A lot of people get cross about her being referred to as Kate but that’s her name! All her family and friends call her that, including Uncle Gary! It’s just that the royals prefer her to be known by the more formal Catherine which is correct.
A lot of people get cross about her being referred to as Kate but that’s her name! All her family and friends call her that, including Uncle Gary! It’s just that the royals prefer her to be known by the more formal Catherine which is correct.[
You could well be right, the children exist and they used surrogates. That's what makes this thread interesting, all the different opinions and beliefs, but whatever the truth this charade can't carry on for much longer.
Hasn't Baroness Bruck been acquired by the Harkles, rather than become a supporter of the Harkles? I thought Baroness Bruck had sold out to the Harkles, left, and the Harkles in the name of Baroness Bruck are now trashing Catherine and her children?
Amazingly they're still calling her Kate Middleton. Part of me thinks this is done with affection as in "our Kate", but she should be called by her correct title. Surely if the Palace objected to Kate it would be done? A word from KC? Or don't they mind?
Samantha really is as bright as a blacklight bulb isn't she? she'll be sued into her next 3 incarnations for this interview.From Paula M’s recent interview w/Sam Markle. (If already posted, chalk it up to me being old!)View attachment 2169677
She’s always had sparrow legsMeghan's legs look really unhealthy in this picture and if she is using Ozempic one of the side effects is that it can cause major loss of muscle mass and reduce bone density.
I believe whoever’s children they used in the past for photos has turned around and said, look enough is enough you can’t use them anymore. Either there are no kids or the real kids are so unlike any of the pics they’ve released, they’re having to wait until they are older and nobody will notice how much they’ve changed!I believe the children exist. That’s about it. I think they used surrogates. But one or both of them may be infertile…so who knows what combination went into the procedure. Or maybe they arranged private adoptions.
They really can’t merch children that are never seen. And it’s very hard to believe that these supposed hoards of paps who stalk their every move…never get a photo of either of the children.
I just think that compared to other pictures that we have seen of her in the past she looks quite unhealthy, has lost a lot of weight and looks like a totally different person.She’s always had sparrow legs
Yes definitely, she’s much thinner but the legs have always been the same as they are nowI just think that compared to other pictures that we have seen of her in the past she looks quite unhealthy, has lost a lot of weight and looks like a totally different person.
Meghan Markle speaking about her moral compass????? BWHAhahahahahahahahaWarning: Please procure a chuck bucket before watching this!
Sorry no badge for sitting on the fence about the kids …..I believe the children exist. That’s about it. I think they used surrogates. But one or both of them may be infertile…so who knows what combination went into the procedure. Or maybe they arranged private adoptions.
They really can’t merch children that are never seen. And it’s very hard to believe that these supposed hoards of paps who stalk their every move…never get a photo of either of the children.
I think the media use the kate middleton title in a spiteful way thoughA lot of people get cross about her being referred to as Kate but that’s her name! All her family and friends call her that, including Uncle Gary! It’s just that the royals prefer her to be known by the more formal Catherine which is correct.
But were the Netflix kids really H and M's or borrowed to make things look 'normal'The fact we haven't seen them since the Netflix documentary makes me think that something is amiss because people know what the children look like from the documentary, yet no sightings have been reported of the children with Harry and Meghan since.
Personally I think they were borrowed as in the clips that we saw of the children they didn't interact with Harry and Meghan and they didn't seem to have a bond with them either. Another thing I found strange in the documentary is that we didn't see Archie and Lili playing together and they didn't interact with each other as a result it felt like they were strangers and not brother and sister.But were the Netflix kids really H and M's or borrowed to make things look 'normal'
Thank you for answering all my questions so thoroughlyPrince Louis' birth had nothing to do with him, so I wonder that too. In the same way, he keeps bringing up Kate's struggles with the press when trying to argue his OWN case. He actually doesn't have enough ammo against them, Prince William and Kate were the most targeted so he uses them to strengthen his argument.
Regarding this, they said the DM contacted them first asking whether Thomas Markle had staged the pics. Which gave them time to confront him and ask if he did so they could make a deal and make it go away. He denied it and they ignored the DM, which then published the proof that it was all staged. Marking the start of the drama.
So yes it is possible that they knew about the pictures on the 11th before they were published.
But I do agree with you, partly. Personally, I think Harry didn't know. I think Peg and her people arranged it. Did Samantha ever admit it was actually her idea? Or did she just say she wasn't opposed to it?
I agree with you 100%. There were people opposed to the queen televising her Coronation. Now it's the norm and actually praised.
Will and Kate will be fine.
I hope they do the same for various charities. Because at the end of the day, their job should be the focus.
If we all hang on long enough we will be sure to see Queen Kate Middleton one day....I think the media use the kate middleton title in a spiteful way though
But were the Netflix kids really H and M's or borrowed to make things look 'normal'
Your wish is my command @DoubleOld ...... this group is growing .... people are seeing the light!Just snorted out my iced tea. That is funny!
Can I have a Flatpack Truther logo? I can't figure out how to copy and paste it.
They'll still be calling her that when she's the queen!I think the media use the kate middleton title in a spiteful way though
well they still call QC by her first husband's name. not even bother to return her to maiden name. did she have her surname reverted by poll? or did she take Charles' surname when they married? the royal surnames or what are they called are very confusing. William is Wales, his kids were Cambridge until recently, when the time comes, only George will keep the Wales surname.If we all hang on long enough we will be sure to see Queen Kate Middleton one day....
Yes, and she obviously thinks they look really good but quite honestly, they don't, imo.She's always had quite gangly legs, not the type that you would see regularly going hiking
I think the media use the kate middleton title in a spiteful way though
Maybe Haz has had me one those customised sex robot dolls commissionedI just think that compared to other pictures that we have seen of her in the past she looks quite unhealthy, has lost a lot of weight and looks like a totally different person.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?