Brendan Howlin and Huw’s arse are quite alike tbf. ![Face with hand over mouth :face_with_hand_over_mouth: 🤭](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f92d.png)
When you order a Huw Edwards doll from Wish:
![Face with hand over mouth :face_with_hand_over_mouth: 🤭](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f92d.png)
When you order a Huw Edwards doll from Wish:
I think it’s inevitable right now. An immediate denial of all allegations would’ve said a lot I think. Even an insistence that he didn’t break lockdown. But he hasn’t issued a denial of anything.Thanks for your awesome analysis, @cee-bee. Whichever way this will pan out, it seems inevitable that Huw’s BBC days are over.
if I was a journo I’d be holding the pen on the claim that “to many”… an innocent mans Reputation has been damaged.“By now, though, Edwards is old news. Wily, ink-spotted scavengers have had their fill of his story’s carcass. Inevitably, as is their nature, they will return. Edwards’ inevitable reemergence into public life, the impending end to an internal investigation into his conduct, not to mention a potential TalkTV interview with the parents of the alleged victim (sure to be a worthy successor to David Frost’s tete-a-tete with Nixon), will see to that.
Given the Met Police’s admission that, on the evidence, no criminality had occurred, it is unsurprising that many are doubtful of The Sun’s insistence that their story, which brought deeply private details into the public arena, was of public interest and, thus, deserved to be published. To many, the tabloid had once again done irrevocable damage to an innocent man’s reputation through its careless reporting of vastly overblown indiscretions. However, The Sun did not act alone; the country’s entire media apparatus served as accomplices. As Victoria Newton, editor to the paper, pointed out, even the BBC itself participated.”
![]()
The Huw Edwards revelations unveiled the inadequacies of modern UK media - The Glasgow Guardian
In the midst of new revelations about prominent figures in the media, the Sun’s shocking disclosure is still muddying the waters of the spreading of media information If you were anywhere in the UK in July of this year, chances are that you’re aware of the much-publicised Huw Edwards scandal...glasgowguardian.co.uk
What the hell is this! It’s like a crappy MySpace profileOmg, seeing that article from 2005 made me google ‘huw edwards 2005’ and this came up. It’s delightfully awkward
View attachment 2518282
He is, it was mentioned in The Guardian at the time.So is HE still on full pay whilst he is undergoing treatment for his MH?
Some very eerie comments there, in hindsight.Oh, Huw… 🫣
Don’t quote me on this… but I recall BBC Management wanting to get rid of a lot of dead wood a few years or so ago. They got rid or tried to get rid of, a few big BBC names to make room for new talent. I have a vague memory of HEs airing his discontent and insisting he wouldn’t resign or be pushed to resign.It sounds like there are certainly a lot of (unresolved?) grievances that Huw had with BBC management. There's that "Fortunately, Fi and Jane" podcast which is basically one big bitchfest. I am surprised how uninhibited he was in that episode. Not what the general public would expect of him, I think. It sounds like the paycut is still a sore point.
But honestly, I'm so curious where he is at emotionally and psychologically right now. Is he heavily medicated and not in any state to think about his future? Is he scheming? Is he working on a career move? Is he planning any legal action?
Yep, I'm inclined to agree. To me it feels like Huw liked working for the BBC for the prestige but that he also felt he should be getting special treatment because he could be making more money at the competition.There seems to be a real entitlement emanating from Huw, upon reflection, about a few things.