oh, so you see it as well
the more i look at William i feel he's handsome Charles (not in the vein of Handsome Squidward, tho), plus all the best things Diana (except maybe luxuriant hair that runs in her family, although i don't find it a detractor in PoW's case) and Harry, as i said many times, looks like ugly, charmless Charles. and poor Lady Di's demons on steroids.
i don't know if i mentioned it before, but i read this book (
) about Lady Di, so now i'm an authority (sarcasm, of course!). but what i really want to say is that the (one) book i read is interesting because it was published in 98, therefore it was written before and during the Diana zeitgeist. this is, well, at least from my point o view, important, because in the last almost 26 years, the Diana mythos has grown and spread in so many ways that it's sometimes hard to separate grain from chaff. what i mean from all the previous word salad is that before her passing, the world was sick and tired of Diana, she was inconsistent, mercurial and straight bordering Alex Forrest from the Fatal Attraction in her recurring antics. so it's always interesting to me to read or see docs from that time about her, they were much more truthful than all the saccharine revisionist media that came after her death.
all things said, i still blame Charles. he was 33 when he wed his teenage bride. he was a FULL GROWN-ASS MAN. he should have known better.