Harry & Meghan #594 Mutton dressed as lizard

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Thanks for the new thread and title.

The Sussexes have been "vindicated" by their secret meeting with Chuck, as this was apparently arranged unbeknown to C&W so the Stoats have "bypassed" the Waleses. Having spent private time with his father, the Stoat feels confident enough now to "turn his back on William".
However short or long the meeting and whether it happened at all doesn't matter. Chuck from BP announced he met the family, and that has opened the door.
If Harry's coming back regularly as he says, he'll need a house. RL? Security? He's already a CoS and he won't need to do royal work, just his charities, HIHO.
Keeping aside this recent meeting and what it entailed: Turning his back on the future King just does not make sense! Is Harry that short sighted?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 31
Pro-Sussex Harper's Bazaar

"Prince Harry Reportedly Fears William Could Strip Archie and Lilibet of Their Royal Titles"
A royal reporter explains why
By Harper's Bazaar Staff
Published: Mar 26, 2026 3:01 PM

"The rift between Prince Harry and brother Prince William has yet to be mended, and now, Harry reportedly fears it could impact his children."

"In his new book, Betrayal: Power, Deceit And The Fight For The Future Of The Royal Family, royal reporter Tom Bower claims that Harry worries that when his brother becomes king, he could choose to remove Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet’s “HRH” titles, as Harry and Duchess Meghan are no longer working royals."

"Per the author, Harry is afraid that William will show “no mercy” toward his family when he has all the power."

"The Duke of Sussex’s alleged concern comes after King Charles III stripped brother Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor of his royal titles and honors due to his ties to the late convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein....Bower claims that the historic move made Harry realize that his own royal status is “no longer invincible,” and therefore his kids’ titles could be at risk."

"In 2022, after Princess Lilibet was born, Charles and Harry agreed that both of Harry’s kids, Archie, 6, and Lili, 4, would use “prince” and “princess” titles. But as we know, a reigning monarch can strip other royals of their titles if he or she decides to."
.............................

They're all on board supporting the fraud, led from the top by the King. All of them, even supposedly fearless biographers like Bower who's never been sued and Colin Campbell who's never been sued. I can now see why they have never been sued, any of them.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 31
Pro-Sussex Harper's Bazaar

"Prince Harry Reportedly Fears William Could Strip Archie and Lilibet of Their Royal Titles"
A royal reporter explains why
By Harper's Bazaar Staff
Published: Mar 26, 2026 3:01 PM

"The rift between Prince Harry and brother Prince William has yet to be mended, and now, Harry reportedly fears it could impact his children."

"In his new book, Betrayal: Power, Deceit And The Fight For The Future Of The Royal Family, royal reporter Tom Bower claims that Harry worries that when his brother becomes king, he could choose to remove Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet’s “HRH” titles, as Harry and Duchess Meghan are no longer working royals."

"Per the author, Harry is afraid that William will show “no mercy” toward his family when he has all the power."

"The Duke of Sussex’s alleged concern comes after King Charles III stripped brother Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor of his royal titles and honors due to his ties to the late convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein....Bower claims that the historic move made Harry realize that his own royal status is “no longer invincible,” and therefore his kids’ titles could be at risk."

"In 2022, after Princess Lilibet was born, Charles and Harry agreed that both of Harry’s kids, Archie, 6, and Lili, 4, would use “prince” and “princess” titles. But as we know, a reigning monarch can strip other royals of their titles if he or she decides to."
.............................

They're all on board supporting the fraud, led from the top by the King. All of them, even supposedly fearless biographers like Bower who's never been sued and Colin Campbell who's never been sued. I can now see why they have never been sued, any of them.
What is the fraud that is led by Charles? I just want to be clear about what you are referring to!

edit: it’s after midnight for me and I’ve been chasing around after a toddler today so I’m knackered and off to bed now and won’t see your reply (if you reply!) straight away.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 22
With due recognition to a commenter on the DM comments section, I've edited with a few tweaks:

Harry and Meghan #595 As Ever, whatever, she's not clever, just a grifter forever
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 37
Keeping aside this recent meeting and what it entailed: Turning his back on the future King just does not make sense! Is Harry that short sighted?
On the face of it, it doesn't, but there's a lot going on behind the scenes that the press know but is hidden from the public imo.
A minority view of one, but the Stoats have been in a strong position since 2018 though it's not seemed like it. For me, we can only look at the results not what we'd prefer. Look at what the Stoats have achieved, but still nobody asks how and why.

William will have no more wiggle room than Chuck if he makes it to the throne, and if he was monarch he'd be in the same fix as his pa. When you dine with the devil you need a long spoon!
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 22
On the face of it, it doesn't, but there's a lot going on behind the scenes that the press know but is hidden from the public imo.
A minority view of one, but the Stoats have been in a strong position since 2018 though it's not seemed like it. For me, we can only look at the results not what we'd prefer. Look at what the Stoats have achieved, but still nobody asks how and why.

William will have no more wiggle room than Chuck if he makes it to the throne, and if he was monarch he'd be in the same fix as his pa. When you dine with the devil you need a long spoon!
[still awake for now!]
“Look at what the Stoats have achieved,…”
What have the Stoats achieved? I only see failures.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 42
What is the fraud that is led by Charles? I just want to be clear about what you are referring to!

edit: it’s after midnight for me and I’ve been chasing around after a toddler today so I’m knackered and off to bed now and won’t see your reply (if you reply!) straight away.
Hello @LadyBee_Aus , hope you had a good kip! Just saw your new post.
Fwiw this is what I think.

I've been posting this on here for over 5 years now. The fraud is the Sussex children, illegally in our LoS and with Prince and Princess titles. HM set the ball rolling and Chuck ducked dealing with it, and now here we are with the Flatpacks eating shortbread at Highgrove with gandad.

Nobody knows when, where or if the Sussex children were born, and royal laws were bypassed completely. The Palace has a duty to guard the integrity of our LoS but they didn't. No proof of life, no birth certificates or doctors' signatures, just a joke circus of secrecy masquerading as medical privacy.

If the Stoats want their children to be in our LoS, let's see proof they're real. If not, stay private instead of wanting it both ways. Nobody would care about surrogacy, good for you, but not in the LoS. But they've got it both ways, and bizarrely Flatpack Ffarkk might go to Eton with cousin George! You couldn't make it up.

The Palace has had 7 years to answer the public's questions, but we've been stonewalled while the Sussexes mockingly post fake child photos year after year. No way did they pull this off without Palace access, help, baby photos with senior royals, and shutting down the press who 7 years on are still gagged.
The Sussex commercial failures don't matter at all now.

If anyone's seen the Flatpacks and has proof they're legitimate royals we'd love to hear it. Bower? Colin? Lauren?
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 41
[still awake for now!]
“Look at what the Stoats have achieved,…”
What have the Stoats achieved? I only see failures.
It's not a Sussex failure to get Chuck to announce from BP that he's eating shortbread biscuits with a couple of cardboard boxes as guests, pretending he's their gandad!! 😅
 
  • Like
Reactions: 22
I think we're going to get a "soft launch" with Harry over the coming year towards the Invictus games.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Sick
Reactions: 39
Thanks for the new thread and title.

The Sussexes have been "vindicated" by their secret meeting with Chuck, as this was apparently arranged unbeknown to C&W so the Stoats have "bypassed" the Waleses. Having spent private time with his father, the Stoat feels confident enough now to "turn his back on William".
However short or long the meeting and whether it happened at all doesn't matter. Chuck from BP announced he met the family, and that has opened the door.
If Harry's coming back regularly as he says, he'll need a house. RL? Security? He's already a CoS and he won't need to do royal work, just his charities, HIHO.
He’ll be given a lower ground floor in BP next to the boiler room to use any time he visits.

I doubt his security will alter either, another CoS ….. Edward only gets security when doing royal work so even if Hazno had a house here but not doing royal work then he wouldn’t get full time security - only what he pays for himself.
His charities are not royal work so they don’t count. Didn’t he moan recently because he was not happy he didn’t get it when doing the Invictus stuff?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 35
I can see him getting given a permanent home somewhere.

Lets face it, If AMW can end up with a farmhouse the bar is very low for H to be accommodated eventually.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 33
I can see him getting given a permanent home somewhere.

Lets face it, If AMW can end up with a farmhouse the bar is very low for H to be accommodated eventually.
You are probably right but, like AMW, he will moan that it is not good enough for a man of his status and the ILBW will want the innards stripped out and replaced with a SoHo house type interior at the cost of a few million.

Oh and will Harry need a low bar because when he’s had a few drinks he can’t reach a high bar?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 25
She posted more crap last night:

Bright citrus with just the right amount of sweetness. Our Orange Marmalade is one she reaches for all summer long 🍊

Bright citrus with just the right amount of sweetness. Our Orange Marmalade is one she reaches f.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 33
Pro-Sussex Harper's Bazaar

"Prince Harry Reportedly Fears William Could Strip Archie and Lilibet of Their Royal Titles"
A royal reporter explains why
By Harper's Bazaar Staff
Published: Mar 26, 2026 3:01 PM

"The rift between Prince Harry and brother Prince William has yet to be mended, and now, Harry reportedly fears it could impact his children."

"In his new book, Betrayal: Power, Deceit And The Fight For The Future Of The Royal Family, royal reporter Tom Bower claims that Harry worries that when his brother becomes king, he could choose to remove Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet’s “HRH” titles, as Harry and Duchess Meghan are no longer working royals."

"Per the author, Harry is afraid that William will show “no mercy” toward his family when he has all the power."

"The Duke of Sussex’s alleged concern comes after King Charles III stripped brother Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor of his royal titles and honors due to his ties to the late convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein....Bower claims that the historic move made Harry realize that his own royal status is “no longer invincible,” and therefore his kids’ titles could be at risk."

"In 2022, after Princess Lilibet was born, Charles and Harry agreed that both of Harry’s kids, Archie, 6, and Lili, 4, would use “prince” and “princess” titles. But as we know, a reigning monarch can strip other royals of their titles if he or she decides to."
.............................

They're all on board supporting the fraud, led from the top by the King. All of them, even supposedly fearless biographers like Bower who's never been sued and Colin Campbell who's never been sued. I can now see why they have never been sued, any of them.

It's all about Harry's ego - he really is the new AMW and determined to cling on to every status symbol for his kids

The late Queen's grandchildren - Peter, Zara, Louise and James have managed perfectly well without being Princes/Princesses so why would 2 great grandchildren who won't even grow up in the UK need them apart from merching.

They could use Harrys title and become Lord Archie/Lady Lilibet of Sussex

Or they could follow the Edinburghs and adopt Harry's subsidiary titles - Lord Archie of Dumbarton/Kilkeel
 
  • Like
Reactions: 43
Thanks for the new thread and title. :)



How ridiculous. William is doing the best he can with the resources he has available. What will Palmer blame William for next? Earthshot isn't preventing global warming?

Richard Fitzwilliam is moaning about him in the DM too. Doesn't have the 'right' sort of workload and may do away with some traditions. The poll indicates William is actually on the right track.



View attachment 4091349

It's definitely another anti-William summer. Whether it's BP-instigated or not, it's a pity BP can't support the heirs a bit more rather than letting the Harkles try and spin narratives about W&C and now George.

The RRs are probably upset that no rumours have circulated about the Waleses enjoying a lavish, luxury holiday abroad that they can pick apart. I remember last year that the DM managed to construct an entire article about George sending a tender ashore to pick up McDonalds, with absolutely no concrete proof the Waleses were even on a yacht at all. Camilla was subsequently photographed on one, but apparently she deserved a nice holiday. :rolleyes:
this survery annoys me hugely, it has been so contrived so the results will say, it can be spun in Harrys favour and especailly with the bit about the monarchy needs to modernise. These questions have been very very carefully selected. All these responses where hitting on William could be used to promote Harry imho
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 32
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.