About Archie
The theories that the surrogate kept him trouble me for one reason. Do you really think that would be ‘allowed’ to happen? Particularly if the baby was genetically Meghan and Harry? Surely a huge amount of pressure both obvious and covert would have been used. And they would have pinned the whole transaction down legally before it took place.
Also surely, given how delicate this situation is, wouldn’t their choice if surrogate have been very careful? Either using a proven surrogate or someone who had complete loyalty?
I just can’t see a surrogate getting away with deciding to keep the baby, especially if it isn’t biologically hers.
I know what the law is, but the law is disregarded so often when it comes to the rich and powerful.
I suppose the whole thing could have been planned in advance of the birth and documents lodged to be revealed should anything happen to the surrogate.
I don’t know. I just can’t believe that this would have been tolerated.
Something I think more likely, is that there was something wrong with the baby. Something not obvious during scans or maybe developed during the early weeks. A mitochondrial disorder or neurological damage during the birth? Something like that. Which would account for them having the baby for a short time and then Archie disappearing. Maybe Meg, being a narcissist, wasn’t interested in looking after a very poorly baby. Looking after a baby with a life limiting prognosis must be soul destroying and would absolutely stop her bid for celebrity and status in Hollywood. So they hand Archie back to the surrogate. It would explain Harry’s fading and dead behind the eyes look.
Those photos that were taken of Meg and the doll in the babycarrier are odd too. It’s so obviously incorrectly fitted and looks uncomfortable. You’d be worried if your baby was being held so carelessly. Not grinning like a fool. I think it is a doll in that photo. But why aren’t they taking more care over appearances like that?
I don’t know. Nothing adds up.