Not sure if this has been posted here but says on Daily Mail Meghan accused Victoria Beckham of leaking stories and Harry confronted David and they fell out.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
It doesn’t say they fell out.
No, but I do think it’s the reason they went to Canada and not the US.
No my mistake says sparked a row.
The media can be c*nts but to suggest that they are entirely to blame is just not true. A series of bad decisions and gaffes has made reporting on the Sussexes very easy. That Prince Harry has made it to 35 years old and is so incredibly clueless as to the consequences of his words and actions is just astonishing.
It was Dr Hasnat Khan, a heart and lung surgeon.
Long time lurked, first time poster here in this thread. And might I say thank you for all this information I've acquired even if I did lose 5 days of my life!
I think this has some merit. I dont believe Harry is entirely innocent but he does appear to be manipulated by Meghan. And he feels alienated by his family regardless of the fact that it's due to his own doing. If Charles and the Queen have a genuine understanding of his fragility, and the risks that may bring I thing they will go easy on him. It's obvious that they utterly despise Meghan but they still love him and I dont believe they want to lose him. I think they may give in because if they don't, then they're sure to lose him and a rift like that may never be mended. And I do think that would be tragic.
I'm not British and therefore don't have a lot of knowledge about the RF. However, as a spectator I was genuinely excited when they got engaged to see what hopefully positive and dynamic perspectives she would bring but alas no. This is just car crash
And as for the Disney contract and the tacky merch developments, it's like a TV parody of the RF you'd expect to see David Walliams appearing in!
He’s a lovely man. Treated a friend with heart problems a couple of months ago.
This is also what I think might happen. If he's fragile they might not want to push too hard and therefor H&M get what they want and the Royal family will be deemed pointless IMO.
Meghan could have done this whilst being part of the royals, given her fee will be going to a charity and that would have been seen as a progressive new role. However, it appears she's after the money.
Exactly I don't actually think they deserve to get anything but the Queen is stuck between a rock and a hard place, and if she loves her Grandson well then her hands are tied.
That's certainly a risk but they also respond to public opinion, which is very much "let them go but they're not getting the royal perks" from my impression of what I've read.
They deffo don't deserve to keep their titles makes a mockery of the rest of the Royals.
OMG lmao. i am pretty sure he's still going on about his gaffs! i just so curious what he calls that witch!I just wish we could hear Prince Phillips views on the whole debacle.... Proper wish he was able to live-tweet Monday's meeting with them all
Well lets hope they do listen to public opinion.
How tacky is that to merch your brand in shirts, sweaters etc ??It gets more embarrassing by the day.
Philip might not yet be dead, but the royals that are must be somersaulting in their tombs
And some merch.
A hoodie and some socks for the queen
She's nothing but a white trash person that snaked her way into the royal family.
Did anyone see Harry MERCHED his wife to Bob Iger? Disney's CEO?
Moment Prince Harry appears to tout Meghan for a Disney voiceover job
At the Lion King premiere in London last July, the Duke of Sussex collared the powerful Disney chief and advertised his ex-actress partner's 'interest' in doing voiceover work.
I really do think the Queen should have said no when Harry asked her permission to marry Meghan. I think at the very least he should have been told they needed to date for 2 more years in order to get to know each other properly. Maybe that's the way forward for anyone in line to the throne up to a certain number of places down the list, a minimum dating period prior to marriage (say 4 years) to weed out any chancers like Meghan.
I am in no way defending the behaviour either and fully agree with the above points.I think re the William vs Harry trauma angle...that (my hunch - dont shoot me
Those who have said he’s a grown adult now losing his mother as a child bla bla. I lost my father In traumatic circumstances as a child. It affects me far more now I am an adult. My understanding etc. So let’s not pretend he’s had years to get over it. Or compare him to William we all deal with stuff differently.
Harry should have just married Cheryl Tweedy at least she would have had more respect for the UK.
- Status