Have we seen this?View attachment 2743944
Royal Rogue spoke about this on his video I think yesterday or the day before. It took forever for Backgrid to answer him how much would it cost for him to use a pic of the Sussexes in a carpark on his video. If I remember correctly the price for one photo on one video was $750. They also made an offer for him: 3 photos for one video for the discount price of $1850! Needless to say he didn't take it.Also they're charging per use on social media for the backgrid photos too.
Wow, how did you find a photo taken in the Montecito bedroom?!I googled terrifying smile and this was the first thing to pop up…View attachment 2743942
Is she parked in a carpark?
Maybe she's had their tennis court made over to look like a carpark and has positioned some cars to make it look like she's driving in traffic.
She can always use one of the flat packsShe might want to use the little seat lift dumb fucking bitch!
Was she taking driving lessons on a parking lot...? I thought it was sort of illegal to drive a car where you can't see out of. Kinda like letting a child drive a car and they cannot even see over the steering wheel without sitting on a pile of phonebooks.Even backgrid hate her and deliberately show their pap in the reflection!View attachment 2743964
Brilliant @Chita …. I’m now here curling my lip and singing this like Elvis, good job nobody around to see me!Harry & Meghan #416 since my fam'ly snubbed me, found a new place to dwell. On the end of lonely street- haznofriends hotel.
It prob won't fit.
Something else …..she’s a nutter!I agree, something profoundly amiss with her mind...
But I really, really can't get my head round why she does this?
What exactly is the purpose of staged shots that are often blurry and always cringey?
I mean, walking through the actual, practical set up for these shots, she has to plan where she's going to be at a very specific time; then she has to consciously pick up her phone and press buttons and actually speak to Backgrid people to tell them to be there.
Then she has to take time out of her day (Ok, we know she only works an hour a week, but still she has to organise herself to go out.)
She has to make sure the flatpacks are taken care of, that the car has enough gas, then drive to that place, keeping an eye on the clock, and perhaps loiter around if the Backgrid people are a bit late.
Then she has to practically deal with the Backgrid bills for photog, processing and photo distribution. She'll see tangible proof of her inane, useless behaviour....
All this takes a high level of engagement, consciousness of her activities.
But there's zero financial utility in these photos - no one ever gave her a job because they saw a cringey, blurry Backgrid shot of her!
So why does she do it?
I have only two reasons:
1. Every one of these photos is calculated and timed to be a sharp, toxic arrow aimed at the RF - a wind-up, a photographic version of flipping the bird at them, 'Ner, ner, I'm still here, infesting your nightmares and daymares!!' A sort of harassment in plain sight.
2. Is it pathological vanity? Does it make her feel VVIP? Does it feed her pathological need to be the centre of a camera's attention?
Is it both?
Or something else?
Healed my arse lol
In LA you can give a blowjob as you drive. Ask Madame ... she'll confirm it.Same in France. Eating, drinking and applying makeup can all lead to being fined. It's considered a risk to your concentration.
I would but I can’t get it to do bold on my phone because I’m a technophobe
As my mum always said "it's a shame to spoil two houses" !At least They’ve saved two other people from being miserable!
Nor me @Debra_WhingerWas she taking driving lessons on a parking lot...? I thought it was sort of illegal to drive a car where you can't see out of. Kinda like letting a child drive a car and they cannot even see over the steering wheel without sitting on a pile of phonebooks.
BTW I'm still not convinced they own that house in Montecito or that they live there.
I know she probably wouldn't have done it but it would've been brilliant if Catherine was there.Isn't this guy her friend?
View attachment 2744043
I see no Smeg.
View attachment 2744045
View attachment 2744044
40 Megastars, One Magnificent Image: British Vogue Assembled Models, Movie Stars, Musicians And Moguls For A Once-In-A-Lifetime Farewell Shoot
“No one woman could or should encapsulate these past few years for the magazine,” Edward Enninful writes in the March issue of British Vogue – his last as editor-in-chief. “What we needed was a group, to bring to life what I hope has been a daring, disruptive and evolutionary period in Vogue’s...www.vogue.co.uk
she's a CUNT. End ofI agree, something profoundly amiss with her mind...
But I really, really can't get my head round why she does this?
What exactly is the purpose of staged shots that are often blurry and always cringey?
I mean, walking through the actual, practical set up for these shots, she has to plan where she's going to be at a very specific time; then she has to consciously pick up her phone and press buttons and actually speak to Backgrid people to tell them to be there.
Then she has to take time out of her day (Ok, we know she only works an hour a week, but still she has to organise herself to go out.)
She has to make sure the flatpacks are taken care of, that the car has enough gas, then drive to that place, keeping an eye on the clock, and perhaps loiter around if the Backgrid people are a bit late.
Then she has to practically deal with the Backgrid bills for photog, processing and photo distribution. She'll see tangible proof of her inane, useless behaviour....
All this takes a high level of engagement, consciousness of her activities.
But there's zero financial utility in these photos - no one ever gave her a job because they saw a cringey, blurry Backgrid shot of her!
So why does she do it?
I have only two reasons:
1. Every one of these photos is calculated and timed to be a sharp, toxic arrow aimed at the RF - a wind-up, a photographic version of flipping the bird at them, 'Ner, ner, I'm still here, infesting your nightmares and daymares!!' A sort of harassment in plain sight.
2. Is it pathological vanity? Does it make her feel VVIP? Does it feed her pathological need to be the centre of a camera's attention?
Is it both?
Or something else?
Oh, he asked her but she had to refuse as she was picking up milkshakes for the flatpacks on that day …… such a shame!Isn't this guy her friend?
View attachment 2744043
I see no Smeg.
View attachment 2744045
View attachment 2744044
40 Megastars, One Magnificent Image: British Vogue Assembled Models, Movie Stars, Musicians And Moguls For A Once-In-A-Lifetime Farewell Shoot
“No one woman could or should encapsulate these past few years for the magazine,” Edward Enninful writes in the March issue of British Vogue – his last as editor-in-chief. “What we needed was a group, to bring to life what I hope has been a daring, disruptive and evolutionary period in Vogue’s...www.vogue.co.uk
I see 'megastar' Jameela Jamil.Isn't this guy her friend?
I see no Smeg.
..or give her a spot in a straight-to-video tacky sci-fi movie... The Triffids are Back! and they're eyeballing YOU!Somebody needs to get the whore a booster cushion HEE HEE!
Who the hell drives around holding a mug of coffee? I own like 20 travel mugs ffs! Don’t most people who drink coffee or tea???According to the Mail, carparkle was seen driving around drinking coffee
View attachment 2743259
That's against the law in the UK!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?