Does one cause malice? Is that a legal term? Or a lovely bit of word mangling?
Jack Monroe #399 Catastrophically embarrassing
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Jack Monroe Threads
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
It’s snow joke.
I wonder if any squiggs paid on their credit card for patreon do they have any section 75 protection. I would ask Martin Lewis but he seems very quiet about patreon scams.
Yeah. I’ve been watching that exchange and account today too.
Can’t think who it reminds me of.
Maybe I'm cynical old cow but I wouldn't give money directly to anyone i hadn't met irl. I contribute to registered charities who are accountable with paper trials. This online passing round of the begging bowl for merely the performance of your espoused values is always a red flag to me as it's entirely subjective
I know this is going to sound weird, but I actually hope she is. She's been paid thousands and thousands of pounds by people and firms over the last ten years, she owes it to them to have been at least halfway sensible with the money and saved/invested for a house deposit, not spaffed it all on botox and J1g.
Actually, this might not be Jack but a random stan. I think I worked out who it was from the username and about 5 mins of googling. I won’t go too deep into it as it falls under doxing but she appears to be some oddball who has fallen for Jack’s balls.
You can't cause malice, you silly squig, that's the kind of misuse of words that we usually see from....oh....HANG ON A MINUTE
I'd be very keen to keep an eye out for houses bought by relations of Jack... Another for the portfolio of her dad's properties for example.
Purely hypothetical of course but let's say someone, let's call them Jon Roe, gets a load of cash into their personal PayPal. That then gets sent to another PayPal, let's say Ron Joe, then Ron buys a house in cash.
It wouldn't be very accountable I'd imagine by any third party like a Tax inspector etc.
Then Ron could let Jon live in the new property whilst Jon still claims poverty so she, I mean they, can continue the cosplay.
Hypothetically of course.
Purely hypothetical of course but let's say someone, let's call them Jon Roe, gets a load of cash into their personal PayPal. That then gets sent to another PayPal, let's say Ron Joe, then Ron buys a house in cash.
It wouldn't be very accountable I'd imagine by any third party like a Tax inspector etc.
Then Ron could let Jon live in the new property whilst Jon still claims poverty so she, I mean they, can continue the cosplay.
Hypothetically of course.
I was listening to a podcast yesterday with an author being interviewed who said she put make up, clothes and hair down as business expenses as she had to do appearances as part of her job. I’m guessing Jack does the same. Plus of course she will claim part of her rent, gas and leccy plus some/all of mobile and broadband as expenses.
I know I'm well behind, but that "I like to provoke people" tweet was a massive misstep. I know there won't be any legal proceedings from this, but if there were that basically say...she was *literally* asking for it - would that be victim blaming? I dunno but posting stuff you know will get a response, then complaining when you get that response is just daft.
Or maybe she thinks it shows her as some puppet master who is just manipulating the everything?
I dunno. Off to read Molly part 2 now.
Or maybe she thinks it shows her as some puppet master who is just manipulating the everything?
I dunno. Off to read Molly part 2 now.
That's illegal in the UK. You could only put down such items if they were only ever used for work purposes, I.e. proper stage costumes, specialist theatre make up, protective clothing for builders, etc.
The Irish adjacent may notice a trend in the names of the suspicious accounts as mentioned by JennyNumbers and others. Mmmhmmm.
Evidence the lodger is real and that the bungalow isn’t that tit!
Her council tax is enormous at £280 a month even if she’s paying over 10 months rather than12 as this on low income would it means she can only be in top bands available in Southend and isn’t claiming single occupancy discount. Which means her not allowed lodger must be on the council tax roll.
Her council tax is enormous at £280 a month even if she’s paying over 10 months rather than12 as this on low income would it means she can only be in top bands available in Southend and isn’t claiming single occupancy discount. Which means her not allowed lodger must be on the council tax roll.
Last edited:
Wondering if Big Dave has ordered her to stay silent during the funeral out of respect for her maj. (Retweeting Dead Cat doesn't count because she isn't actually gabbing)
Is it just me (or tit maths) that the £280 per month doesnt equal any of those amounts -
Either at:
£280 x 10
£280 x 12
or the above with 25% added to make up for the single person discount?
- Status