That's interesting, thanks. Why did they leave the West Coast alone (I haven't studied this!)?
Is it only Britain who had slave ships?
That's interesting, thanks. Why did they leave the West Coast alone (I haven't studied this!)?View attachment 2006371
Why have they all conveniently forgotten that the French were there first and the Spanish!
Argentina won't go anywhere near the Falklands. They don't have a navy, and what planes they have would be blown out of the sky by the SAM's that are stationed around the islands, and this is not even mentioning the planes that the RAF have stationed.Not everyone has to be interested in world history, but if you are going to say things in tv please do a bit of research. If anything it’s giving England much too much credit. We maybe industrialised it and it’s certainly recent, but the Spanish, the French the Belgians, the Portuguese, the Dutch were out there too. The Arabs, the Han dynasty, the Japanese all built and sometimes lost empires. Don’t forget the Romans, the Egyptians, the Ottomans, the Turks, the Greeks, the Persians, the Kazakhs. Slave trades ran in all directions including within the continents of Africa and the Americas.
If either of them had said that the Royal family had benefited greatly from colonisations and slavery in the past that would have been true.
Argentina needs to leave the Falklands alone. The islanders have spoken.
My husband can't speak at all, since he had a stroke. Try living with that! I can't see, so we make a right pair! I think he also had an affair with a work colleague! In fact, I know he did!Well I suppose he has to say that as he is doing the square root of f all regarding any other form of service to the community or world at large. He must spend his days in a drug induced haze talking to all his hallucinations……..THAT IS WHY THEY HAVE SO MANY TOILETS, because he said the toilet talked to him before! No real friends, just porcelain ones.
I’m sorry, but it needs re-iterating….I despise this pair.
I've struggled to keep up this week. I was still in the last thread. I've not quoted anyone but given lots ofomg i cannot catch up and then reply weirdly and randomly to messages from pages ago. It's a mess. Can anyone keep up?
Courtney, Jennifer, Jason Bateman were out with Jimmy Kimmel and they were papped from a distance, but the A list group looked like a normal and genuine group of friends, oblivious to the pap/mobile. Looking chilled and effortlessy dressed (even if their jeans cost more than my mortgage!!) Even waiting outside the restaurant to get in.I seriously hope that Jennifer Aniston is going to get the harkles membership taken off them. Not only because of the photographer but because Jennifer is huge friends with Courtney Cox and it would be excellent revenge for haz ratting on Courtney having mushrooms in her house.
I think the benefit is that no other RF members live in BP currently - it is mainly offices and used for ceremonial occasions ... and it's well awat from PPOWSo the King takes Frogmore off them and offers them a Buckingham palace flat
To me this article reads like it came straight out of the Narcles’ mouths. Since it says no offer of a royal place to stay in has been made by the RF, I just don’t believe the BP apartment story.The optics don't look very good, it looks like an upgrade. Which it is.
Also looking forward to the tabloid writers penning an open letter to the American I.R.S pointing out every single discrepancy or item that Harry’s accountants might conveniently try to hide.You can have houses all over there world. Your "domicile" is where you spend X amount of time. In Europe, in most countries if not all, you can pay taxes in countries where you prove you spent 3 months straight. It also depends on the source of the income. Given that Aitch spent at the most 3 weeks in the UK, I don't see how not having Frogmore would change his tax status in the US. That said, looking forward for the US IRS to go through Aitch, the ILBW and Archewell finances.
Wow, smeagol and misheard are very similar, but so is haz! Amber heard despite proclaiming her victimhood to the world, angerily states she is not a victim:So he doesn’t want to be a victim, yet spends his whole time telling everyone why he’s a victim.
Okay, he lost his mum at a young age, and that’s so very sad, but so have lots of other kids, and they don’t let it define the adult they become.
I’m sick of hearing him complaining, poor me, poor me. Sod off Harry, no-one cares mate!!
Do they not see how they’re coming across? Do they not wonder why they have no family or friends?
the West coast wasn’t as easy to get to also Northern California and above was kind of Russian territoryThat's interesting, thanks. Why did they leave the West Coast alone (I haven't studied this!)?
Is it only Britain who had slave ships?
The RF must yearn for the days when they could stick their crazy family members in a turret somewhere and lock them away from public view.BIB
Talking of Hazza's utter drivel, isn't it the Better Up thing in San Francisco this week, featuring CHIMPO as some kind of....ahem...'expert'?
More crap for us all to laugh at.
Because that's what he's reduced himself to. By completely over-egging the pudding, and not knowing when to shut the fuck up - because the Great Unwashed just need The Thoughts Of Chairman Hazbo on endless repeat in their lives - he's now a figure of fun and any more 'revelations' and pronouncements will be met with increasing levels of derision and disbelief.
And he'll push back even more, and people will just point and laugh even more.
And round and round we'll go. For years, probably. Until William's on the Throne and Haz will finally be dealt with.
This statement doesn’t actually say they have been invited to the Coronation …….
Well I doubt the apartment will be theirs, they can just stay there - house arrestSo the King takes Frogmore off them and offers them a Buckingham palace flat
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?