Attention and virtual "you poor thing" back-pats.
Attention and virtual "you poor thing" back-pats.Yeah, that makes sense. And if it was happening to me, the first thing I'd do would be to avoid social media anyway.
I just... don't understand what she gets from it.
The 15% off Bureau?Nominating squig words for next thread title:
Which police squad do you think will be assigned to investigate Jack being signed up to a mailing list?
Daily mail
We try to adhere to the three visits before deeper questions because it’s not about deserving it’s about ensuring far better support than three boxes of food sticking plaster - if someone regularly can’t feed themselves or family there is a deeper problem to be resolved. Food is the last possible saving and if people are doing that they need more than food.My spouse works for a foodbank that supplies foodbanks. Most of their work is coordinating with grocery stores, food producers, etc. to divert soon-to-be-wasted food to foodbanks. The rules: the foodbanks cannot ask recipients any questions about their finances, their car, their job, their religion, their race, their gender, their family, their age, etc. The presumption is that getting people fed is a good thing. That people deserve healthy food. That people shouldn't have to feel like they have to prove their worthiness to get through life. The TT's assumption that everyone who uses their services is dishonest is fucked up.
I’d go with she’s making 99% up. You’re not too kind-hearted - you’re just astounded to think that someone could be that twisted. That realisation is why I’m here. I get comfort from the canal as I really do find it hard to process, even though I’m sure she’s a wrong’un. Now fuck off xIs there any chance what she's saying has been happening and we just don't know about it? I realize I'm probably being too kind-hearted but is she really making everything up? I just can't seem to admit it, it's so HUGE.
She knows someone she's ripped off was actually a victim of this guy, right?? Jesus
It just occurred to me that she might not have been interviewed under caution by the DWP, but it might actually have been HMRC instead. Always a minute grain of truth - and I mean minute - somewhere.She was interviewed under caution for benefit fraud even though she has 10k a month coming in and doesnt claim benefits. She doesnt know how grown up government depatments calculate whether its cost effective to pursue an investigation does she? Bless. Sweet summer child. Smol pixie doesnt know much does she?
As ever she’s been there and done itDaily mail
First person ever using a password manager and 2 factor authentication gets bank account hacked - for 24p
OMG is she the one impersonating Burnside now?‘You’re fucked sunshine’ - what is this, The Bill?
Forget the eye roll reaction, can we go straight to a FFS
Is there any chance what she's saying has been happening and we just don't know about it? I realize I'm probably being too kind-hearted but is she really making everything up? I just can't seem to admit it, it's so HUGE.
Or ‘no thank you, the police are investigating so I’d better leave it to them!’
WARNEDOMG is she the one impersonating Burnside now?
The CEO of Sainsbury's can get to fuck too, after the instant mash con. (Not only 2 bags in the box instead of 4, but only 80g each bag instead of 110g) There's a good one for the Vain Bobblehead Index, Monroe.
Or that she actually works with any charities....The biggest lie is obviously that charities (plural) she works with are being hassled.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?