Harry & Meghan #444 Prince Harry and the case of the missing cheque

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Yeah - such a racist shithole it is the preferred destination of hundreds of thousands of migrants.

As you rightly say - there are some racists here. There will always be arseholes in every country. Most of us, however, couldn't give monkey's what colour anyone is. Ot what their sexuality is. Or what their religion is. We just take them as they are and judge on integrity and personality.

Britain is a very tolerant country indeed, but these two and others like them seem hellbent on creating an atmosphere of racial tension we have never had before. It's heartbreaking.
Exactly - the vast majority of people I know in the UK and (all of my family) don't give a monkey's chuff what colour your skin is, what's in your underwear or who you choose to share the contents with. If you're a bleep, you're a bleep, not that my sainted mother would ever use that word!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 58
The photographer chap was probably talking loudly on his phone, or playing something without headphones. That's a much more likely reason for an eyeroll in First than any actual racism.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 45
Not so much now, but when his brother was younger, just the bottom part of the face
Harry, when he was younger and pre-Meghan days, had a softer, sweeter expression, in general, which was very slightly reminiscent of Diana, imo. The scowling set in, in a big way, once he was with Meghan.

He looks a lot like Charles, really, imo. Except Charles looks a heck of a lot happier, and more upbeat.

There's a photo of Harry in uniform where he bears a very slight resemblance to Philip, although he was never a patch on Philip, who was very dashing in his youth. He and the queen were a very striking couple, in their heyday.

Charles looks more and more like Philip as he gets older. There are some photos of him, especially since he became king, where for a split second you would actually think it was Philip.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 38
Speak for yourself, Mr Premier.

Christmas, I hope the pair of them don't come here. What is it anyway with all the speculation about upcoming tours???
You can fecken well pay it out of your own fecken pocket Cook.
No gruesomes in my state.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 24
I may be digging a bit deep here but is It any wonder the depths she plunges . l am wondering if Meghan wore the silver
'slave collar ' in Nigeria as a subliminal sign of her belonging to 'her people '.
That and the fact it was a direct copycat from
'Mummy my Mummy' Diana's
Accessories.
Is she that clever/crafty/vile to do that ?
I may be losing it though tbh 🤣
 

Attachments

  • Like
  • Haha
  • Sick
Reactions: 34
That woman hasn't had an original idea in her life - the 'slave collar' will have been because Diana wore it, she's not bright enough to think of anything subliminal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 39
View attachment 2949561



You might note, as I have now just done, that there are many discussions online about this figure appearing in this painting.

I'm wondering if you might find a History of Art course interesting? Artists have been using this ancient figure (and many other meaningful figures and symbols) since the middle ages. Also since that time, artists have been deliberately manipulating our perceptions in all sorts of ways. The objectively present images we see in this painting are not of the nature of pareidolia which is subjective.
In pre-literate societies, people learnt how to read paintings, sculptures, monuments, bas reliefs, sacred buildings etc. much as we would read a book - or as easily as we today see the King's face here.


Watch Celt View's video at her YT link below from about 4:36 to about 5:49
Stop at c. 5:52 to more fully apprehend the head of the baphomet - and how it was re-constructed by moving panels of the painting around.

It's not baphomet, turn it the right way up and it's:

_132931786_americanrivieraorchard.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 41
why does Megabitch have to have her phone in her hand everywhere she goes?
It’s the sort of thing a teenager does.
You don’t see the other Royals doing it.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sick
Reactions: 33
Back to the Nigeria guff:

%9D%92%95%F0%9D%92%86%F0%9D%92%93-v0-l3mxhcorms1d1.jpg


Look at her face and the tendons in her neck, she is absolutely petrified 🤣

I think she went to Nigeria thinking she'd be universally worshipped, natives would dance in the streets, she would hit them with her "Look how white I am but I see myself in YOU!" and they'd fall to the floor sobbing with gratitude, maybe she'd tell them how the US has electricity and not to be scared of the horseless carriage she arrived in...

But for all its imperfections Nigeria is its own country, modern and with its own culture, and the women in particular saw straight through to her empty hollow heart.

Props to the real Nigerian women in this photo for the epic side eyes they're throwing her way 😁
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 49
This is a really interesting post. I'd always assumed that only the Duke title could be removed, that he'd always be Prince Harry and Smegs then Princess Henry (which would morph into Princess Meighan). That's why I'm against removing the Duke Title - no point, however if the Prince title can be removed then that would be amazing.... Mind you, I can't imagine parliament ever bothering with this, as you say, they ought to but I don't think they will. Interesting that King George acted 2 years before parliament - especially on such an important issue as being a traitor during wartime.
I recently finished reading a biography about George V which changed my perception of him. I thought of him as someone who just shot birds and collected stamps but he also had the courage to make tough decisions when required. I think most Monarchs think about how history will remember them and sadly King Charles will be remembered for his imbecile son and his vicious wife.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 40
This is a really interesting post. I'd always assumed that only the Duke title could be removed, that he'd always be Prince Harry and Smegs then Princess Henry (which would morph into Princess Meighan). That's why I'm against removing the Duke Title - no point, however if the Prince title can be removed then that would be amazing.... Mind you, I can't imagine parliament ever bothering with this, as you say, they ought to but I don't think they will. Interesting that King George acted 2 years before parliament - especially on such an important issue as being a traitor during wartime.

The whole PR thing about Harry refusing to stay in a Royal residence due to security concerns, so staying in a hotel instead is just bizarre. How a hotel can be safer than a Royal residence is beyond me, I'm assuming it more paid for guff from the gruesomes to get attention over security and make it clear that they are the ones saying 'no', not the King. I really hope that one of their PR rats spills the beans one day.
BIB

The 'security concerns' might be that he was offered accommodation, but the RF refused to also provide it for his American security. Or even let them inside Crown Estate property. As they're perfectly entitled to do.

So the narrative becomes 'Poor me. These days I am safer in a hotel than in an RF property". Sob.

Imagine what the Duke of Westminster would be going through right now if the Harkles were coming to the wedding. Endless calls and emails about 'muh securideeeee'. Threats and PR briefs not to attend if a full platoon of shaven-headed heavies in sunglasses couldn't escort him and Smeg up the aisle of Chester Cathedral. While the RPOs belonging to two future Kings lurk unobtrusively in the background.

Considering their status the Grosvenors maintain a pretty low and unflashy profile.

The antithesis of what Haz has become.

Who'd want the Harkle 'spectacle' and all the hassle that goes with it at what's supposed to be your big day?
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 46
Awww....dear Avid and her addiction to drama 😂

Scotland Yard has both a website and a phone number.
Anyone can call them from Gib!
Thanks for saying this as I was thinking the same. These idiots fighting on Twatter and YouTube are just so pathetic.

There will always be unhinged arseholes in the world who write stupid things on social media.
Of course threatening to blow someone up should warrant a visit from the police but the sugar troll in question is so moronic they probably couldn't find their way to this country let alone Buckingham Palace. They all write this tit because they can get away with it and wind people like her up.

I'm sure that the security forces surrounding the Royal Family keeps an eye on this sort of thing without any guidance from her 🙄
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 32
Harry & Meghan #445 Beauty with Brian

I think I'm going to change Rachel's name to Brian :unsure: 🤣
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 35
Is this her? The eyebrows look wrong and the hair looks too silky. It was on Twitter. It could be a still from their Netflix dross.

View attachment 2950420
The picture is indeed from the Netflix documentary but I honestly don't think it is her that Harry is kissing because as you pointed out the eyebrows are wrong and the hair is too silky. Plus the ear looks different than Meghan's.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 27
The picture is indeed from the Netflix documentary but I honestly don't think it is her that Harry is kissing because as you pointed out the eyebrows are wrong and the hair is too silky. Plus the ear looks different than Meghan's.
It's definitely him though, no one else has a knob nose like that one!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 33
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.