Markle sycophant, fraud co-conspirator, lip-smacking Misan Harriman at the London vigil today. 
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I doubt very much that Harry's visa restricts how often he can come and go between here and the US, or ever has. His recent announcement that he "intends to visit the UK more often next year" is imo a sign of his increased freedom to do what he wants in England. It seems he's immune from prosecution or investigation, and has the same visa that was arranged for him after Sandringham - possibly the best type that no way reflects his idiotic criminality. He's always been covered for and that won't change.
Posting these singularly as they got muddled up when posing a a whole
I dont think the costs will be a media circus, it will be low-key and will quietly go away and the wagon will roll on. They're not going to highlight the dismal failure of this non-starter imo.
Last edited:
What has this got to do with a judge or a court? It's the HO and Ravec, surely? This never went to court.
U.K. Court Rejects Prince Harry’s Final Appeal Over Police Security - London Daily
Duke of Sussex’s Legal Battle Ends as Judges Uphold Downgraded Protection Statuslondondaily.com
Is this true?
Last edited:
I think this is rubbish, dear Neil
Infuriating but not surprising. There do seem to be different rules applied but I've no idea why. I've never had a search button, nor do I seem to have access to the "help forum" which is regularly mentioned. I'm just hoping it all changes at 500 posts, or I'm going to have a very long wait to watch megsy's videos.
Have just started watching this - ILBW forcing herself into people's personal space. The little girl (second clip) looks really "ugh" about being touched.
London Daily's just trying to stay relevant (cough, cough).
When many outlets have no updated news to share but need clicks, they just dust off old articles & re-post them.
So, nothing to see here. Move along, kind Tattlers.
The photos to be in the background when we see the Christmas Day message from the King?
Eta...am way behind and others have already said this!
Last edited:
Except KC3 has never shown family photos in the background during his Christmas Day messages. He has claimed that he wants the focus upon the message itself, and not on distractions (looking at you, Snarkles).
Last edited:
If the photos are shown in the King's Christmas day message,
will milk the outrage of not respecting the flatpacks' privacy for all it's worth.If the photos are not shown in the King's Christmas day message,
will milk the outrage of not acknowledging the flatpacks for all it's worth.I predict Charles will film his message somewhere there is no place for private family photos.
You need to cut down on popcorn, Mice, and realise that when Colin or The Times promise a "big reveal" it always evaporates in advance.This is why I'm so large!
You're left with popcorn that you feel obliged to eat, and this has been going on on this thread for years like with the Bullying Report. Many of us on here are large, and it's the fault of the Press especially Rebecca English, Tobyn Andreae and Ravec. (Sedentary Rhodents on here who avoid "The Wheel" are particularly vulnerable.)
Some of us are actually Fattlers as well as Tattlers, though luckily I've remained svelte because of my cynicism and love of conspiracy theories!
To be fair to the boy, all teenage boys have hair like that right now - I call it 'the llama', although I don't believe that's exactly what my teen son asks for when he goes to the barber.
- Status