sketch in my head of how this would play out but I am embarrassed to share it.
Tough one isn’t it?Yeah, because what schools are doing at the moment is so simple, the Heads are obviously sitting around doing nothing, so they're free to start rummaging around book corners in every classroom and the library to remove books and then contact JM using their school emails to say that they've done it.
I do agree with this but equally a cartoon character who appears to be white (though highly stylised!) is going to be perceived as white unless implied otherwise. The character looks white, and as far as the text goes there’s nothing to suggest she isn’t white (afaik?). When DW’s publishers claim she’s white, there’s no ‘gotcha’ pointAn illustration or not, ‘blackness’ is about so much more than perceived skin colour. She’s been told the character isn’t a black woman she needs to let that particular point go ffs
Bored already, or has someone had a word with her?
The new followers she gained yesterday.She’s losing followers again. https://giphy.com/vxdpsQNMFLT3RuMeYX
She just means goodbye right now. In this very moment. Just like she's only ever had one cat.Maybe we've all got it wrong, when she says she's going or good night on twitter she just means good bye from the phone she's using. She will then walk to the hall, plug that phone in to charge and select one of the other 4 phones on charge and start tweeting again a mere 10 minutes later.
I do agree with this but equally a cartoon character who appears to be white (though highly stylised!) is going to be perceived as white unless implied otherwise. The character looks white, and as far as the text goes there’s nothing to suggest she isn’t white (afaik?). When DW’s publishers claim she’s white, there’s no ‘gotcha’ point
Also this makes her claims all the more sinister in my opinion. @instacharlie posted many photos of the character, and surely even skimming through you’d notice that she isn’t black? She completely pulled the racism claim out of her arse
Oh Christ she hasn't just crossed Repealist has she? It's like Godzilla and the Smog Monster of rage, self absorption and wokeness in some kind of horrendous standoff!View attachment 175113Re DW in blackface.
I remember this guy used to be on tv quite a lot.Jack was banging on about being in the perfect position to bring a tv show for cooking with disabilities. I would have thought that the 'perfect' person would be someone actually registered disabled.
Perhaps a wheelchair user, someone who had been screen tested that was genuinely knowledgeable and engaging.
Not some entitle tw#t that thinks she should get everything going as she has managed to con virtue signalling and kind people to buy books full of questionable recipes
B-but Jack has an ouchy mouth!I remember this guy used to be on tv quite a lot.
he lost his arm and went on to win 2 Michelin stars!
Trouble is, if she admits her mistake then she reveals her own racism. She really did assume that someone with an "unpronounceable name" (her words), frizzy hair and nicknamed Archbishop Desmond Tutu was a black woman, with no further descriptors we are aware of. It is an embarrassing blunder, but backing down as soon as HarperCollins clarified it, she could've saved face. Nope, she wants to further cement her racism. Well, that woman I've been told is white looks suspiciously dark to me, I think she is a black woman. Look at her skin tone next to this other character. (None of this is word for word, but we all saw the tweets)An illustration or not, ‘blackness’ is about so much more than perceived skin colour. She’s been told the character isn’t a black woman she needs to let that particular point go ffs
I can just imagine Jack jumping up and down screaming I DON'T CARE WHAT THE AUTHOR SAYS! SHE'S BLACK!!! SHE HAS FRIZZY HAIR AND A FUNNY NAME!!! WHAT MORE EVIDENCE DO YOU NEED??
[/QUOT
But could he cook if he had skin to big for his hands?I remember this guy used to be on tv quite a lot.
he lost his arm and went on to win 2 Michelin stars!
She is so self important.
the more I think about it, Harper Collins made a super move there didn’t they? It’s driving her mad too!Trouble is, if she admits her mistake then she reveals her own racism. She really did assume that someone with an "unpronounceable name" (her words), frizzy hair and nicknamed Archbishop Desmond Tutu was a black woman, with no further descriptors we are aware of. It is an embarrassing blunder, but backing down as soon as HarperCollins clarified it, she could've saved face. Nope, she wants to further cement her racism. Well, that woman I've been told is white looks suspiciously dark to me, I think she is a black woman. Look at her skin tone next to this other character. (None of this is word for word, but we all saw the tweets)
As always, she's being offensive and insensitive. Jack, you don't get to label people, even characters in someone else's book. It's gross.
Nothing to do with JM but you mentioned him and I love this random fact.Mary Berry has hand problems due to childhood Polio.
And one of the Hairy Bikers (Dave Myers, I think) has very swollen finger joints and doesn't do many recipes that require hand strength, I think he has Gout? Plus, he was a carer to his parents, so probably has considerably more experience, knowledge and ability to do such a programme.
Really clever, and I agree she must be spitting feathers. They didn't even look in her direction, just responded to the Daily Mail request for comment and then went back to business. She started crowing about how she guesses they'll be responding to her tweets one at a time. Mate, they didn't respond to you at all. You are so insignificant.the more I think about it, Harper Collins made a super move there didn’t they? It’s driving her mad too!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?