Just imagine what the people she blocked on Twitter are saying about her on Twitter. She can search her name all day long but she won’t see those.
This wins everything!Havin a chat on Twitter DMs with @bootstrapadmin can’t share it all for privacy cos she’s on #furlough
And doesn't know what incremental means.oh no, she's furious again
Lolll, she means instrumental.And doesn't know what incremental means.
You changed your picture! I look forward to your opinion just so I can see kurtI worked with a colleague who couldn’t say cupboard , they said cubbert, we didn’t say anything .
For years ,and I still have to remind myself not to , I thought Balaclava was said baraclava. I only realised when watching Line of Duty and quietly, furtively googled it.
I have no idea where it started.
Yep. I've mentioned it before on much earlier threads but I've been involved in sustained Twitter pile ons. It's truly horrible and very damaging to one's mental health. People are vicious, particularly on Twitter. When they're hiding behind a keyboard it's even easier to ramp up the vitriol.This has always been a problem for her, and should be her eventual downfall if there's any justice in the world. It's what led her to constant BTL spats in her Guardian days. It's what made her write massive defensive essays every time a Mail writer criticised her in passing. It's one of the reasons she fucked up DKL so badly - she was on live TV searching for criticism on Twitter.
Everyone in the public eye gets criticised. Surely one of the first lessons is either develop a thick skin or step out of the spotlight?
It's amazing - she's even got to be the gatekeeper of screenshots for RM. Is there any way she *can't* try to insert herself in this?
I had to come straight onto here as soon as I saw this insta story. I wish I erase this combination of flavours from my mind. HOW THE FUCKING FUCK IS SHE A FUCKING FOOD WRITER.
Why has she photographed it after it has been eaten, digested and ejected?
And doesn't know what incremental means.
Not totally sure that The Times putting this story behind its paywall (which it does for virtually every story) quite amounts to The Times being "sneaky AF". Unless she's suggesting that The Times is an arm of the gov't?
Stop treating Roadside Mum like a child you mithering ninny. Also stop putting your ridiculous self at the centre of everything. Thank you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?