Please remember that The Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday are owned by two different newspaper groups; ANL & DMGT respetively.
Hazza just couldn't stand the Mail saying the Invictus donation came from them, could he? Its hilarious how thin-skinned he is...
He's not actually doing anything meaningful for the military. Sorry but donating a few packed lunches and a zoom chat or three doesn't add up to much.
On the birth certificate, one of Megzy's DM comment accounts posted this morning
Odd-toed Ungulate is sounding a lot like stroppy Omoid this morning.... Oh and 'George Zadie' is their offensive way of referring to Lady C. Very personal attack.
Please remember that The Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday are owned by two different newspaper groups; ANL & DMGT respetively.No pragmatic management of the press like Diana did and William and Catherine do. The press had to be subservient and worship them ... Or else .....It doesn't work like that in a democracy. If they want servile press coverage go somewhere like North Korea.. They would do well there as Hazzno could award himself honours: Supreme Leader, Great Marshal, Eternal Warrior, Superior Person, Guiding Sun Ray, Ever Victorious Iron-Willed Commander (yes really) etc etc...
That you minge under cover ?? yoo-hoo sugar !!
The only fungulate here is you sweetheart wiv your hooves.
Old Toad Buniongate says you're a hologram! Wish you were! Bugger off.
35 grandOfficially dead
FantasticI'm new to commenting but not new to the site.
I have one small first-hand tale to tell regarding the formerly known as Prince, I think some may find it amusing - I still laugh now. (I do have another regarding the shambolic wedding, but for another day)
At a Millies award night (Sun newspaper thing) approx 6 years ago (Dec 2014), around the table in HRH's presence was a group of military personnel, all there for recognition for an act that is out of scope for their normal military duties. One of the attendees excused themselves from the table and on return very excitly exclaimed that they had just met David Beckham and was so delighted that had been allowed a selfie with him (DB), this was all said just as they sat back next to HRH - HRH laughed at being less popular than DB himself!
I will say, DB was charming and articulate - clearly the lessons had paid off.
Well done on your first post - let it not be your lastI'm new to commenting but not new to the site.
I have one small first-hand tale to tell regarding the formerly known as Prince, I think some may find it amusing - I still laugh now. (I do have another regarding the shambolic wedding, but for another day)
At a Millies award night (Sun newspaper thing) approx 6 years ago (Dec 2014), around the table in HRH's presence was a group of military personnel, all there for recognition for an act that is out of scope for their normal military duties. One of the attendees excused themselves from the table and on return very excitly exclaimed that they had just met David Beckham and was so delighted that had been allowed a selfie with him (DB), this was all said just as they sat back next to HRH - HRH laughed at being less popular than DB himself!
I will say, DB was charming and articulate - clearly the lessons had paid off.
No problem - content to give someone else a smile. He was ok, but had a temper. What Harry wants.......Fantastic. Thanks for sharing!
And 2014 was more or less peak Harry the Hero, wasn't it? They might find it difficult to fill a table for him these days....
Gotta love that judgeOfficially dead
You clearly have more to tell us. Spill!!!!!No problem - content to give someone else a smile. He was ok, but had a temper. What Harry wants.......
Quite possibly the £35k really was the fee from Schillings (plus a baker's dozen of QCs or whatever).35 grandthe greed is unbelievable!
What a bastard. That's more money than half the population earn in year. Disgusting that he thought that was appropriate and well done to the judge for denying him.
The Harkles need to learn that sueing people is not a quick way to earn money
Ugh the horrible sugars are slating William for making a statement denouncing racism in football.
It doesnt matter what he says he will always be wrong, so instead of being glad he's against racism its all about the royal family being racist towards poor little Smeggy.
One of them goes on about Smeggys family but seems to have overlooked the fact that Smeggy doesn't care about any of her black relatives except her mothershe's shown zero interest in her black cousins.
Harry Markle blog on the Travelyst statement:Petty Harry And The Travalyst Farce
What is worse than a Sussex word salad speech? A padded Sussex PowerPoint presentation, that was dressed up as a report. I only wish that it was a corny joke, but alas, it is real life that has bee…harrymarkle.wordpress.com
'After nearly two and a half years, what exactly has Travalyst achieved? What it does is give Harry some much needed PR, and keeps his name in the news. Well, he does try, and apparently he has pushed for statement to be read out next week regarding the apology the Mail on Sunday made in reference to his claim that an article defamed and harmed his reputation with the military. Petty as they come it seems. The media outlet printed a correction (even though it didn’t technically defame him) and made a donation to Invictus, but Harry shows his lack of character with zero integrity by wasting money and the time of the courts in seeking the statement to be read out in the High Court. No one is proud of him at all.'
I think they will amend the Birth Cert againI don’t think so. If they remove the Sussex title, but Harry retains Prince, she would be know as Princess Harry of Wales, in the same way Princess Michael of Kent is referred to by her husband’s title.
Actually I maybe wrong with who owns what - as there are intermediary holding groups... so apologies <slinks away...>Quite possibly the £35k really was the fee from Schillings (plus a baker's dozen of QCs or whatever).
Hizzoner said in effect 'you have wasted my time and your money - have a derisory £2.5k and be off with you'. I read somewhere that ANL (thanks @liar liar for the catch) didn't send legal representation today which is apparently 'unusual' but no point wasting money that they could be spending on the barrels of ink needed for Harkles 'duty to the truth' coverage.
Thanks @Baguette (or should that be "merci"?) I didn't realise he was still droning on about this. Talk about flogging a dead horse.It's his response to the Mail's claim that he didn't reply to Lord Dannat's letter and had not been in touch with the Royal Marines since Megxit.
(Mail have already printed a clarification/apology and paid a donation to Invictus even though they were right on the facts as far as we can tell)
When Harry gave a speech to Fast Company two weeks ago, he attacked the 'Murdoch press' and spoke out in favour of censorship. I think that the UK press collectively are done with keeping his secrets after that. A lot of Harry stories have been spiked over the years out of respect to the RF. I get the feeling they are going to be printing a few now. Harry has spoken about a 'duty to the truth' so he should be fine with it
Does Harry have a clue how petty this makes him look?From Chris Ship
Harry's team have had a pop at the Mail in court so presumably he'll feel better now.
ETA Write up in the Evening Standard
Prince Harry settles Royal Marines legal claim against Mail on Sunday
The Duke of Sussex has accepted an apology and “substantial damages” from the publishers of the Mail on Sunday after he was accused of snubbing the Royal Marines when stepping down as a senior royal.www.standard.co.uk
This is perfect......and so apt.....!!!!!!Harry & Meghan #55 With a lawsuit here and a lawsuit there, here I sue, there I sue, everywhere we sue sue
Absolutely hillarious...I'm new to commenting but not new to the site.
I have one small first-hand tale to tell regarding the formerly known as Prince, I think some may find it amusing - I still laugh now. (I do have another regarding the shambolic wedding, but for another day)
At a Millies award night (Sun newspaper thing) approx 6 years ago (Dec 2014), around the table in HRH's presence was a group of military personnel, all there for recognition for an act that is out of scope for their normal military duties. One of the attendees excused themselves from the table and on return very excitly exclaimed that they had just met David Beckham and was so delighted that had been allowed a selfie with him (DB), this was all said just as they sat back next to HRH - HRH laughed at being less popular than DB himself!
I will say, DB was charming and articulate - clearly the lessons had paid off.
In early October last year the press including Daily Mail commented on Sir Richard Dannat's letter to Hazzno, that the veterans needed him and missed his support. I wonder if BP sanctioned this with a view ahead to relieving Hazzno of his military roles. The former head of the British Army would not speak to the press about a member of the RF without BP approval. I'm probably being cynical here but BP are crafty and ruthless, and I hope they have this pair of hustlers trussed up well and good by the time this is over.Please remember that The Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday are owned by two different newspaper groups; ANL & DMGT respetively.
Probably an attempt by Happy Harry to fill the avoid where his donation/contribution should have been, but was reallocated to fund Meggie’s penchant for mushroom colour home furnishings and woke coffee table books.35 grandthe greed is unbelievable!
What a bastard. That's more money than half the population earn in year. Disgusting that he thought that was appropriate and well done to the judge for denying him.
The Harkles need to learn that sueing people is not a quick way to earn money
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?