As someone who had anorexia, I still don't class myself as fully 'recovered' even 4-5 years on because whilst I am weight restored and eat a lot more variety than Holly (not hard lol), I still get intrusive thoughts around food, body image and exercise...I'll believe 'final stage of recovery' when she puts on weight, stops looking like a bobblehead, stops exercising obsessively and eats something that isn't fruit or smoothies.
She posted the pic to body check because she's probably lost weight.
Yeah and the scary thing is that Holly genuinely believes that she is some kind of recovery vlogger who helps other people to recover from their EDs by talking about her own "recovery" online. I mean, she even gave a TED talk about how she overcame her ED! I think she either has very little self-awareness or else she just can't admit to herself that she is not, in fact, 100% recovered. Because that would mean admitting that she can't do it alone and needs help with it, and I think asking for help is a big no no in the Holly mindset. :/Thanks for picking up on the post, you all! As someone who has formerly dealt with a very mild ED (and still wouldn't dare to say they are completely recovered) and someone who has some professional training concerning EDs this just send me to another dimension. I'm so furious! I get it: EDs are tit, they mess with your mind in terrible, unimaginable ways and they screw family dynamics. So I don't blame her for not recovering or any family member for not 'curing her' (a narrative I often see on these threads I actually don't agree with; even for a 'functional' family, intervening in case of an ED can be hard or impossible, so I wouldn't expect this tit show of a family to manage). But how on earth can't somebody stop her from upholding this damaging online presence? It is so bleeping harmful!
Edit: Thinking about it I realized that in my 'Ed-days' (no belittling intended, just sounds so granny-like) the internet only really offered more or less 'hidden' spaces for this kind of harmful content (e.g., pro-ana forums, Tumblr...). Not to say that they weren't harmful, but I think that's why it baffles me so much that this content is so 'out in the open'. That wasn't the dynamic I experienced. For me, sharing my ED was a very reclusive, hidden experience, very isolating. For Holly it is so open and combined with open admiration and validation. How comes that we have no systems in place that can use this fact (i.e., the publicity) to approach and avoid this kind of content?
For me the image was concerning because of the caption and the body checking. I wouldn't judge her recovery status by her body per se. What's problematic is the content she puts out, her habits combined with the blatant lie that she is now totally recovered. And that this kind of pictures combined with her own judgement that the state of her body is in at the moment needs courage to show in a bikini considering the age of her audience. In short: she doesn't need to be a sceleton for this post to be problematic af.Sorry for intruding again, but in her recent picture, I don't see a person who is underweight. Her legs are full, arms are a bit skinny, stomach looks surprisingly wide. Her diet is for sure bs, but compared to old photos or Ruby Granger's state.. Holly looks a lot better.
Another thing I have to mention, is that everyone has a different body structure, I have friends, whose chest bones peek a bit too much, but they are healthy eating and not ed. Nobody can choose where to gain weight or lose.For me the image was concerning because of the caption and the body checking. I wouldn't judge her recovery status by her body per se.
Weight isn’t always a deciding factor for an earring disorder. Someone could be larger and still be anorexic/have an eating disorder. Someone could be smaller and have a good relationship with food.Sorry for intruding again, but in her recent picture, I don't see a person who is underweight. Her legs are full, arms are a bit skinny, stomach looks surprisingly wide. Her diet is for sure bs, but compared to old photos or Ruby Granger's state.. Holly looks a lot better.
You can say she “looks a lot better” sure but that is compared to Holly when she was literally eating a banana for breakfast, oats for lunch and raw veg for dinner (or not eating at all). Comparing her at this stage of her ‘recovery’ journey to when she was completely emaciated shows some improvement sure, but I don’t think we have ever truly seen Holly in a healthy place. Food relationship wise or mentally.Sorry for intruding again, but in her recent picture, I don't see a person who is underweight. Her legs are full, arms are a bit skinny, stomach looks surprisingly wide. Her diet is for sure bs, but compared to old photos or Ruby Granger's state.. Holly looks a lot better.
100% agree. And then it used to be oats 3 times a day! My personal opinion is that she is trying to eat various foods which is good but then she is realising she is eating more calories so she exercises a lot. So I don’t think her recovery is complete.You can say she “looks a lot better” sure but that is compared to Holly when she was literally eating a banana for breakfast, oats for lunch and raw veg for dinner (or not eating at all). Comparing her at this stage of her ‘recovery’ journey to when she was completely emaciated shows some improvement sure, but I don’t think we have ever truly seen Holly in a healthy place. Food relationship wise or mentally.
The oat thing is so confusing to me, she said she used to binge eat oats at night, but in recent videos, still shows making them at this time...100% agree. And then it used to be oats 3 times a day! My personal opinion is that she is trying to eat various foods which is good but then she is realising she is eating more calories so she exercises a lot. So I don’t think her recovery is complete.
I just saw the all nighter which consists of her shopping for a meal which she cooks eats and then spends several hours exercising to burn it off.. disgustingly toxic100% agree. And then it used to be oats 3 times a day! My personal opinion is that she is trying to eat various foods which is good but then she is realising she is eating more calories so she exercises a lot. So I don’t think her recovery is complete.
that's an ED rite of passage lol
ahhh so she did watch supersize vs superskinny
It's a condition named Brachydactyly , just googled, Ruby has the same. You are born with it.off-topic but holly has such randomly huge fingers, idk why I fixate on it
Guessing 5:42 was the blanking on stage Holly was referring to then! I genuinely feel for her there, I certainly wouldn't ever do public speaking like that so props for not having a complete meltdown.
ahhh so she did watch supersize vs superskinny
Yeah this - to me that whole talk just seems very stilted and unauthentic, both in terms of content and in terms of delivery. You can really tell she's just reciting an essay that she wrote and that essay is not even good. It sounds like something a teenager would write for a writing assignment, full of boring clichés and try-hard attempts at humorous phrases in place of genuine insights or emotion. There's also a few minor slip ups in the writing/delivery, like when she makes it sound like she had two cats named Emily and Matthew growing up xDGuessing 5:42 was the blanking on stage Holly was referring to then! I genuinely feel for her there, I certainly wouldn't ever do public speaking like that so props for not having a complete meltdown.
In terms of a TED talk it was pretty cliché and leaving the audience with the 'when there's no-one else you'll always have yourself' quote was uninspiring tbh. Definitely think Holly was over-rehearsed though her movements were very scripted and didn't seem natural at all.