Harry & Meghan #440 Wham bam, call me Ma'am

[Cinnamon.girl]

Bookworm

Thanks @LadyMuck
On the St Paul's visit, there were both cheers and boos for the Stoat. One catcall of "Traitor!". Footage has been edited and MSM reports that he received a hero's welcome. On Tuesday the IG hall was nearly empty, and he arrived alone at St Paul's.

Both Harald and his father need to shave their neck hair, which looks dirty and scruffy, gross. The Stoat looked scraggly, and why was he wearing the KCRVO around his neck?

Some Spencer family members showed up, including Harald's uncle Charles. Understandably they're not fans of Chuck and Camilla, and possibly feel a misplaced sympathy for Harald.

BookWorm is only really interested in getting Harald removed from the LoS, and finding out the truth about the Flatpacks.

She read today that KC "was not emotionally ready to meet" his son.
Who can argue with that? If all else fails, fall back on mental health.
The RR is an idiot, but it makes Chuck look like a weakling.
BookWorm doesn't like Camilla's clothes, but thinks Sophie's really stylish and looks great.

 

[Chita]

Scarlet O'Hora: Fiddle dee expenses

Please can this be a title one day?????

 

[Nuttynana]

Was he high?

View attachment 2925154

Cretinous,, bleep, duck off to Nigeria with your nutjob nobody.
---

Please can this be a title one day?????

duck me the Minge meringue manifests again haggard old harpy.

 

[Cinnamon.girl]

Yes, I think you're right about the invisikids.
IF they exist in biological, human form, how is it not neglect if they rarely go out with their parents except nursery school, never get a chance to socialise in the real world with ALL their family, don't go on holidays with their parents and family (except for very rare PR purposes), never go into shops to buy sweeties and little toys with their pocket money, never go out to help buy groceries, have fun at fairs and theme parks, restaurants, libraries..?

Then there's the burden of parents who seem to be endlessly in conflict with something or other, away from home very frequently, and at least one parent who is a substance abuser and the other said to be a 'narcissistic sociopath'.... in other words, they seem like children who are not of any healthy priority in their parents' lives.
Good grief, poor children. Their plight is damn near tragic.
Children of families with money, power, status and fame are not any more protected from neglect and abuse than a lowly paid road sweeper's children. (In fact, they're too often less protected.)

My parents were also well off as little children during the Great Depression. It really hit me as a child when my mother told me about the time her family were driving (that is, they were amongst the very few who had a car) to visit relatives in the North of England who were hugely well off. They passed through some poor towns and were shocked to see all the little children playing in the streets with no shoes on. In England in the 1930s.
Her parents made their children aware of their good fortune and not to squander it. Mum saved everything from rubber bands and brown paper bags, glass jars, 'silver paper', string, socks to darn, clothes to mend, newspapers....anything that could be repurposed and repaired...tch, and these youngsters today think they invented recycling! She never spent a penny where a ha'penny would do (mind you, that might have been her Scottish blood!).

This is rather like Diana used to do with her sons...taking them to visit homeless shelters and those who weren't well off. The lessons were very valuable for them. They helped make William who he is today. But what of the other on whom the lessons were lost....? Will he be teaching his children that poor and vulnerable people make for great PR photo-ops...? (And how much money will those children have to spend on therapy!)

It's noticeable that the Flatpacks are only relevant in relation to the RF, not to their own parents. Article after article about Chuck's wish to see them, their royal cousins, how they're missing their UK royal heritage, sending presents, zoom calls with HM and now the King.. .. a pair of invisible parasites who do not exist imo thank God.

Not a whisper of them with their parents, photos, proof. No real photos of the two little ones who are allegedly missing out, just an assortment of other people's children who we are supposed to swallow whole as Nos. 6 and 7 in the LoS. TPTB contempt for the truth is explained by the fact that the Flatpacks are home and dry, and they can all do and say what they want. Do Not Challenge The Monarchy.
The children are a tool against the Monarch who legitimised them illegally, that is all they are.

 

[wisebutwild]

But, but, but, they need Perkin and Warbeck (and Dorito at a push) for the Netflix show t'GSO tried to pitch a year or so ago about her Nigerian roots.

So they'll take them to get some footage of P&W's robot laughs, as t'GSO throws herself on the floor weeping when she discovers that actually her African ancestors weren't from Nigeria, they were from elsewhere in Africa and happened to be sold into the Atlantic slave trade by Nigerian middlemen related Shouty Shola.
It will be a smash hit on Netflix (like all their other shows).

OK, you’ve got me stumped ….. I know it's ‘the wife’ but what does t’GSO stand for …… listen for the loud groan when you tell me as I know it will be something everybody else has sussed out but me!

 

[wibble]

OK, you’ve got me stumped ….. I know it's ‘the wife’ but what does t’GSO stand for …… listen for the loud groan when you tell me as I know it will be something everybody else has sussed out but me!

The Great She Ostrich.

I blame this Yorkshire acronym creator I've installed.

 

[Amiyaya]

It's noticeable that the Flatpacks are only relevant in relation to the RF, not to their own parents. Article after article about Chuck's wish to see them, their royal cousins, how they're missing their UK royal heritage, sending presents, zoom calls with HM and now the King.. .. a pair of invisible parasites who do not exist imo thank God.

Not a whisper of them with their parents, photos, proof. No real photos of the two little ones who are allegedly missing out, just an assortment of other people's children who we are supposed to swallow whole as Nos. 6 and 7 in the LoS. TPTB contempt for the truth is explained by the fact that the Flatpacks are home and dry, and they can all do and say what they want. Do Not Challenge The Monarchy.
The children are a tool against the Monarch who legitimised them illegally, that is all they are.

it’s an awful situation for our monarchy and constitution and I really feel uneasy.

 

[wisebutwild]

The Great She Ostrich.

I blame this Yorkshire acronym creator I've installed.

Did you hear the groan? I always read your posts and laugh every time The Great She Ostrich is mentioned and the picture it conjures up in my head so don’t know why I had a blank with it. Have to say if I mention some of the things I thought it meant I would be banned for here!

 

[Wackie Jeaver]

Can I come out yet? Has he gone now??

 

[Chita]

Can I come out yet? Has he gone now??

He's had a lovely time visiting with his Spencer family.
His uncle and one aunt attended his service at St Paul's then they all went off to one of the Spencer homes to spend family time together.

They are all so loving and supportive.

Oh, wait, no, Harry stayed in a hotel on his own.

 

[Hannahebee]

So, instead of being in America for Mother's Day on Sunday Meghan has decided that it is better to spend it in Nigeria far away from Archie and Lili. I mean why would you decide to go Nigeria in the middle of such a special occasion it really is bizarre and it adds further speculation that the children do not exist.

 

[2ofeach]

Ooh will the photo taker allow you to share their pics with us?

They shared about 8 photos & a few videos all of which are quite outing therefore it's probably best to not make them public... boooo!
They were incredibly close to KC, Camilla & Sophie who all looked fabulous.
I've not yet heard anything of their day which I trust was spent having a bloody lovely day. The weather really was just perfect.

 

[Cinnamon.girl]

I'm baffled as to why the King's epic failure to deal with a serious constitutional problem is seen as strong, brave or statesmanlike. Reader comments congratulate KC on "snubbing" his son, leaving Harald and his Ho still free without censure to carry on causing damage to our Monarchy and the Commonwealth.

It's like a parallel universe, the Stoat humiliation and madness analysed and rejoiced over, and at the same time his father's enabling of their destructiveness is ignored. KC3 is almost a victim now as we've been worn down by daily descriptions of him as brave, cancer-stricken and compassionate for the last 3 months. 50 photos of him at the Horse Show!. He's not looking bad at all, lots of people have cancer, and he can't use it as a shield or excuse.
A report that he wouldn't meet his son unless Camilla was there too? Not emotionally ready. What a load of codswallop.
Catherine is genuinely ill, you can see and you can't mistake that look.

The RF are out in a show of force, par for the course, but I bet there's deep unease and division about what's happening. Interfering with the LoS is against the law.
William's overnight absence from home is a good sign, and his colour is better.

How long will this go on for, and for how long will the Palace refuse to come clean? We're constantly being steered off the right path. All the gongs and meaningless trinkets won't make up for what the Waleses went through, and our Monarch never lifted a finger. Catherine is still being trolled, the trollers still have a free pass and the Sussexes continue unhindered. Regular reports that they've had their chips prove unfounded, and this will stay the case as long as their Royal links remain as strong as they are.

We'll be laughing at her dresses and Warrior Princess ceremony, but this Royal-in-all-but-name tour will go to their heads and is dangerous. The muted squeak from the British Ambassador that it was a "private" tour said it all. It isn't. It will be all over the press.

 

[LadyMuck]

GB news just said there are elections in Nigeria and there is a black Donald Trump! He's about to be interviewed after the break. He's called Gayton Mackenzie

 

[Chita]

I'm baffled as to why the King's epic failure to deal with a serious constitutional problem is seen as strong, brave or statesmanlike. Reader comments congratulate KC on "snubbing" his son, leaving Harald and his Ho still free without censure to carry on causing damage to our Monarchy and the Commonwealth.

It's like a parallel universe, the Stoat humiliation and madness analysed and rejoiced over, and at the same time his father's enabling of their destructiveness is ignored. KC3 is almost a victim now as we've been worn down by daily descriptions of him as brave, cancer-stricken and compassionate for the last 3 months. 50 photos of him at the Horse Show!. He's not looking bad at all, lots of people have cancer, and he can't use it as a shield or excuse. Catherine is genuinely ill, you can see and you can't mistake that look.

The RF are out in a show of force, par for the course, but I bet there's deep unease and division about what's happening. Interfering with the LoS is against the law.
William's overnight absence from home is a good sign, and his colour is better.

How long will this go on for, and for how long will the Palace refuse to come clean? We're constantly being steered off the right path. All the gongs and meaningless trinkets won't make up for what the Waleses went through, and our Monarch never lifted a finger. Catherine is still being trolled, the trollers still have a free pass and the Sussexes continue unhindered. Regular reports that they've had their chips prove unfounded, and this will stay the case as long as their Royal links remain as strong as they are.

We'll be laughing at her dresses and Warrior Princess ceremony, but this Royal-in-all-but-name tour will go to their heads and is dangerous. The muted squeak from the British Ambassador that it was a "private" tour said it all. It isn't. It will be all over the press.

That "it's a private tour" announcement is as much use as when a newspaper prints an apology hidden at the bottom of page eight.

Nobody notices it.



The faux royal tour will be all over the news.

Just like yesterday's invictus thing. We didnt see anything of the veterans.
Just Harry hogging the limelight as usual.


Nigeria will be the same.

 

[LadyMuck]

TRG

 

[wibble]

So, instead of being in America for Mother's Day on Sunday Meghan has decided that it is better to spend it in Nigeria far away from Archie and Lili. I mean why would you decide to go Nigeria in the middle of such a special occasion it really is bizarre and it adds further speculation that the children do not exist.

Mothers Day is three days or two weeks earlier now.
And you can arrange for another mother to celebrate the happy event if you are busy,

 

[hehehe]

So, instead of being in America for Mother's Day on Sunday Meghan has decided that it is better to spend it in Nigeria far away from Archie and Lili. I mean why would you decide to go Nigeria in the middle of such a special occasion it really is bizarre and it adds further speculation that the children do not exist.

I believe the kids exist AND what this proves is that the grifting pair are tit PARENTS.

 

[Elainne]

I think the balloon company originally posted the pic, so she must have allowed it and/or have an arrangement with them. Has she resorted to merching Aldi's birthday?





SMM have thoughtfully provided us with a Bingo Card.

In view of past Inflictus events I would also add:

Inappropriate clothing. Possibly shorts.
Leads a parade.
Flashes in golf buggy.


View attachment 2922733

Scratches her fanny.

 

[Hannahebee]

I believe the kids exist AND what this proves is that the grifting pair are tit PARENTS.

By going to Nigeria without them during Mother's Day it just shows that neither one of them care about Archie and Lili because if they did care they would not go during Mother's Day and would have gone in the next few weeks instead of tomorrow.