Surely they won’t want to mess with a protocol that would remove Smegs hrh on divorce or is that just gone anyway as not working royals so it doesn’t matter?
Surely they won’t want to mess with a protocol that would remove Smegs hrh on divorce or is that just gone anyway as not working royals so it doesn’t matter?Tbh I don't see the point of this. And can't see it happening anyway. What's done is done.
Oh, thank you @wisebutwild !!!!!! Been wanting one for a long time.Your wish is my command @DoubleOld ...... this group is growing .... people are seeing the light!
View attachment 2169889
i want to add to that my 2 cents:I think the tricky thing with the children's business is that even if they exist, and were born out of the ILBW, she would be feeding the speculation as she just loves the attention and the do-they-don't they - they do it with everything, it's like a signature. Also, the more speculation there is around the subject, the more the ILBW can charge for an exclusive feature with the kids once she gets custody - and if the kids exist, I think it's Hazno that has been keeping them from the limelights.
If they don't exist, or if they were born out of a surrogate, the Harkles are playing a very shady game as medical information is under very strict privacy laws. I doubt that even TRF could do much without liability to be sued - and what a mess that would be - by the Harkles themselves.
So, I, like everyone, can't be sure either way. It says a lot that both possibilities could be right and the way they are so dishonest and play with the public opinion.
No one should be able to mess up brownies enough that they resemble the mess that Smegs wasGot a batch of homemade brownies baking in the oven. If I stick toothpicks in them when they’re cut, maybe they’ll kinda resemble Smegs in that brown mess she wore out last!
Thinking out loud here...and wondering if 'frostbite' is a euphemism for something else ;-) that ailed him in the nether region.His todger and swell should never be used together
He is such a sad bastardThinking out loud here...and wondering if 'frostbite' is a euphemism for something else ;-) that ailed him in the nether region.
I showed mum the pics from the 'date night' while she was doing the dishes. Then mentioned how her legs and basically the entire physique are just like my narc ex-boss'. Now I am banned from mentioning such "terrible people with bad vibes" while she's handling crockery, because her favourite mug nearly slipped from her hands when I didShe's always had quite gangly legs, not the type that you would see regularly going hiking
Wish someone would investigate them
i think one of things that infuriates them, is that they cannot weaponize the children…by denying KC their presence. I doubt KC is pining for children that he has rarely, if ever seen, and are the offspring of a nasty troublesome son and his disaster of a wife. For his own PR purposes, KC may occasionally spout some ‘affectionate’ reference, but, if he saw them on the sidelines with their nannies while he was on a walkabout, could he even recognize them?i want to add to that my 2 cents:
1) the kids aren't photogenic, or, even worse, as papa Markle said, that boy has his eyes and his nose; and Lilibucks looks like her dad's dad (whoever he is) instead of Di. that must sting like a sonuvabitch.
2) she will weaponise those kids against Charles above anyone else, bc C-Rex has the all moneys, and she will keep them away and deny him meeting them as a way to punish him (for throwing them out, i am prepared to die on that hill), bc she's a narc and that's what narcs do.
I'd heard of that with popular Facebook pages a few years ago, so not a stretch. From what I've seen, persons or organisations would buy popular social media pages or accounts, including all passwords and security data, content already posted, followers, stats, even planned content. Sometimes they would have the previous owners continue to handle the page for a while during handing over, sometimes it would be an abrupt transition. Someone was recently looking to sell their business, including their social media handles and content which actually formed a huge part of the valuation. They'd posted quite a few details so was an interesting read.If I’m not mistaken, I read somewhere (on someone’s Twitter page,) that she had handed over and/or sold her account to someone. I’m not on the Bird site, so not certain how that works, but apparently she, as BB, is not posting as herself anymore.
I can see it being more significant if WM makes it his 1st directive as King. As a young prince, didn’t he tell Diana not to worry, he’d give it back when he’s king? Wouldn’t that pull on the heartstrings? JMO. But it shows him as a man who keeps promises, even tho they were made decades ago? Idk. As a mother, I’d want it back from my son the king. Not an ex husband. Anyway…Happy Sunday Tattle friends, hope your Mothers Days have been wonderful.It would make the Diana fans happy, show generosity of spirit and soothe both his sons one of whom matters enormously. The only downside is that it could be asked why it was stripped from her in the first place, that it's too late and that the damage is done.
It could raise more questions than it answers, about security etc. Difficult to know, maybe better wait for William as Chuck wouldn't do it willingly imo. William would.
Shall you tell Chuck, or will I? Don't forget that I'm from the fringes of Manchester, the cultural oasis of Bolton....well hard.
Every time I see that photo of Meghan with the children draped on her, it irritates me.
My heart aches for poor WilliamI had a look on the internet, and according to press reports it was at Charles's insistence that she had her HRH title removed. HM wanted her to keep it. Assuming that this is the case - and if I can find it anyone can - it would look very odd and raise questions if Charles now restored it to Diana when his wife has just been crowned Queen.
Best for William to do it, as he promised her he would when he was a young boy. It's his promise to keep.
Still makes me cry
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?