Or nom de plumjust reading the past thread and see you were discussing Jack’s dead name. I haven’t really considered that her past name is a dead name as such. Is more that the name Jack Monroe is her stage name, nom de plume (or nom de guerre).
Or nom de plumjust reading the past thread and see you were discussing Jack’s dead name. I haven’t really considered that her past name is a dead name as such. Is more that the name Jack Monroe is her stage name, nom de plume (or nom de guerre).
There is one of them going nuts at folk just now, the rest are blowing smoke up her arse about how great it is that the King is making folk redundant and she's so right to defend him.When she says things about meetings, etc she thinks that she can't be found out. The same way that going to AA can't be. They aren't the same at all.
She's depended on people being utterly gaslit or not being bothered. And anything that she says being defended. Where are her flying monkeys now ?
Yes, sorry, I deleted that because I didn't mean it as a reply to you. There was a previous post further up the thread but I clicked on yours while I was scrolling by accident.Oh I totally agree with that. I wasn't really speculating about whether Jack's trans identity is genuine. What I meant was - does Jack herself claim a trans identity? Bc it seems that she now uses female pronouns, presents as female, refers to being a woman, etc. I guess if you're nonbinary then you can use she/them or whatever, but she doesn't do that either. It comes across like she got bored with it and moved on. I don't mean this to be disrespectful to trans people. If someone tells me they're trans then I believe them. In this case it's Jack Monroe so I don't take anything she says at face value.
Oh god, I hope someone sends him that screenshot & the ONS statement.One last thing. I think it was the response to this tweet that made me do the FOI.![]()
Crikey. Do they just do the rounds ? Latching onto contentious issues for attention. Dimwits.There is one of them going nuts at folk just now, the rest are blowing smoke up her arse about how great it is that the King is making folk redundant and she's so right to defend him.
If she thinks well over 100 of us were utterly delighted at her clarifying “that’s not my fanny”, she’d be correct.I often wonder if she thinks all the likes and laugh reacts on her screenshots are for her. She’s such a narc I can imagine her seeing a screenshot with a lame joke of hers on here, and thinking the 100 laugh reacts are people laughing with her, not at her.
Yes @Valiofthedolls found a post on here about the Edinburgh talk where she mentioned the weekly ONS meetings.She definitely said she was having weekly meetings with the ONS at some point, didn’t she? Or was that Asda?
Yep. There actually is a really interesting documentary here for someone. The lack of knowledge and platforming of people who are proven liars/not specialists/not even knowledgeable about the basics is a particular bugbear of mine. So much ‘fake news’ around nowadays & few to no background checks. No wonder people are falling for grifters and charlatans when mainstream media is bloody platforming them.I wonder if the programmes that had her on spouting about 344% price increases with no questioning of whether it was true or not will ever be held up for examination.
It's like that spate of influencers a few years back who were buying stuff and pretending it was a brand collab presumably in the hope of attracting a real partnership, only more embarrassing as these were young wannabees whereas Jack is 10 years into a career.She hasn't been having weekly meetings in any way with Asda. I know this I told about my relative big cheese at Asda before but it's her job and I wouldn't press her or be able to tell much.
She's angling for a commission. They don't need her.
Is that the Book Festival talks? She did two and the site is still up offering access to them for pay what you like. It asks you to register to continue but then gives an option to continue without registering. Didn't a few people from here listen to it and give a commentary?Yes @Valiofthedolls found a post on here about the Edinburgh talk where she mentioned the weekly ONS meetings.
As mysterious as her weekly foodbank volunteering sessions.
This is 100% right based on my experience (alsoGovernment doesn't do 'off the record' in the way she thinks. Emails, calendar entries in senior people's diaries, meetings: if she thinks it's 'off the record' it isn't. FOI requests usually result in an instruction going to staffto search their inboxes/calendars etc for, in this case, 'Jack Monroe' - they're required to turn in any results and the FOI team will decide what is releasable. MAYBE she thinks WhatsApping a director or director general level contact (SCS2 and SCS3) is off the record but I believe many Departments do advise staff that WhatsApp messages from official devices are also fair game under FOI.
I don't see a high flying civil servant at the ONS or anywhere else in Whitehall hiding the fact she's been softly, gently speaking to them on numerous occasions over many months. Why would they. Ergo, it's bollocks!
Swap sky for Netflix, and this is thumberlina to a TeeYou know how Jack is back pleading poverty intermittently? This just popped up in a friend's FB feed......
View attachment 1580433
PhewAPILN is Alistair Coleman who is a BBC journalist I think. Not the same person.
It's the SCVO talk she did in Glasgow which seems to have vanished but I didn't watch all of the Edinburgh one so she might have repeated the weekly meeting thing?Is that the Book Festival talks? She did two and the site is still up offering access to them for pay what you like. It asks you to register to continue but then gives an option to continue without registering. Didn't a few people from here listen to it and give a commentary?