I have been wearing the same five pairs of joggers on rotation most days for months now. Proper work clothes could prove a challenge when I have to start wearing them again .
I think you got the essence of the original suggestion! What would we do without you @Lunamoon22!Ok, so it looks like the new thread title will be @London123's suggestion:
Helen Anderson #13 Covid rules aren’t for me, need followers to pay for therapy, why work harder if I can already afford Prada
But unfortunately, it's too long to add (127 characters), so will need to be shortened (to 110 characters)
So far I've come up with:
Helen Anderson #13 Covid rules not for me, need YOU to pay for my therapy. Work harder? I already got my Prada
Click the following button:
if ok
if not (and add another shortened suggestion)
I know this thread isn't one to complain about titles, but just thought I'd pre-warn as it's quite a big change from the suggestion everyone voted for
I'm on a nightshift and really tired and manic, this has creeped me out.Yes! She totally does throw around the "everything I've done for you" line at him regularly just to get him to so stuff for her.
Example:
View attachment 399880
what do you do for a living if you don’t mind me asking?I'm on a nightshift and really tired and manic, this has creeped me out.
I work in a hospital switchboard, nights are pretty quiet hahawhat do you do for a living if you don’t mind me asking?
girl you got this!
Love it, but isn't this thread #12?Ok, so it looks like the new thread title will be @London123's suggestion:
Helen Anderson #13 Covid rules aren’t for me, need followers to pay for therapy, why work harder if I can already afford Prada
But unfortunately, it's too long to add (127 characters), so will need to be shortened (to 110 characters)
So far I've come up with:
Helen Anderson #13 Covid rules not for me, need YOU to pay for my therapy. Work harder? I already got my Prada
Click the following button:
if ok
if not (and add another shortened suggestion)
I know this thread isn't one to complain about titles, but just thought I'd pre-warn as it's quite a big change from the suggestion everyone voted for
Yes you're rightLove it, but isn't this thread #12?
a deep fat fryer to sit next to the air fryerHow many times do we think she's gone out since Friday? Wonder what this week's non-essential item will be?
Well, i for one am SHOCKED by this revelation. I think i need a lie down.If I remember correctly, she mentioned on a video when this magazine came out years ago she got to pick the front cover picture and she chose the picture of just herself rather than her and maff.
Looking on there facebook it does look like the cover is just a woman not a coupleWell, i for one am SHOCKED by this revelation. I think i need a lie down.
So glad you guys got away from these people. I had a friend who said similar things and behaved in a similar way, and can imagine it would be ten times worse if it was a gf/bf.Mine would too, thing is by the time she’s wrestled him into submission she could of gotten her own drinks three times over.
I was really shocked, it sounded very plausible. I wholeheartedly believe you.Looking on there facebook it does look like the cover is just a woman not a couple
I remember feeling really sad for Maff when I saw just her on the cover, and when she said that she was the one who decided to put herself on the cover and left out Maff, it was really clear that the wedding was purely about her and having her sPeCiAl DaY and not at all about Maff or the marriage. She couldn't share the spotlight of being on a magazine cover with her brand new husband - it's not like she had to be the only one on there, there's other issues of RocknRoll Bride with the bride's other half on the coverLooking on there facebook it does look like the cover is just a woman not a couple
Not always!Looking on there facebook it does look like the cover is just a woman not a couple
Great minds think alike ahahaI remember feeling really sad for Maff when I saw just her on the cover, and when she said that she was the one who decided to put herself on the cover and left out Maff, it was really clear that the wedding was purely about her and having her sPeCiAl DaY and not at all about Maff or the marriage. She couldn't share the spotlight of being on a magazine cover with her brand new husband - it's not like she had to be the only one on there, there's other issues of RocknRoll Bride with the bride's other half on the cover
Arr sorry i just had a quick look at the facebook which had 8 or so covers which were just Brides (i wasn't trying to defend her) in which case yes thats crappyI remember feeling really sad for Maff when I saw just her on the cover, and when she said that she was the one who decided to put herself on the cover and left out Maff, it was really clear that the wedding was purely about her and having her sPeCiAl DaY and not at all about Maff or the marriage. She couldn't share the spotlight of being on a magazine cover with her brand new husband - it's not like she had to be the only one on there, there's other issues of RocknRoll Bride with grooms on the cover
I’d understand if the magazine required a photo of just the bride, it is a bridal mag after all, but given the choice wouldn’t most people want their spouse on it as well? It’s such a sick keepsake to have.Not always!
View attachment 401869
View attachment 401870
View attachment 401871
She's just selfish imo and the wedding was all for show
Great minds think alike ahaha
Exactly my thought! How awesome would it have been to have a pic of BOTH of them on their wedding day in on a cover of a magazine?! I'd frame that tit up on the wall.I’d understand if the magazine required a photo of just the bride, it is a bridal mag after all, but given the choice wouldn’t most people want their spouse on it as well? It’s such a sick keepsake to have.