Thanks
@Verfugbar for the title and
@Shushex for the recap.
In reply to
@Verfugbar 's post just as last thread was closing.
Angela Kelly NDA
I can't see this coming from the Sussexes for reasons below.
Daily Mail
"
We can now reveal that the deal was orchestrated by the Palace in accordance with the King's wishes that the family would not be hit by any embarrassing revelations."
I think the NDA was supposed to stay private, as it's nobody else's business. AK was angry at being told she couldn't finish her 3rd book which she's in the middle of publishing, and angry that the house she was told she could stay in had to be vacated. This was obvious from her tweets at the time.
Maybe she was insulted by the NDA and leaked it? Someone did. BP then had to confirm the NDA and a house up north and no book. Linking AK to "embarrassing revelations" was unfair.
Given that the first two books were a tribute to our late Queen, it's unlikely that the 3rd book would contain any "embarrassing revelations". The Palace could always vet it before publication, unlike Spare, but this isn't what this is about. It's other secrets.
Harry reportedly fears AK above everyone else and fears she'll go for him in her 3rd book. Maybe it's to protect Harry that she's been silenced, which would suggest that this isn't stirring from the Harkle camp as they'll be relieved. AK will know all there is to know about the 2 dead women in Sandringham/Kensington, unsolved, and with further rumours about Harry's possible violence a lid needs to be kept on it all.
A Palace aide handing an NDA to AK is embarrassing, and I don't think the NDA was meant to be made public. It's possible AK bit back.
The Palace has strict control of the press when they want to, like with Susan Hussey, and they are not victims at the mercy of what is printed. To blur things they sometimes pretend to be, but they've messed up here imo.