How?????
Ah…. that’s how…
Ah…. that’s how…
Or maybe there aren’t any kids to take to school? Flat pack truther here and always will be, until it’s proven otherwise!BIB Who would subject their young children to a 2 hour round trip to school every day? It would be different if they'd already been in school, and you'd had to move as they were nearing the end of their time there and you didn't want to move them. But to start them in a school so far away is mental. Why wouldn't you send them closer to home, or buy a house closer to the school you wanted to send them to? Or maybe it's a total lie and she doesn't want anyone to think they're at one of the more local schools in case they photograph them?
I think it is unlikely that Merchie (currently aged 7) will attend Eton at the same time as Prince George (currently aged 13). By time time Merchie is old enough to attend P. George will be in Cambridge/the airforce/gap year in Australia.Hello @LadyBee_Aus , hope you had a good kip! Just saw your new post.
Fwiw this is what I think.
I've been posting this on here for over 5 years now. The fraud is the Sussex children, illegally in our LoS and with Prince and Princess titles. HM set the ball rolling and Chuck ducked dealing with it, and now here we are with the Flatpacks eating shortbread at Highgrove with gandad.
Nobody knows when, where or if the Sussex children were born, and royal laws were bypassed completely. The Palace has a duty to guard the integrity of our LoS but they didn't. No proof of life, no birth certificates or doctors' signatures, just a joke circus of secrecy masquerading as medical privacy.
If the Stoats want their children to be in our LoS, let's see proof they're real. If not, stay private instead of wanting it both ways. Nobody would care about surrogacy, good for you, but not in the LoS. But they've got it both ways, and bizarrely Flatpack Ffarkk might go to Eton with cousin George! You couldn't make it up.
The Palace has had 7 years to answer the public's questions, but we've been stonewalled while the Sussexes mockingly post fake child photos year after year. No way did they pull this off without Palace access, help, baby photos with senior royals, and shutting down the press who 7 years on are still gagged.
The Sussex commercial failures don't matter at all now.
If anyone's seen the Flatpacks and has proof they're legitimate royals we'd love to hear it. Bower? Colin? Lauren?
You are forgetting that Merchie is a Child Prodigy and probably has already written his thesis for Oxford, and is just going to Eton to stop Prince George getting bullied and to help him with his homework.I think it is unlikely that Merchie (currently aged 7) will attend Eton at the same time as Prince George (currently aged 13). By time time Merchie is old enough to attend P. George will be in Cambridge/the airforce/gap year in Australia.
Can't see anything in the Mail or Telegraph.![]()
U.K. Court Rejects Prince Harry’s Final Appeal Over Police Security - London Daily
Duke of Sussex’s Legal Battle Ends as Judges Uphold Downgraded Protection Statuslondondaily.com
Is this true?
I suspect they think that Louis will go to the same school as George and that's where the overlap would be. It's possible all 3 will go to different schools as they seem to be very focused on what's best for each child.You are forgetting that Merchie is a Child Prodigy and probably has already written his thesis for Oxford, and is just going to Eton to stop Prince George getting bullied and to help him with his homework.
Spot on.This whole comment is built on an enormous amount of assumption. There’s a big difference between what William has actually said or done, what the media are reporting, and what people are imagining is happening behind the scenes.
William hasn’t said he’s “fuming” about Harry, he hasn’t said he’s “obsessing” about Harry, and there’s no evidence here that he was pushing for Harry’s banishment or prematurely thinking about becoming King. The media obsessively talking about Harry and William doesn’t mean William himself is obsessed with Harry. You can’t take the coverage and then use that coverage as proof of William’s supposed emotional state.
William has spoken publicly about what he would change when he becomes King, including talking about a more modernised monarchy and questioning some traditions. But that is not evidence that he was impatient for Charles to leave the throne. Charles himself had ideas about modernising the monarchy long before he became King. Having a vision for your future role is entirely different from wanting your predecessor gone.
The same applies to Charles. Charles continuing as King, continuing his treatment and choosing to have a relationship with Harry doesn’t mean he was “slapping the Waleses down” or deliberately putting William in his place. That is a storyline being constructed after the fact. Likewise, the suggestion that Charles is using Harry to keep William “on the back foot” is speculation unless there is actual evidence for it.
Even the idea that William was positioning himself to take the throne is being presented as fact when the evidence given is largely that there were articles portraying the Waleses as future King and Queen and discussing what a future monarchy might look like. William talking about what he would change one day is hardly evidence that he wanted Charles out of the way.
And this is the biggest problem with the whole argument: William’s supposed emotions and motives are being inferred from media coverage about him. If William hasn’t actually said or done these things, perhaps we should stop treating media narratives about him as if they are statements from William himself.
To be honest, you didn’t know who the late Queen Elizabeth was or what she stood for even after she’d been in the public eye for more than 80 years — and I’d argue you knew even less about her than you do about William. You don’t really know what kind of monarch someone will be until they’re actually in the role.
Oh course, how stupid of me to forget that! Merchie's first words were crocodile and Grandma Diana, allegedly.You are forgetting that Merchie is a Child Prodigy and probably has already written his thesis for Oxford, and is just going to Eton to stop Prince George getting bullied and to help him with his homework.
![]()
U.K. Court Rejects Prince Harry’s Final Appeal Over Police Security - London Daily
Duke of Sussex’s Legal Battle Ends as Judges Uphold Downgraded Protection Statuslondondaily.com
Is this true?
The oldest comment is 78 days ago so this would have been before his recent visit.Can't see anything in the Mail or Telegraph.
According to Neil Sean, who cites his source as Camilla's son, with whom he is friendly, during the brief encounter with Harry et al, King Charles had two photographs taken: one of himself and Camilla with Harry, and another of himself with Harry's two children.Or maybe there aren’t any kids to take to school? Flat pack truther here and always will be, until it’s proven otherwise!
You can now sing the 500th post anthem:Dear Terrific Tattlers!
This is my 500th post so it is an appreciation post for this wonderful forum!
We come from all walks of life and across the globe and I love being here and reading all of the posts: I love the content we share, the questions we pose, the answers we offer, the debates, the humour, the personal stories we share…. the humanity of it all.
A special thankyou to @Nuttynana for being the first person to welcome me here when I joined. Even more special now that I know more about you from your posts![]()
![]()
Sad thing is she had a history of it in her family and told the doctors she visited. They kept palming her off by saying it was other stuff for too long.@Plantagenet -- I was a big fan of Gilda Radner's, so hope you don't mind my noting that's a photo of her character Emily Litella.
This was her character Roseanne Roseannadanna.....
View attachment 4092076
Gilda Radner was so talented. We lost her way too soon. duck cancer.
You can now sing the 500th post anthem:
Woah, Oh,
I'm halfway there!
Woah, Oh,
The Lizard and the Spare!
You're welcome![]()
According to Neil Sean, who cites his source as Camilla's son, with whom he is friendly, during the brief encounter with Harry et al, King Charles had two photographs taken: one of himself and Camilla with Harry, and another of himself with Harry's two children.
The King also brought up Harry and Meghan's fractured relationship with Thomas Markle.
Thank youThe oldest comment is 78 days ago so this would have been before his recent visit.