Surely the opposite should be the case, why wouldn't they? The king's brother is all over the internet as having gone to the Ukraine with the British Foreign Secretary recently and abused two children.
It's not clear whether he went or not.
If he did it will have been with the king's permission.
If he didn't go as part of the government delegation, they should say so.
If he did go, this contradicts Chuck's statements that there's no role for PA.
BP should have already issued a statement to clear up these seriously bad allegations.
Why haven't they?
The only tangible connection seems to be this.
D Express
"
Apr 14, 2023 — Helicopter flown by Prince Andrew during Falklands War donated to Ukrainian fighters."
And Obasi's "witness statement", unchallenged.
Plus the Foreign Office sealing of PA's Trade Envoy records, all over the press. Even if this is "routine", why 12 years later?
Celt is normally sensible, but she said she believed this 100%.
The way this has been left, we assume the worst. Sensible people on this thread have dismissed it as rubbish, but there's no clarity.
2 + 2 = 5.
Compare the Palace response when Susan Hussey asked innocent questions. Her feet didn't even touch the ground before she and William were thrown under a bus to distance the chicken RF from "racism" that never was. The Palace issued a statement within hours distancing themselves. They should do the same for Andrew.
@knoddle posted
"The Tipsy Titan posted photos of PA riding in Windsor on June 5th, so I don't believe it and I don't think the RF should comment on such hogwash."
I must disagree here. Your average internet browser can't be expected to match up the pictures of PA in Windsor riding on 5th June as posted by our Tipsy Titan. These are serious allegations rather than hogwash and should be squashed.
I'm late for the festive season here again even though I never stopped working 
