She doesn't have a style. She plays dressy up all the time. On Monday she's a lumberjack, Tuesday she's a 50's homemaker, Wednesday a butch leather dyke, Thursday Mary Poppins, Friday a Slone Ranger, Saturday a preteen boy, Sunday a mumsy 40 something. Then the week starts all over with another set of dress up clothes.
I think it's one of those temporary things you can hang over the door
It’s funny how she tried rallying the troops to fund the arts by subscribing to the Telegraph but it’s absolutely fine to rip off a designer...?! It makes my heart hurt thinking of how many low income people will be donating to her and she’s buying this stuff with it, the list is never ending and it just keeps getting worse.
Yeah, we talked about it on this thread https://tattle.life/threads/jack-monroe-144-the-man-from-strictly-he-say-no.14738/page-17, @colouredlines brought it to the Fraus' attention.
Buying fake/replica stuff is seriously dodgy. At the very least, the original designer misses out. At the worst end of it, you have people in literal slavery sewing Channel and Proda handbags, and drug cartels have been found to profit from designer fakes. The profits from fakes have also been shown to fund terrorist activity. This isn't be being some raging conspiracy loon. Its been well documented and reported on in the Guardian etc.
didn't she say that when she had a big new job, she treated herself to some Burberry / Viv / whatever? Maybe she bought this one when she secured the Del Monte / Linda collabs?
"Whatever
So true. There are many people who may have a style that's not to my personal taste, but because it's their actual style, I like it. It's them. With her, everything but the double denim seems like dress up.
Agreed completely it’s clearly that, and Patreon pays the fixed outgoings. She’s vile, weird vicars wife looking
The only thing I think you could get done for £250 would be a day of a handyman’s time (with a bit of change). Imagine the clawing, howling, and guttural wailing to the heavens when she finds out how much her dream kitchen is gonna be 
Louisa. I think whenever they row and Jack guilts her, the end result is her buying Jack a gift. I don’t think Jack is a connoisseur either so the gift is just whatever she’s see most recently and wanted (see impulsive - imagine getting a dyson hairdryer with hair her length, what a waste).
THREAD TITLE!
Oh I know it’s early but please can this be the next thread title
Yes i agree i think she is a chameleon and changes herself to fit in with whatever enviroment she finds herself in?
Never apologise for your posts! I always enjoy reading your insights. None of this would be so confusing if she’d just said, “oh thanks, I treated myself to it”, and left it at that.It’s funny how she tried rallying the troops to fund the arts by subscribing to the Telegraph but it’s absolutely fine to rip off a designer...?! It makes my heart hurt thinking of how many low income people will be donating to her and she’s buying this stuff with it, the list is never ending and it just keeps getting worse.
I don’t want to sound pompous but as someone who loves clothes I don’t get the gifting thing at all... She’s claimed to be such a connoisseur she’s holding key pieces as investment vehicles, obvs this is a lie but it’s a myth she still perpetuates, so who is buying her anything?? I’m v precious about this stuff (have a literal Apple Note target list, don’t want to buy new as it’s badly made, hate “it” bags or hype shoes, etc etc) so my husband knows to check with me first. I don’t know any woman who would happily have someone spend £300 on an item that they weren’t in active pursuit of?!
Sorry for the long comment and sorry to try and make sense of Jackie this far into it all
The double denim thing seems a bit dress up too. She makes such a song and dance about, as if wearing double denim is something really radical. I think she only does it because double denim is so divisive, and we all know how how Jack loves to divide opinion.
