We’ve all been there hun don’t feel bad Celly D doesn’t half hit some high unsOh my dear lordo. I am coming from the past to howl with laughter over the song sang, as one clever ninny put, in Simish. What the LJC.
It reminds me of the time I recorded myself singing to Think Twice off the radio and thought I’d done a good job before I listened and binned the tape never to be seen again.
The difference was I was 11 years old.
Done!Can everyone get in and vote, only 10 mins to go!
BBC One - Saturday Kitchen
Weekend food show full of mouth-watering food, great chefs and celebrity guests.www.bbc.co.uk
It's me, i work remotely from Chiswick.They must be mocking the slopgibbon, surely?
If you are on a laptop it will be one of the tabs at the top. If you arevon phone you need to donto the three lines at the top, open it, go to media then 'search media'Sorry but where is the “media” section? There isn’t a section in the wiki called media.
This might be a link.. hopefully.Sorry but where is the “media” section? There isn’t a section in the wiki called media.
OT but a little frivolity at the end of the thread to save you from falling under the thrall of Big Church Suppers. You can put this on it (or on anything else)I like the look of that book and am very interested to know what you do to spaghetti to make it slap yo mama.
I might buy it.
Ooh, maybe she's in the pay of Big Church Suppers.
Joking aside, The idea is tempting , but could be genuinelyOff of the back of my previous post, if anyone has the time feel free to search “Jack Monroe Teemill” and click on that ad as much as possible. We could cost her so much money she actually understand what poverty is.
Oh dear, I may have just developed a new Jackailment called 'clicky finger'.you know what, it’s still up so wasn’t hard to get my own screengrab. If you type “Jack Monroe Teemill” this comes up and ad is clear on right hand side, it’s called a “PPC” (paid per click) search ad.
Left hand side sorry guys this is why I don’t drive.
The gclid is the click identifierI take it all the bobbins that starts =CjwKCA.... is the ID for the Google Adsense account? I just noticed as well as Teemill there's also an ad under the same ID for Good Food for Bad Days at World of Books. #FORENSIC
NO BREAD JUST A CIRCUS Standard Fit Unisex Grey Crew Neck Sweater
NO BREAD JUST A CIRCUS by Jack Monroe. Standard Fit Unisex Grey Crew Neck Sweater, 100% organic cotton, made in the UK.jackmonroe.teemill.com
Good Food for Bad Days By Jack Monroe | Used & New | 9781529028188 | World of Books
Buy Good Food for Bad Days: What to Make When You're Feeling Blue By Jack Monroe. New & used copies available with free delivery in the UK. ISBN: 9781529028188. ISBN-10: 1529028183www.wob.com
Don't worry it won't cost her like 50p every time you click on it, and there's no way you can spend more than the campaign budget (the ads just go offline at that point), but that does depend on the campaign manager's diligence (so more risk if say Jack herself was cocking about with Google ads).Joking aside, The idea is tempting , but could be genuinely
considered some sort of harassment or interference if we really did. It's been done to destroy smaller businesses and I'm not in favour.
Or say “that’s a Jamie Oliver trick isn’t it?” Again. That was the singular best thing he did on DKL. That was when his suffering was almost over and he had zero fucks left to give. Might watch that again laterDo a rinsed hoop joke Sir Matt, give the canal a sign.
I am feeling mischievous and would love to but I am currently actually poor until Tuesday and would rather not have to eat rinsed hoops for three days.There currently appears to be only one copy of Georgia Church Suppers available to buy on Amazon. uk
If anyone is feeling a teeny bit mischevous it might be worth buying it?
Jack isn't going to need it, as she's already got her copy
View attachment 1584694
Re Hopkins, the Win was because Hopkins accused JM of pissing on the Cenotaph or similar but it wasn't Jack that did it. (Kh refused to retract anyway) ie totally false allegation. The Damages were in respect of her wider family being army/royalist etc so a direct reputational effect.That is such an interesting point. I just had a quick google, and realised that the Hopkins libel was the year after the horrific Cameron incident. I'm amazed the court thought she had a reasonable reputation to besmirch after that, tbh. But it makes me wonder if perhaps the court doesn't put things together in this common sense way?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?