After shouting silently at many things today and grumping around in the house, this comment and gif has made my day.View attachment 307130
1st sentence: "Peel and roughly chop your garlic".
3rd sentence: "Peel the garlic and add them whole."
https://giphy.com/2H67VmB5UEBmU
Parmentier potatoes.
Greek mezze.
(Deep breath). I’m going out on a limb here - this title sounds like something I’d like. Haven’t read the recipe. But maybe, just maybe, I’d give this a go.
Her anecdote makes no bloody sense either. She's got confused in her eternal quest to play the victim. Did they shout at you or shout at the staff?The mind honestly boggles. All this talk of the Post Office, when only one squiggle has actually received anything they were supposed to receive from Jack so far. Her followers and customers are 100% likely to publically post upon receipt of an item. Is this all smoke and mirrors to make people feel like she's actually posting items?
“They did offer this to me but I turned them down. With Marcus and I working so closely on the FSM - well you all must have seen his tweet that was clearly directed to me and only me - I thought I better let some other mithering ninny have a moment in the spotlight.I presume the boy in the photo is a model. If he were genuinely poor he would be howling and clawing the floor as his mother looks on whilst rinsing a tin of spaghetti hoops at the sink in their shitty bungalow.
I'm sure Jack will be advising behind the scenes.
So the post office 'asked you not to' because you presumably had simply TOO much to post but now you..... don't? So either they never asked you not to or suddenly you have less to post.
I'm guessing your Patreons are waiting on quite a lot so......bollocks proven. Total A grade bollocks.
Fantastic. Mine is sent also, was unsure at first whether to actually name and shame but I think I agree there's no need, unless they respond and ask directly. Let's see what response if any we get.The message has been sent to Trussell Trust. I thought it best not to mention Jack by name. I pointed out that a person with close links to them is advocating a £20 shop for 2 adults and one child for a week. Gave them enough information for them to be sure of who I am referring to, but said that if they wanted me to be explicit I would do so.
I went into detail about my experiences of poverty and of my voluntary work with local charities. I also mentioned how this undermined the good work that they, and our, charities are doing to raise awareness. I asked them to use their Nationwide profile to publicly refute this and to investigate the dangerously low nutritional values of the meals that are being advocated.
I suggested they might not wish to name this person but that they could give out more general information that opposes and disputes this dangerous and misleading message. I also suggested they should distance themselves from someone advocating such alarming, unhealthy, and unsafe very low-calorie meals devoid of nutritional value.
I wrote a bit more, but that is the gist of it. I will let you know their response.
THAT. IS. NOT. A. RISOTTO.
Thankyou. Was just about to go and abuse my local post office staff, but after reading this tweet, I shant.
Shat herself after reading Tattle.She's changed her bio AGAIN so that it no longer includes the ~feeding 3 on £20 a week~ thing
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?